All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: "bfoster@redhat.com" <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"djwong@kernel.org" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Address soft lockup in iomap_finish_ioend()
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 09:48:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220105224829.GO945095@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9d9b7850c6086b123b4add4de7b1992cb62f6ad.camel@hammerspace.com>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 21:09 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 12:22 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:04:23AM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > > We have different reproducers. The common feature appears to be
> > > > the
> > > > need for a decently fast box with fairly large memory (128GB in
> > > > one
> > > > case, 400GB in the other). It has been reproduced with HDs, SSDs
> > > > and
> > > > NVME systems.
> > > > 
> > > > On the 128GB box, we had it set up with 10+ disks in a JBOD
> > > > configuration and were running the AJA system tests.
> > > > 
> > > > On the 400GB box, we were just serially creating large (> 6GB)
> > > > files
> > > > using fio and that was occasionally triggering the issue. However
> > > > doing
> > > > an strace of that workload to disk reproduced the problem faster
> > > > :-
> > > > ).
> > > 
> > > Ok, that matches up with the "lots of logically sequential dirty
> > > data on a single inode in cache" vector that is required to create
> > > really long bio chains on individual ioends.
> > > 
> > > Can you try the patch below and see if addresses the issue?
> > > 
> > 
> > That patch does seem to fix the soft lockups.
> > 
> 
> Oops... Strike that, apparently our tests just hit the following when
> running on AWS with that patch.

OK, so there are also large contiguous physical extents being
allocated in some cases here.

> So it was harder to hit, but we still did eventually.

Yup, that's what I wanted to know - it indicates that both the
filesystem completion processing and the iomap page processing play
a role in the CPU usage. More complex patch for you to try below...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

xfs: limit individual ioend chain length in writeback

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Trond Myklebust reported soft lockups in XFS IO completion such as
this:

 watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#12 stuck for 23s! [kworker/12:1:3106]
 CPU: 12 PID: 3106 Comm: kworker/12:1 Not tainted 4.18.0-305.10.2.el8_4.x86_64 #1
 Workqueue: xfs-conv/md127 xfs_end_io [xfs]
 RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x20
 Call Trace:
  wake_up_page_bit+0x8a/0x110
  iomap_finish_ioend+0xd7/0x1c0
  iomap_finish_ioends+0x7f/0xb0
  xfs_end_ioend+0x6b/0x100 [xfs]
  xfs_end_io+0xb9/0xe0 [xfs]
  process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
  worker_thread+0x1fa/0x390
  kthread+0x116/0x130
  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

Ioends are processed as an atomic completion unit when all the
chained bios in the ioend have completed their IO. Logically
contiguous ioends can also be merged and completed as a single,
larger unit.  Both of these things can be problematic as both the
bio chains per ioend and the size of the merged ioends processed as
a single completion are both unbound.

If we have a large sequential dirty region in the page cache,
write_cache_pages() will keep feeding us sequential pages and we
will keep mapping them into ioends and bios until we get a dirty
page at a non-sequential file offset. These large sequential runs
can will result in bio and ioend chaining to optimise the io
patterns. The pages iunder writeback are pinned within these chains
until the submission chaining is broken, allowing the entire chain
to be completed. This can result in huge chains being processed
in IO completion context.

We get deep bio chaining if we have large contiguous physical
extents. We will keep adding pages to the current bio until it is
full, then we'll chain a new bio to keep adding pages for writeback.
Hence we can build bio chains that map millions of pages and tens of
gigabytes of RAM if the page cache contains big enough contiguous
dirty file regions. This long bio chain pins those pages until the
final bio in the chain completes and the ioend can iterate all the
chained bios and complete them.

OTOH, if we have a physically fragmented file, we end up submitting
one ioend per physical fragment that each have a small bio or bio
chain attached to them. We do not chain these at IO submission time,
but instead we chain them at completion time based on file
offset via iomap_ioend_try_merge(). Hence we can end up with unbound
ioend chains being built via completion merging.

XFS can then do COW remapping or unwritten extent conversion on that
merged chain, which involves walking an extent fragment at a time
and running a transaction to modify the physical extent information.
IOWs, we merge all the discontiguous ioends together into a
contiguous file range, only to then process them individually as
discontiguous extents.

