All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pedro Martelletto <pedro@yubico.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpg-interface: trim CR from ssh-keygen
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:28:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220110122859.3x37a7xdbmcsmuvm@fs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cQMP_Ppg6uywAcFhaVqSoa71dD6UjXbUtC-bvK0WzJnZA@mail.gmail.com>

On 09.01.2022 15:49, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:36 AM Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de> wrote:
>> On 05.01.2022 02:09, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> >> >      line = strchrnul(line + 1, '\n')) {
>> >> >       while (*line == '\n')
>> >> >               line++;
>> >> >       if (!*line)
>> >> >               break;
>> >
>> >Indeed, the existing code is confusing me. I've been staring at it for
>> >several minutes and I think I'm still failing to understand the
>> >purpose of the +1 in the strchrnul() call. Perhaps I'm missing
>> >something obvious(?).
>>
>> This whole loop was basically copied from parse_gpg_output() above. Without
>> the +1 this would always find the same line in the buffer. The +1 skips over
>> the previously found LF.
>
>I still don't see the point of +1 in the strchrnul() call. After:
>
>    line = strchrnul(line + 1, '\n'))
>
>`line` is going to point either at '\n' or at NUL. Then:
>
>    while (*line == '\n')
>        line++;
>
>skips over the '\n' if present. So, by the time the next loop
>iteration starts, `line` will already be pointing past the '\n' we
>just found, thus the +1 seems pointless (and maybe even buggy).
>
>But perhaps I have a blind spot and am missing something obvious...

Hm, yeah. I think you are correct. The while below should make the +1 
unnecessary. I think this never mattered to parse_gpg_output() since it is 
only looking for the [GNUPG:] status line which probably comes first anyway.  
If it does not then I think the loop will skip over it. Same thing with ssh 
(but we are changing this whole loop anyway)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-10 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03 13:31 [PATCH] gpg-interface: trim CR from ssh-keygen -Y find-principals Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2021-12-03 14:18 ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-03 15:58 ` Jeff King
2021-12-04 13:11   ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-05  5:50     ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]       ` <CABPYr=y+sDDko9zPxQTOM6Tz4E7CafH7hJc6oB1zv7XYA9KH1A@mail.gmail.com>
2021-12-09 16:33         ` Fabian Stelzer
     [not found]           ` <CABPYr=xfotWvTQK9k1eKHa0kP4SsB=TKKuM0d8cpMb5BtuUZLA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-12-09 17:20             ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-30 10:25             ` Fabian Stelzer
2021-12-05 23:06     ` Damien Miller
2021-12-06  8:39       ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03  9:53 ` [PATCH v2] gpg-interface: trim CR from ssh-keygen Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-03 17:17   ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-03 23:34     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04  0:41       ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-04  1:19         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04  3:06           ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-04 12:55             ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-04 19:33               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-05  7:09                 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-05 10:36                   ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-05 20:40                     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-06 10:26                       ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-06 17:50                         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-09 20:49                     ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-10 12:28                       ` Fabian Stelzer [this message]
2022-01-07  9:07   ` [PATCH v3] " Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-09 21:37     ` Eric Sunshine
2022-01-10 12:59       ` Fabian Stelzer
2022-01-10 17:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-10 17:03       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220110122859.3x37a7xdbmcsmuvm@fs \
    --to=fs@gigacodes.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=pedro@yubico.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.