All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, quic_qiancai@quicinc.com,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, will@kernel.org, woodylin@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu()
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:06:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123110648.GA37253@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118102927.4854-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:29:27AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> To hot unplug a CPU, the idle task on that CPU calls a few layers of C
> code before finally leaving the kernel. When KASAN is in use, poisoned
> shadow is left around for each of the active stack frames, and when
> shadow call stacks are in use. When shadow call stacks are in use the
> task's saved SCS SP is left pointing at an arbitrary point within the
> task's shadow call stack.
> 
> When a CPU is offlined than onlined back into the kernel, this stale
> state can adversely affect execution. Stale KASAN shadow can alias new
> stackframes and result in bogus KASAN warnings. A stale SCS SP is
> effectively a memory leak, and prevents a portion of the shadow call
> stack being used. Across a number of hotplug cycles the idle task's
> entire shadow call stack can become unusable.
> 
> We previously fixed the KASAN issue in commit:
> 
>   e1b77c92981a5222 ("sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug")
> 
> ... by removing any stale KASAN stack poison immediately prior to
> onlining a CPU.
> 
> Subsequently in commit:
> 
>   f1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
> 
> ... the refactoring left the KASAN and SCS cleanup in one-time idle
> thread initialization code rather than something invoked prior to each
> CPU being onlined, breaking both as above.
> 
> We fixed SCS (but not KASAN) in commit:
> 
>   63acd42c0d4942f7 ("sched/scs: Reset the shadow stack when idle_task_exit")
> 
> ... but as this runs in the context of the idle task being offlined it's
> potentially fragile.
> 
> To fix these consistently and more robustly, reset the SCS SP and KASAN
> shadow of a CPU's idle task immediately before we online that CPU in
> bringup_cpu(). This ensures the idle task always has a consistent state
> when it is running, and removes the need to so so when exiting an idle
> task.
> 
> Whenever any thread is created, dup_task_struct() will give the task a
> stack which is free of KASAN shadow, and initialize the task's SCS SP,
> so there's no need to specially initialize either for idle thread within
> init_idle(), as this was only necessary to handle hotplug cycles.
> 
> I've tested this with both GCC and clang, with relevant options enabled,
> offlining and onlining CPUs with:
> 
> | while true; do
> |   for C in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online; do
> |     echo 0 > $C;
> |     echo 1 > $C;
> |   done
> | done
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211012083521.973587-1-woodylin@google.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YY9ECKyPtDbD9q8q@qian-HP-Z2-SFF-G5-Workstation/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211115113310.35693-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> Fixes: 1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")

Ugh, that should be f1a0a376ca0c4ef1 (with a leading 'f'), as in the
body of the commit message.

I can fix that up for v3, unless someone's happy to fix that up when
picking this up.

Thanks,
Mark.

> Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Woody Lin <woodylin@google.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cpu.c        | 7 +++++++
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Since v1 [1]:
> * Clarify commit message
> * Fix typos
> * Accumulate tags
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211115113310.35693-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 192e43a87407..407a2568f35e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>  #include <linux/smpboot.h>
>  #include <linux/relay.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/scs.h>
>  #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
>  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  
> @@ -588,6 +589,12 @@ static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * Reset stale stack state from the last time this CPU was online.
> +	 */
> +	scs_task_reset(idle);
> +	kasan_unpoison_task_stack(idle);
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * Some architectures have to walk the irq descriptors to
>  	 * setup the vector space for the cpu which comes online.
>  	 * Prevent irq alloc/free across the bringup.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 3c9b0fda64ac..76f9deeaa942 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8619,9 +8619,6 @@ void __init init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
>  	idle->flags |= PF_IDLE | PF_KTHREAD | PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
>  	kthread_set_per_cpu(idle, cpu);
>  
> -	scs_task_reset(idle);
> -	kasan_unpoison_task_stack(idle);
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	/*
>  	 * It's possible that init_idle() gets called multiple times on a task,
> @@ -8777,7 +8774,6 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
>  		finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
>  	}
>  
> -	scs_task_reset(current);
>  	/* finish_cpu(), as ran on the BP, will clean up the active_mm state */
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-18 10:29 [PATCH v2] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu() Mark Rutland
2021-11-23 11:06 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-11-23 11:09   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211123110648.GA37253@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=woodylin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.