This extent manipulation is computationally expensive and can run in
a tight loop, so merging logically contiguous but physically
discontigous ioends gains us nothing except for hiding the fact the
fact we broke the ioends up into individual physical extents at
submission and then need to loop over those individual physical
extents at completion.

Hence we need to have mechanisms to limit ioend sizes and
to break up completion processing of large merged ioend chains:

1. bio chains per ioend need to be bound in length. Pure overwrites
go straight to iomap_finish_ioend() in softirq context with the
exact bio chain attached to the ioend by submission. Hence the only
way to prevent long holdoffs here is to bound ioend submission
sizes because we can't reschedule in softirq context.

2. iomap_finish_ioends() has to handle unbound merged ioend chains
correctly. This relies on any one call to iomap_finish_ioend() being
bound in runtime so that cond_resched() can be issued regularly as
the long ioend chain is processed. i.e. this relies on mechanism #1
to limit individual ioend sizes to work correctly.

3. filesystems have to loop over the merged ioends to process
physical extent manipulations. This means they can loop internally,
and so we break merging at physical extent boundaries so the
filesystem can easily insert reschedule points between individual
extent manipulations.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c      | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/iomap.h  |  1 +
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 71a36ae120ee..39214577bc46 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1066,17 +1066,34 @@ iomap_finish_ioend(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, int error)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Ioend completion routine for merged bios. This can only be called from task
+ * contexts as merged ioends can be of unbound length. Hence we have to break up
+ * the page writeback completion into manageable chunks to avoid long scheduler
+ * holdoffs. We aim to keep scheduler holdoffs down below 10ms so that we get
+ * good batch processing throughput without creating adverse scheduler latency
+ * conditions.
+ */
 void
 iomap_finish_ioends(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, int error)
 {
 	struct list_head tmp;
+	int segments;
+
+	might_sleep();
 
 	list_replace_init(&ioend->io_list, &tmp);
+	segments = ioend->io_segments;
 	iomap_finish_ioend(ioend, error);
 
 	while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
+		if (segments > 32768) {
+			cond_resched();
+			segments = 0;
+		}
 		ioend = list_first_entry(&tmp, struct iomap_ioend, io_list);
 		list_del_init(&ioend->io_list);
+		segments += ioend->io_segments;
 		iomap_finish_ioend(ioend, error);
 	}
 }
@@ -1098,6 +1115,15 @@ iomap_ioend_can_merge(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, struct iomap_ioend *next)
 		return false;
 	if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size != next->io_offset)
 		return false;
+	/*
+	 * Do not merge physically discontiguous ioends. The filesystem
+	 * completion functions will have to iterate the physical
+	 * discontiguities even if we merge the ioends at a logical level, so
+	 * we don't gain anything by merging physical discontiguities here.
+	 */
+	if (ioend->io_inline_bio.bi_iter.bi_sector + (ioend->io_size >> 9) !=
+	    next->io_inline_bio.bi_iter.bi_sector)
+		return false;
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1175,6 +1201,7 @@ iomap_submit_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct iomap_ioend *ioend,
 		return error;
 	}
 
+	ioend->io_segments += bio_segments(ioend->io_bio);
 	submit_bio(ioend->io_bio);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1199,6 +1226,7 @@ iomap_alloc_ioend(struct inode *inode, struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
 	ioend->io_flags = wpc->iomap.flags;
 	ioend->io_inode = inode;
 	ioend->io_size = 0;
+	ioend->io_segments = 0;
 	ioend->io_offset = offset;
 	ioend->io_bio = bio;
 	return ioend;
@@ -1211,11 +1239,14 @@ iomap_alloc_ioend(struct inode *inode, struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
  * so that the bi_private linkage is set up in the right direction for the
  * traversal in iomap_finish_ioend().
  */
-static struct bio *
-iomap_chain_bio(struct bio *prev)
+static void
+iomap_chain_bio(struct iomap_ioend *ioend)
 {
+	struct bio *prev = ioend->io_bio;
 	struct bio *new;
 
