From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2728C433EF for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241121AbhLMQyy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:54:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241044AbhLMQyp (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:54:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E40C061748 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:54:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id nh10-20020a17090b364a00b001a69adad5ebso13838804pjb.2 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:54:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s8LWBVAbOYqYnLKDnLn1dN7nJhLJCQoGJHk1oKVhcUk=; b=WuKsQo0fw2nn9BpUCQz206FIeOWFQMpeF0G5UdA1t7Q5pGN7VbJDbm7T/R9CZj9pi+ Sz9odTrwdfIJ80CznxuK/YFdkpYEdt8LOF4cOR14HY8EFLUQXxcFFI9U0AxRnT2afYXo I6szIUiAjGx5u7H8/L5WJB5PYOA5ybcVz5vWf+Dmfk0CgxXrwfFcO1nJbq1i4Wd/IccD VpwX+8B1JcBEifkyZ3MmM4T2YmbbvmTyx2/2z2T7rMG/AiMuCvugTpIuUrwmHg/9pHYG 9doLoiij89Pkx5FgNBGJ7apViE3ggVsaBATjuNPIOt5hUWhwqyIlx0zjqiZTi/PaVAME VWPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s8LWBVAbOYqYnLKDnLn1dN7nJhLJCQoGJHk1oKVhcUk=; b=rYnXM8r1rQAUBgdT/DVdoL+m9R5RSEmgAPjomhnIKFHLKqPT/RQ31JuItfZ+fn/mR7 rVphhgSU4tLdFWJDeVM8dpM9tyl5ojIQNdaBOZDS4QcZApsTSJn5ekjDowMUZXe+egdT IIqbSoys10F3R5x8GBc5zoRrdzrPMPdoJkNGIM8ihJOd5cqYAFwpwL6j7mFjQoCuC7+1 pbMWroG/3wUjFXPyxu60Tt2GZF12Rx71vDLGHtI2KRfqLpfuayIhvGQb7rSYjniAt1Ji lbyQ4Fefy3OX5fddckTpNzz4oFscTIDbdGSEV3SZtZldp2ni4BSCQ+4GtH7ZHosXXBzp s5Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wSSwkdF5RJGbMocZSuPkPCd+aJcrHtBgZxCLr16cE8M5lKc2H dWZ42uaXQ/8kdyZmWmGY8UC6VQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlwwd3Pb8MV6v72upJ2o2fdPkYT+fNXXX8YM2811k/Lrx9lD1CZuM1rvE7Pey/8yEm7Tzwig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6487:: with SMTP id h7mr45336487pjj.40.1639414483641; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([139.177.225.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n11sm10430992pgp.15.2021.12.13.08.54.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 08:54:43 -0800 (PST) From: Muchun Song To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com, alexs@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, kari.argillander@gmail.com Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, fam.zheng@bytedance.com, smuchun@gmail.com, Muchun Song Subject: [PATCH v4 03/17] fs: introduce alloc_inode_sb() to allocate filesystems specific inode Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 00:53:28 +0800 Message-Id: <20211213165342.74704-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 (Apple Git-122) In-Reply-To: <20211213165342.74704-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> References: <20211213165342.74704-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The allocated inode cache is supposed to be added to its memcg list_lru which should be allocated as well in advance. That can be done by kmem_cache_alloc_lru() which allocates object and list_lru. The file systems is main user of it. So introduce alloc_inode_sb() to allocate file system specific inodes and set up the inode reclaim context properly. The file system is supposed to use alloc_inode_sb() to allocate inodes. In the later patches, we will convert all users to the new API. Signed-off-by: Muchun Song --- Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst | 5 +++++ fs/inode.c | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 11 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst index bf19fd6b86e7..c9c157d7b7bb 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst @@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ typically between calling iget_locked() and unlocking the inode. At some point that will become mandatory. +**mandatory** + +The foo_inode_info should always be allocated through alloc_inode_sb() rather +than kmem_cache_alloc() or kmalloc() related. + --- **mandatory** diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 6b80a51129d5..dcb1e6cad201 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static struct inode *alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) if (ops->alloc_inode) inode = ops->alloc_inode(sb); else - inode = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); + inode = alloc_inode_sb(sb, inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); if (!inode) return NULL; diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index bbf812ce89a8..4592f00ec5e7 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -3178,6 +3179,16 @@ extern void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode); extern int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *); extern int file_remove_privs(struct file *); +/* + * This must be used for allocating filesystems specific inodes to set + * up the inode reclaim context correctly. + */ +static inline void * +alloc_inode_sb(struct super_block *sb, struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t gfp) +{ + return kmem_cache_alloc_lru(cache, &sb->s_inode_lru, gfp); +} + extern void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *, unsigned long hashval); static inline void insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode) { -- 2.11.0