From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894E4C433EF for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 19:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234842AbiADTIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:08:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34624 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233466AbiADTIO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:08:14 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80449C061784 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 11:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id l16so15619899plg.10 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 11:08:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cQF+XH6V3kVHXWMXV3EqI1J84nIsrn1qXMCyxHnZTsc=; b=FiB1DfbLLjQ29EVkKGbeCeHRekDd/OS5bBExr6rJx7COnYOge7ZEpfxupcxx5TqM4/ loCsJHdeShJSN0TTKrNk0O/MedFHbumhWmFnidhP6D2gW6t+gOiipwKILPj29DdHKHci w6+yJaBBExlOwHKk9R8QIZCr6xNjFB+LSp8YcoAPNb/hkI3YEFArKh6XxoqLouzdHZfj 7UDna6l9NTPRmT3xuwNHagpxn9IrKt01pBMyHd22sJdPKTHiRIWj6B94Y86HEl41HQBH UwkQ9WR8bJwPd7ixBptosHbjI0DO6Iivoq+eb+UePncHwXZX8X52EOYAPtG1oJVabPNj oLDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=cQF+XH6V3kVHXWMXV3EqI1J84nIsrn1qXMCyxHnZTsc=; b=iXVjNSpQJBCKvO1i1Dm52NCFMu6S7UmhfvWGqsCXoWO7cyLta58gb0S/wd2rKh+lit 7c4fwW+rTmx+1epibe+H7u+OgFS9lHyoYVJcUO6z6Q1/Rg18aTt4BqSltnJwg4YMD8np I3Z+NHyBapBEsm6Cu20dZOQN2wlnoQJujLD1FV4NONZmFoWfCXmN6pZ+oIm3/Xr734x9 uRiDtCwDtduObiu4JLrr2/paPgKTDcnAq0a4gsWcGxLBYFO0B6N5NwsPZBXmk3rsh6js XHkk1E4aMbLDXwY6uHvDkqFV5ccBD+SriO1m969IZk+Dhs3PUgLzP6PM6cn8gQ9TcCxn zmng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325aCig1BI6sJWnlR6NK9cl2d5mF/Tw6YljNW/vUqpNUqFv+Kwr X8kKMLnWf3V88CZiJuIFzivLug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+rINow93orCEPCmEtD0MDuQgTEqcobjcf4Rhbdbw1tMT0NIZjbrecupBcM9PPml8ExcaUEA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d8c:: with SMTP id oj12mr62468509pjb.11.1641323293874; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 11:08:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm499390pjk.2.2022.01.04.11.08.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 11:08:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 12:08:10 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] remoteproc: core: Introduce virtio device add/remove functions Message-ID: <20220104190810.GB540353@p14s> References: <20211222082349.30378-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20211222082349.30378-2-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211222082349.30378-2-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Good morning, On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:23:44AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > In preparation of the migration of the management of rvdev in > remoteproc_virtio.c, this patch spins off new functions to manage the > remoteproc virtio device. > > The rproc_rvdev_add_device and rproc_rvdev_remove_device will be > moved to remoteproc_virtio.c. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > --- > update vs previous revision: > - update according to the rebase from v15-rc1 to v16-rc1 > - split patch to introduce rproc_register_rvdev and rproc_unregister_rvdev > function in a separate patch > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 69f51acf235e..d1f1c5c25bd7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -484,6 +484,61 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from) > return 0; > } > > +static int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > +{ > + struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > + char name[16]; > + int ret; > + > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); > + rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; > + rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; > + dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); > + dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); > + > + ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); > + if (ret) { > + put_device(&rvdev->dev); > + return ret; > + } Registering the device here is a problem... If device_register() fails put_device() is called and we return, only to call device_unregister() on the same device in rproc_handle_vdev(). Moreover in rproc_handle_vdev(), device_unregister() is called in the error path but device_register() is called here in rproc_rvdev_add_device(). This introduces coupling between the two functions, making it hard to maintain from hereon. I suggest calling device_register() in rproc_handle_vdev() after rproc_rvdev_add_device() has returned successfully. More comments to come tomorrow. Thanks, Mathieu > + ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); > + if (ret) > + goto free_rvdev; > + > + /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ > + set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > + > + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, > + dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > + if (ret) { > + dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, > + "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > + dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret)); > + } > + > + list_add_tail(&rvdev->node, &rproc->rvdevs); > + > + rvdev->subdev.start = rproc_vdev_do_start; > + rvdev->subdev.stop = rproc_vdev_do_stop; > + > + rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > + > + return 0; > + > +free_rvdev: > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > +{ > + struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > + > + rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > + list_del(&rvdev->node); > + device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > +} > + > /** > * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource > * @rproc: the remote processor > @@ -519,7 +574,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; > int i, ret; > - char name[16]; > > /* make sure resource isn't truncated */ > if (struct_size(rsc, vring, rsc->num_of_vrings) + rsc->config_len > > @@ -553,34 +607,10 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > rvdev->rproc = rproc; > rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++; > > - /* Initialise vdev subdevice */ > - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); > - rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; > - rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; > - dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); > - dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); > - > - ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); > - if (ret) { > - put_device(&rvdev->dev); > - return ret; > - } > - > - ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); > + ret = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rvdev); > if (ret) > goto free_rvdev; > > - /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ > - set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > - > - ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, > - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > - if (ret) { > - dev_warn(dev, > - "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret)); > - } > - > /* parse the vrings */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i); > @@ -598,13 +628,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > goto unwind_vring_allocations; > } > > - list_add_tail(&rvdev->node, &rproc->rvdevs); > - > - rvdev->subdev.start = rproc_vdev_do_start; > - rvdev->subdev.stop = rproc_vdev_do_stop; > - > - rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > - > return 0; > > unwind_vring_allocations: > @@ -619,7 +642,6 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > { > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount); > struct rproc_vring *rvring; > - struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > int id; > > for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) { > @@ -627,9 +649,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > rproc_free_vring(rvring); > } > > - rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > - list_del(&rvdev->node); > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > + rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev); > } > > /** > -- > 2.17.1 >