+	ioend->io_segments += bio_segments(prev);
+
 	new = bio_alloc(GFP_NOFS, BIO_MAX_VECS);
 	bio_copy_dev(new, prev);/* also copies over blkcg information */
 	new->bi_iter.bi_sector = bio_end_sector(prev);
@@ -1225,7 +1256,8 @@ iomap_chain_bio(struct bio *prev)
 	bio_chain(prev, new);
 	bio_get(prev);		/* for iomap_finish_ioend */
 	submit_bio(prev);
-	return new;
+
+	ioend->io_bio = new;
 }
 
 static bool
@@ -1241,6 +1273,13 @@ iomap_can_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, loff_t offset,
 		return false;
 	if (sector != bio_end_sector(wpc->ioend->io_bio))
 		return false;
+	/*
+	 * Limit ioend bio chain lengths to minimise IO completion latency. This
+	 * also prevents long tight loops ending page writeback on all the pages
+	 * in the ioend.
+	 */
+	if (wpc->ioend->io_segments >= 4096)
+		return false;
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1264,7 +1303,7 @@ iomap_add_to_ioend(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct page *page,
 	}
 
 	if (bio_add_page(wpc->ioend->io_bio, page, len, poff) != len) {
-		wpc->ioend->io_bio = iomap_chain_bio(wpc->ioend->io_bio);
+		iomap_chain_bio(wpc->ioend);
 		__bio_add_page(wpc->ioend->io_bio, page, len, poff);
 	}
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index c8c15c3c3147..148a8fce7029 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -136,7 +136,20 @@ xfs_end_ioend(
 	memalloc_nofs_restore(nofs_flag);
 }
 
-/* Finish all pending io completions. */
+/*
+ * Finish all pending IO completions that require transactional modifications.
+ *
+ * We try to merge physical and logically contiguous ioends before completion to
+ * minimise the number of transactions we need to perform during IO completion.
+ * Both unwritten extent conversion and COW remapping need to iterate and modify
+ * one physical extent at a time, so we gain nothing by merging physically
+ * discontiguous extents here.
+ *
+ * The ioend chain length that we can be processing here is largely unbound in
+ * length and we may have to perform significant amounts of work on each ioend
+ * to complete it. Hence we have to be careful about holding the CPU for too
+ * long in this loop.
+ */
 void
 xfs_end_io(
 	struct work_struct	*work)
@@ -157,6 +170,7 @@ xfs_end_io(
 		list_del_init(&ioend->io_list);
 		iomap_ioend_try_merge(ioend, &tmp);
 		xfs_end_ioend(ioend);
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
index 6d1b08d0ae93..bfdba72f4e30 100644
--- a/include/linux/iomap.h
+++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct iomap_ioend {
 	struct list_head	io_list;	/* next ioend in chain */
 	u16			io_type;
 	u16			io_flags;	/* IOMAP_F_* */
+	u32			io_segments;
 	struct inode		*io_inode;	/* file being written to */
 	size_t			io_size;	/* size of the extent */
 	loff_t			io_offset;	/* offset in the file */

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30 19:35 [PATCH] iomap: Address soft lockup in iomap_finish_ioend() trondmy
2021-12-30 21:24 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 22:25   ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-30 22:27     ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 22:55       ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-31  1:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-31  6:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-01  3:55     ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-01 17:39       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-03 22:03         ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04  0:04           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-04  1:22             ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04  3:01               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-04  7:08               ` hch
2022-01-04 18:08                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-04 18:14                   ` hch
2022-01-04 19:22                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-04 21:52                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-04 23:12                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05  2:10                           ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05 13:56                             ` Brian Foster
2022-01-05 22:04                               ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-06 16:44                                 ` Brian Foster
2022-01-10  8:18                                   ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-10 17:45                                     ` Brian Foster
2022-01-10 18:11                                       ` hch
2022-01-11 14:33                                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 13:42                           ` hch
2022-01-04 21:16                 ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05 13:43                   ` hch
2022-01-05 22:34                     ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-05  2:09               ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 20:45                 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-05 22:48                   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-01-05 23:29                     ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06  0:01                     ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-09 23:09                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-06 18:36                     ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06 18:38                       ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-06 20:07                       ` Brian Foster
2022-01-07  3:08                         ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-07 15:15                           ` Brian Foster
2022-01-09 23:34                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-10 23:37                       ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-11  0:08                         ` Dave Chinner
2022-01-13 17:01                         ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-17 17:24                           ` Trond Myklebust
2022-01-17 17:36                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-04 13:36         ` Brian Foster
2022-01-04 19:23           ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-01-05  2:31 ` [iomap] f5934dda54: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_fs/iomap/buffered-io.c kernel test robot
2022-01-05  2:31   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220105224829.GO945095@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.