All of
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, sockmap: fix double bpf_prog_put on error case in map_link
Date: Tue,  4 Jan 2022 13:46:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

sock_map_link() is called to update a sockmap entry with a sk. But, if the
sock_map_init_proto() call fails then we return an error to the map_update
op against the sockmap. In the error path though we need to cleanup psock
and dec the refcnt on any programs associated with the map, because we
refcnt them early in the update process to ensure they are pinned for the
psock. (This avoids a race where user deletes programs while also updating
the map with new socks.)

In current code we do the prog refcnt dec explicitely by calling
bpf_prog_put() when the program was found in the map. But, after commit
'38207a5e81230' in this error path we've already done the prog to psock
assignment so the programs have a reference from the psock as well. This
then causes the psock tear down logic, invoked by sk_psock_put() in the
error path, to similarly call bpf_prog_put on the programs there.

To be explicit this logic does the prog->psock assignemnt

  if (msg_*)

Then the error path under the out_progs label does a similar check and dec

  if (msg_*)

And the teardown logic sk_psock_put() does,

  psock_set_prog(msg_*, NULL)

triggering another bpf_prog_put(...). Then KASAN gives us this splat, found
by syzbot because we've created an inbalance between bpf_prog_inc and
bpf_prog_put calling put twice on the program.

BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in __bpf_prog_put kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1812 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in __bpf_prog_put kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1812 [inline] kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1829
BUG: KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_put+0x8c/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1829 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1829
Read of size 8 at addr ffffc90000e76038 by task syz-executor020/3641

To fix clean up error path so it doesn't try to do the bpf_prog_put in the
error path once progs are assigned then it relies on the normal psock
tear down logic to do complete cleanup.

For completness we also cover the case whereh sk_psock_init_strp() fails,
but this is not expected because it indicates an incorrect socket type
and should be caught earlier.

Fixes: 38207a5e8123 ("bpf, sockmap: Attach map progs to psock early for feature probes")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <>

Applies against both bpf and bpf-next but labeled for bpf-next given
we are in rc8 now.

 net/core/sock_map.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 9618ab6d7cc9..1827669eedd6 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -292,15 +292,23 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 	if (skb_verdict)
 		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.skb_verdict, skb_verdict);
+	/* msg_* and stream_* programs references tracked in psock after this
+	 * point. Reference dec and cleanup will occur through psock destructor
+	 */
 	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out_drop;
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
+		goto out;
+	}
 	if (stream_parser && stream_verdict && !psock->saved_data_ready) {
 		ret = sk_psock_init_strp(sk, psock);
-		if (ret)
-			goto out_unlock_drop;
+		if (ret) {
+			write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
+			sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
+			goto out;
+		}
 		sk_psock_start_strp(sk, psock);
 	} else if (!stream_parser && stream_verdict && !psock->saved_data_ready) {
@@ -309,10 +317,6 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 	return 0;
-	write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
-	sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
 	if (skb_verdict)
@@ -325,6 +329,7 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 	if (stream_verdict)
 	return ret;

             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04 21:46 John Fastabend [this message]
2022-01-05 19:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, sockmap: fix double bpf_prog_put on error case in map_link patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-01-08 14:10 ` Jakub Sitnicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.