From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from outbound-smtp03.blacknight.com (outbound-smtp03.blacknight.com [81.17.249.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6852C80 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail05.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.26]) by outbound-smtp03.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AF04C0CAA for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 438 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2021 09:43:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO techsingularity.net) (mgorman@techsingularity.net@[84.203.17.29]) by 81.17.254.9 with ESMTPSA (AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 2 Dec 2021 09:43:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:43:32 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Alexey Avramov , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Rik van Riel , Mike Galbraith , regressions@lists.linux.dev, Linux-fsdevel , Linux-MM , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to make progress Message-ID: <20211202094332.GW3366@techsingularity.net> References: <20211125151853.8540-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20211127011246.7a8ac7b8@mail.inbox.lv> <20211129150117.GO3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201010348.31e99637@mail.inbox.lv> <20211130172754.GS3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201033836.4382a474@mail.inbox.lv> <20211201140005.GU3366@techsingularity.net> <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211201172920.GA8492@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:29:20AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Again 5.16-rc1 stuttered badly but the new patch was comparable to 5.15. > > > > As my baseline figures are very different to yours due to differences in > > storage, can you test the following please? > > I don't know if this was directed at me, but I reran my swapfile > testcase on 5.16-rc3 and found that it had nearly the same runtime as it > did in 5.15. > Thanks Darrick. Can I add the following? Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs