All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, mgurtovoy@nvidia.com,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3 0/4] queue_rqs error handling
Date: Wed,  5 Jan 2022 09:05:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105170518.3181469-1-kbusch@kernel.org> (raw)

The only real change since v2 is a prep patch that relocates the rq list
macros to blk-mq.h since that's where 'struct request' is defined.

Patch 3 removes the 'next' parameter since it is trivially obtainable
via 'rq->rq_next' anyway.

Otherwise, the series is the same as v2 and tested with lots of random
error injection in the prep path. The same errors would have lost
requests in the current driver, but is successful with this series.

Keith Busch (4):
  block: move rq_list macros to blk-mq.h
  block: introduce rq_list_for_each_safe macro
  block: introduce rq_list_move
  nvme-pci: fix queue_rqs list splitting

 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 28 +++++++++++------------
 fs/io_uring.c           |  2 +-
 include/linux/blk-mq.h  | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/blkdev.h  | 29 ------------------------
 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.4


             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-05 17:05 Keith Busch [this message]
2022-01-05 17:05 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] block: move rq_list macros to blk-mq.h Keith Busch
2022-01-05 18:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-05 17:05 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] block: introduce rq_list_for_each_safe macro Keith Busch
2022-01-05 17:05 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] block: introduce rq_list_move Keith Busch
2022-01-05 18:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-05 17:05 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] nvme-pci: fix queue_rqs list splitting Keith Busch
2022-01-05 18:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-05 19:25 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] queue_rqs error handling Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105170518.3181469-1-kbusch@kernel.org \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.