All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH -next V2] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened
@ 2022-01-05  3:56 Laibin Qiu
  2022-01-05 10:56 ` John Garry
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Laibin Qiu @ 2022-01-05  3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: axboe, ming.lei; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel

In case of shared tags, there might be more than one hctx which
allocates tag from single tags, and each hctx is limited to allocate at
most:
        hctx_max_depth = max((bt->sb.depth + users - 1) / users, 4U);

tag idle detection is lazy, and may be delayed for 30sec, so there
could be just one real active hctx(queue) but all others are actually
idle and still accounted as active because of the lazy idle detection.
Then if wake_batch is > hctx_max_depth, driver tag allocation may wait
forever on this real active hctx.

Fix this by recalculating wake_batch when inc or dec active_queues.

Fixes: 0d2602ca30e41 ("blk-mq: improve support for shared tags maps")
Suggested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Laibin Qiu <qiulaibin@huawei.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-tag.c      | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/sbitmap.h | 11 +++++++++++
 lib/sbitmap.c           | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index ae722f8b13fb..df072153c81b 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -15,6 +15,21 @@
 #include "blk-mq.h"
 #include "blk-mq-tag.h"
 
+/*
+ * Recalculate wakeup batch when tag is shared by hctx.
+ */
+static void blk_mq_update_wake_batch(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
+		unsigned int users)
+{
+	if (!users)
+		return;
+
+	sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(&tags->bitmap_tags,
+			users);
+	sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(&tags->breserved_tags,
+			users);
+}
+
 /*
  * If a previously inactive queue goes active, bump the active user count.
  * We need to do this before try to allocate driver tag, then even if fail
@@ -23,10 +38,16 @@
  */
 bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
+	unsigned int users;
+
 	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
-	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
+	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state)) {
 		atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
 
+		users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
+		blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
+	}
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -47,12 +68,16 @@ void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool include_reserve)
 void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
+	unsigned int users;
 
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
 		return;
 
 	atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
 
+	users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
+	blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
+
 	blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
index e40d019c3d9d..62ead1e69e17 100644
--- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
@@ -378,6 +378,17 @@ static inline void sbitmap_queue_free(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
 	sbitmap_free(&sbq->sb);
 }
 
+/**
+ * sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch() - Recalculate wake batch
+ * @sbq: Bitmap queue to Recalculate wake batch.
+ * @users: Number of shares.
+ *
+ * Like sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(), this will calculate wake batch
+ * by depth. This interface is for sharing tags.
+ */
+void sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int users);
+
 /**
  * sbitmap_queue_resize() - Resize a &struct sbitmap_queue.
  * @sbq: Bitmap queue to resize.
diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index af88d1346dd7..aeee5fbd998d 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -392,10 +392,9 @@ int sbitmap_queue_init_node(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int depth,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_init_node);
 
-static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
-					    unsigned int depth)
+static inline void __sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int wake_batch)
 {
-	unsigned int wake_batch = sbq_calc_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
 	int i;
 
 	if (sbq->wake_batch != wake_batch) {
@@ -411,6 +410,23 @@ static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
 	}
 }
 
+static void sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int depth)
+{
+	unsigned int wake_batch = sbq_calc_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
+
+	__sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, wake_batch);
+}
+
+void sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
+					    unsigned int users)
+{
+	unsigned int wake_batch = clamp_t(unsigned int,
+			(sbq->sb.depth + users - 1) / users, 4U, SBQ_WAKE_BATCH);
+	__sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, wake_batch);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_recalculate_wake_batch);
+
 void sbitmap_queue_resize(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, unsigned int depth)
 {
 	sbitmap_queue_update_wake_batch(sbq, depth);
-- 
2.22.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -next V2] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened
  2022-01-05  3:56 [PATCH -next V2] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened Laibin Qiu
@ 2022-01-05 10:56 ` John Garry
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2022-01-05 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laibin Qiu, axboe, ming.lei; +Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel

On 05/01/2022 03:56, Laibin Qiu wrote:
> +
>   /*
>    * If a previously inactive queue goes active, bump the active user count.
>    * We need to do this before try to allocate driver tag, then even if fail
> @@ -23,10 +38,16 @@
>    */
>   bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>   {
> +	unsigned int users;
> +
>   	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
> -	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state)) {
>   		atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
>   
> +		users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +		blk_mq_update_wake_batch(hctx->tags, users);
> +	}
> +
>   	return true;
>   }
>   

This code looks old to me. Which baseline is used here?

Thanks,
John

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-05 10:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-05  3:56 [PATCH -next V2] blk-mq: fix tag_get wait task can't be awakened Laibin Qiu
2022-01-05 10:56 ` John Garry

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.