From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFB5C433EF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242994AbiAFSsV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 13:48:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60022 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243039AbiAFSsU (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2022 13:48:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E62C061245 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 10:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id c2so3271098pfc.1 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:48:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1jkf2D/5OcklqkJ2q8Z6TSCoQsxm7jevovQ+ZAwIeAw=; b=M4PL4jFbbmj3S4f5lT2PLuKDj9P2+lwhVub7oFhABUButnRu+3wXXpAQvu5iJLm7RB sbTZ6gIr3nWwiPmv98stnaEgvIcAnm14z4bkV0eI7PjBrvNs/P1rOFT6AA5phx9RW49A 9TMRytcyR8nWmB8ZfE8bafStcTz94kmowpQHQNmCXrvSfI2hrLA3YJ2tBM4U/SGJRzN5 x8DwRoyonMGte5ad52HuqgXqIkxtjoivMg1g5m77ETF+SJeRKd31dSk+J0fV13C1NZev WV5nUrI7NyraR2d8ZSLcyF+SNrJCia9cxUdbMpzoX8vyVdLHg8UHuySJNTWUUGciP23J 4f5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1jkf2D/5OcklqkJ2q8Z6TSCoQsxm7jevovQ+ZAwIeAw=; b=m2En51nfkP96NynL85uYoxCcFseRhUNpqDo0bQZxsKYPeWIPRqHwfahRZCgsz2omJ+ kHPpyeJbMIcP2baK0Jx1NfXOHi4fxwJRWCGLR6U3eVJHgoPz5yEBKQnLmBthy0+JSxcX MFjjVSNw4Aq7WU4OFdUXyueLkopq+WlSu+Y7jk2fI3AWWoMFbDf0ncJdwuZVexMpyKYP GnvsjhWdbiKDfI76y2FYPnukQyNnHsKof3i177NiXbU91vRBkRGTkeo8xD3P5MVlRdsF 2Cq6bmuCvfNvN91E+xLtC6AKpjVDx1DCAcfHHuyLUl7H8IsI+SFpd+bP+zT9OtP6mSAO HY8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QQTAN87et00biVKaub36AjsAuT6pbsc2pAv8GHYgS3nljOlIg AHJsmXmhSDectenAq85aEu+GpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfGD+GK2D8Cn5Cqj2wm8/+UrOKMxRKkPDUImmtR9v9jQ4i3tlx7CTzCbMGPZsJZ8M8iICAvg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:198a:b0:4bb:2032:2abd with SMTP id d10-20020a056a00198a00b004bb20322abdmr62125040pfl.2.1641494899796; Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ot6sm3734607pjb.32.2022.01.06.10.48.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Jan 2022 10:48:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:48:16 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] remoteproc: Instantiate the new remoteproc virtio platform device Message-ID: <20220106184816.GB642186@p14s> References: <20211222082349.30378-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20211222082349.30378-7-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211222082349.30378-7-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 09:23:49AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > Migrate from the rvdev device to the rvdev platform device. > From this patch, when a vdev resource is found in the resource table > the remoteproc core register a platform device. > > All reference to the rvdev->dev has been updated to rvdev-pdev->dev > > The use of kref counter is replaced by get/put_device on the remoteproc > virtio device. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > > --- > Update vs previous revision: > - rework comments around virtio platform device creation > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 48 +++++++----- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 - > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 99 ++++++------------------ > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 - > 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index ca2fe8d9cac8..4f332ec0fdd0 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -465,6 +465,8 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > { > struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc = ptr; > struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > + struct rproc_vdev_pdata vdev_data; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev; > int i, ret; > > @@ -484,25 +486,36 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > dev_dbg(dev, "vdev rsc: id %d, dfeatures 0x%x, cfg len %d, %d vrings\n", > rsc->id, rsc->dfeatures, rsc->config_len, rsc->num_of_vrings); > > - /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ > - if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { > - dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + /* Register a remoteproc virtio platform device in charge of the virtio device */ > + vdev_data.rsc_offset = offset; > + vdev_data.id = rsc->id; > + vdev_data.index = rproc->nb_vdev; > > - rvdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rvdev), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rvdev) > - return -ENOMEM; > + pdev = rproc_virtio_register_device(rproc, &vdev_data); > + if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { > + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, > + "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev); The error check and dev_err() message is exactly the same as what is found in rproc_virtio_register_device(). As such two error messages will be printed out for every single failure. I would call platform_device_register_data() directly rather than keeping rproc_virtio_register_device() around. > + } > > - kref_init(&rvdev->refcount); > + /* > + * At this point the registered remoteproc virtio platform device should has been probed. s/has been/have been > + * Get the associated rproc_vdev struct to assign the vrings > + */ > + rvdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + if (WARN_ON(!rvdev)) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto free_rvdev; > + } > > - rvdev->id = rsc->id; > - rvdev->rproc = rproc; > - rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++; > + rproc->nb_vdev++; > > - ret = rproc_rvdev_add_device(rvdev); > - if (ret) > + /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ > + if (rsc->num_of_vrings > ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring)) { > + dev_err(dev, "too many vrings: %d\n", rsc->num_of_vrings); > + ret = -EINVAL; > goto free_rvdev; > + } > > /* parse the vrings */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > @@ -511,9 +524,6 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > goto free_rvdev; > } > > - /* remember the resource offset*/ > - rvdev->rsc_offset = offset; > - > /* allocate the vring resources */ > for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) { > ret = rproc_alloc_vring(rvdev, i); > @@ -527,7 +537,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr, > for (i--; i >= 0; i--) > rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]); > free_rvdev: > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); Here too I wouldn't bother with a new function - I would simply call platform_device_unregister(). > return ret; > } > > @@ -1266,7 +1276,7 @@ void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc) > > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > + rproc_virtio_unregister_device(rvdev); Same as above. > > rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc); > } > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > index 3007d29a26e1..1479c5e33e2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > @@ -36,12 +36,10 @@ int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, > const char **fw_name); > > /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ > -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); > struct platform_device * > rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_pdata *vdev_data); > void rproc_virtio_unregister_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev); > irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); > > /* from remoteproc_debugfs.c */ > void rproc_remove_trace_file(struct dentry *tfile); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > index 5eef679cc520..55e797095bfe 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@ static int copy_dma_range_map(struct device *to, struct device *from) > > static struct rproc_vdev *vdev_to_rvdev(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > - return container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > + struct platform_device *pdev; > + > + pdev = container_of(vdev->dev.parent, struct platform_device, dev); > + > + return platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > } > > static struct rproc *vdev_to_rproc(struct virtio_device *vdev) > @@ -343,13 +347,10 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > { > struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(dev); > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = vdev_to_rvdev(vdev); > - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); > > kfree(vdev); > > - kref_put(&rvdev->refcount, rproc_vdev_release); > - > - put_device(&rproc->dev); > + put_device(&rvdev->pdev->dev); > } > > /** > @@ -365,7 +366,7 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device *dev) > static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > { > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev; > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > struct virtio_device *vdev; > struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > int ret; > @@ -436,17 +437,15 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id) > vdev->dev.release = rproc_virtio_dev_release; > > /* > - * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rproc pointer > + * We're indirectly making a non-temporary copy of the rvdev pointer > * here, because drivers probed with this vdev will indirectly > * access the wrapping rproc. > * > - * Therefore we must increment the rproc refcount here, and decrement > + * Therefore we must increment the rvdev refcount here, and decrement > * it _only_ when the vdev is released. > */ > - get_device(&rproc->dev); > + get_device(dev); > > - /* Reference the vdev and vring allocations */ > - kref_get(&rvdev->refcount); > > ret = register_virtio_device(vdev); > if (ret) { > @@ -488,56 +487,30 @@ static int rproc_vdev_do_start(struct rproc_subdev *subdev) > static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed) > { > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(subdev, struct rproc_vdev, subdev); > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > int ret; > > - ret = device_for_each_child(&rvdev->dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > + ret = device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, rproc_remove_virtio_dev); > if (ret) > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > -} > - > -/** > - * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev > - * > - * @dev: the subdevice's dev > - */ > -static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev) > -{ > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev, dev); > - > - of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev); > - > - kfree(rvdev); > + dev_warn(dev, "can't remove vdev child device: %d\n", ret); > } > > -int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > +static int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > { > struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - char name[16]; > + struct device *dev = &rvdev->pdev->dev; > int ret; > > - snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index); > - rvdev->dev.parent = &rproc->dev; > - rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release; > - dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev->dev.parent), name); > - dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev); > - > - ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev); > - if (ret) { > - put_device(&rvdev->dev); > - return ret; > - } > - ret = copy_dma_range_map(&rvdev->dev, rproc->dev.parent); > + ret = copy_dma_range_map(dev, rproc->dev.parent); > if (ret) > - goto free_rvdev; > + return ret; > > /* Make device dma capable by inheriting from parent's capabilities */ > - set_dma_ops(&rvdev->dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > + set_dma_ops(dev, get_dma_ops(rproc->dev.parent)); > > - ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&rvdev->dev, > - dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > + ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent)); > if (ret) { > - dev_warn(&rvdev->dev, > - "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... (%pe)\n", > dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ERR_PTR(ret)); > } > > @@ -548,34 +521,9 @@ int rproc_rvdev_add_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > > rproc_add_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > > - return 0; > + dev_dbg(dev, "virtio dev %d added\n", rvdev->index); > > -free_rvdev: > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > - return ret; > -} > - > -static void rproc_rvdev_remove_device(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev) > -{ > - struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc; > - > - rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev); > - rproc_unregister_rvdev(rvdev); > - device_unregister(&rvdev->dev); > -} > - > -void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref) > -{ > - struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(ref, struct rproc_vdev, refcount); > - struct rproc_vring *rvring; > - int id; > - > - for (id = 0; id < ARRAY_SIZE(rvdev->vring); id++) { > - rvring = &rvdev->vring[id]; > - rproc_free_vring(rvring); > - } > - > - rproc_rvdev_remove_device(rvdev); > + return 0; > } > > /** > @@ -594,8 +542,7 @@ rproc_virtio_register_device(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_vdev_pdata *vdev_ > pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "rproc-virtio", vdev_data->index, vdev_data, > sizeof(*vdev_data)); > if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev)) { > - dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, > - "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > + dev_err(rproc->dev.parent, "failed to create rproc-virtio device\n"); > } > > return pdev; > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index 542a3d4664f2..7951a3e2b62a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ struct rproc_vring { > > /** > * struct rproc_vdev - remoteproc state for a supported virtio device > - * @refcount: reference counter for the vdev and vring allocations > * @subdev: handle for registering the vdev as a rproc subdevice > * @pdev: remoteproc virtio platform device > - * @dev: device struct used for reference count semantics > * @id: virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h) > * @node: list node > * @rproc: the rproc handle > @@ -626,11 +624,9 @@ struct rproc_vring { > * @index: vdev position versus other vdev declared in resource table > */ > struct rproc_vdev { > - struct kref refcount; > > struct rproc_subdev subdev; > struct platform_device *pdev; > - struct device dev; > > unsigned int id; > struct list_head node; > -- > 2.17.1 >