From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75798C433F5 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1359807AbhKZJPV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 04:15:21 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:38500 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344934AbhKZJNU (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 04:13:20 -0500 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706EF1FD37; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:10:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1637917807; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xpmiuQDntOm8Lz6C0/YW5KKh0GvIedoqL55Y+rluSTg=; b=G4NhSfadFPAoQXYvpwS8GvrLKTSEe4nzw2hhbBze0rZ0lewtdC4/UbEr9yLpKCl2fLQV6I 1H4xqPmQQbDR9vy8b3sStpQ8fdsCPD2+xxFQpkOFIANxpnJ3YwAAN1t4/flb41zEzF3Eeo Ah5e55bJJfKWZpmcW07C9rD1G52/DpY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1637917807; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xpmiuQDntOm8Lz6C0/YW5KKh0GvIedoqL55Y+rluSTg=; b=NB2ZHjBZl1jJXxa1UXM8FdG4z18qkM0Y+VJJURrVyw+V2Q55BJn+zv9M3udFHF/zVfrvIZ 5ZiBHC3DDL9t0dAw== Received: from quack2.suse.cz (unknown [10.100.200.198]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34638A3B88; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1FF871E11F3; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:10:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 10:10:07 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Chengguang Xu Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, jack@suse.cz, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chengguang Xu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 2/7] ovl: mark overlayfs inode dirty when it has upper Message-ID: <20211126091007.GB13004@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20211122030038.1938875-1-cgxu519@mykernel.net> <20211122030038.1938875-3-cgxu519@mykernel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211122030038.1938875-3-cgxu519@mykernel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon 22-11-21 11:00:33, Chengguang Xu wrote: > From: Chengguang Xu > > We simply mark overlayfs inode dirty when it has upper, > it's much simpler than mark dirtiness on modification. > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu > --- > fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 4 +++- > fs/overlayfs/util.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c > index 1f36158c7dbe..027ffc0a2539 100644 > --- a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c > @@ -778,8 +778,10 @@ void ovl_inode_init(struct inode *inode, struct ovl_inode_params *oip, > { > struct inode *realinode; > > - if (oip->upperdentry) > + if (oip->upperdentry) { > OVL_I(inode)->__upperdentry = oip->upperdentry; > + mark_inode_dirty(inode); > + } > if (oip->lowerpath && oip->lowerpath->dentry) > OVL_I(inode)->lower = igrab(d_inode(oip->lowerpath->dentry)); > if (oip->lowerdata) Hum, does this get called only for inodes with upper inode existing? I suppose we do not need to track inodes that were not copied up because they cannot be dirty? I'm sorry, my knowledge of overlayfs is rather limited so I may be missing something basic. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR