All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 10:53:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124105311.GF3366@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbf91d44-8c8f-15b4-a093-58c04d668156@suse.cz>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> Any thoughts?  For now I can just hack around this by skipping
> >> reclaim_throttle if cgroup_reclaim() == true, but that's probably not
> >> the correct fix. :)
> >> 
> > 
> > No, it wouldn't be but a possibility is throttling for only 1 jiffy if
> > reclaiming within a memcg and the zone is balanced overall.
> > 
> > The interruptible part should just be the patch below. I need to poke at
> > the cgroup limit part a bit
> 
> As the throttle timeout is short anyway, will the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE vs
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE make a difference for the (ability to kill? AFAIU
> typically this inability to kill is because of a loop that doesn't check for
> fatal_signal_pending().
> 

Yep, and the fatal_signal_pending() is lacking within reclaim in general
but I'm undecided on how much that should change in the context of reclaim
throttling but at minimum, I don't want the signal delivery to be masked
or delayed.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-22 14:46 [PATCH v5 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim until some writeback completes if congested Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim and compaction when too may pages are isolated Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made Mel Gorman
2021-11-24  1:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-24  1:49     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-24 14:35       ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-24 18:02         ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-24 10:32     ` Mel Gorman
2021-11-24 10:43       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-11-24 10:53         ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-11-24 17:24       ` Mike Galbraith
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/writeback: Throttle based on page writeback instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/page_alloc: Remove the throttling logic from the page allocator Mel Gorman
2021-10-25 10:07   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/vmscan: Increase the timeout if page reclaim is not making progress Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/vmscan: Delay waking of tasks throttled on NOPROGRESS Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-19  9:01 [PATCH v4 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-19  9:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made Mel Gorman
2021-10-08 13:53 [PATCH v3 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 12:31   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 13:03     ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:45       ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211124105311.GF3366@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.