From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1B6C433FE for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351020AbiALGk6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:40:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53586 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237188AbiALGk4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:40:56 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CF0C061748 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id q25so5857858edb.2 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j6hbyKol68wFX5iiymhuEQsHgpNKkmkI3FMm7bj3TOM=; b=DEtq4nScoRmZpHDPIBFDzULWTmc5oEnWu0HWl9mQoRoTBM/ad+z67adCChiy1HP+pi Mjg76DatHzF73HgPRTkNFeVunycvIIrnPHK779ME6ig3sk4t9yTZcHn++pQulQo1u6Og DbWzyLfYG5f49VrhQgdqFb/MuIFgl/WUeFAQTGJl/LFgzVifoBOEP2obm0yPedSGnpyp Pq5ybK7XZ5Da8x4DaO5dOZmka175e9kebZLXISJdscKlODyPDME40gTkt+O3Uk4IFQx6 zVUXDFXfWJ0mE6jE2Jmx7lUJt1hQmAE/k2d9KoTKwEwgt8g5+h/xsBMjs4qSLFRHaPwu IdGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j6hbyKol68wFX5iiymhuEQsHgpNKkmkI3FMm7bj3TOM=; b=sVpDiwgTg2X6wbNlOuR9VTO40OqmJ03eZ0R8a4+8Y2B+BumuaiUa+yxn/h/9Z8Nx0J k2Ydst2ZjnJ5493SpH233+igmWINtXBsRXtQzbQqGicWPex+AKNUydqvsfq6wEqi0w/m XKZw3SujXkjNQfRY2p73nc67sLA+1GUU6KZN1RZw5gzF4O918u/gf73q27UqRIVctUPl 4x4lodcpO/yK283D/cRoBV+nrJSJ0FpODKwVMTFY4eITxiAWIx+6IqXKk933CDLsw45t u25xLYizSd7ySIfzy1x45qADfZWZ5/hl1oR2nw7K63qWNXCx6oNlXI4i9801jdFZ1648 NSrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Loxy5IYbzcsGQSVUoD8PtXtmhAYLvTHN9kqv0p5yM1+IkPBmO EK0/lVvNhcMXzUG4OTrjiohd2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFACxwQqohWAwzNyIFzdza3Go5zCu+23kAyqd4VttcVfMxPX4biC1GqarDCqok0lezkQ4qEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d6d5:: with SMTP id l21mr7486410edj.69.1641969653736; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from leoy-ThinkPad-X240s ([104.245.96.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck3sm1892109edb.36.2022.01.11.22.40.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:40:47 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Leon Romanovsky , Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , Alexander Shishkin , Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, Paul Moore , Eric Paris , Balbir Singh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-audit@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pid: Introduce helper task_is_in_root_ns() Message-ID: <20220112064046.GA3316542@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> References: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:33:13PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > The kernel uses open code to check if a process is in root PID namespace > or not in several places. > > Suggested by Suzuki, this patch set is to create a helper function > task_is_in_init_pid_ns() to replace open code. > > This patch set has been applied on the mainline kernel and built for > Arm64 kernel with enabling all relevant modules. I'd like sync for how to merging this patch set. Except patch 05/07, all of other patches in this patch set have been received the reviewed or acked tags. So could you pick up this patch set? Furthermore, we have another patch set "coresight: etm: Correct PID tracing for non-root namespace" [1], which is dependent on the current patch set and it has been Acked by Suzuki. I'd like to get opinions from David and CoreSight maintainers Mathieu and Suzuki, should we merge the patch set [1] via David's tree as well to avoid dependency issue, or prefer to merge it via CoreSight tree? If David prefers the prior option, I can resend the patch set [1] with looping David. Thanks, Leo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213121323.1887180-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6061C433EF for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:42:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3U1Gcji/gjvkm/34pnfWNIE9nVeM8eiKFnIWslMFtJg=; b=jqam935Lzx9VCJ vg1U1belnBCc3iVkfJdZh6Kl7xy4enMk4LJSa+9+3I9Cl2v8xPKXlgJYkN7LwV2KfYfldTyc2d2oZ 2BBngU+NMnspeYZBy6KbPypkUcNS0a2jTqs+klwdds3sQ6LTEwjQw9nbQGBq8go07D+hDDHgaCBLK HG3valGkTjM/WXxuIDpMJnrVoO4Ms4bsJCqozbxEF0eLK4DFhUdBCa2FsHg/9iDVfmba2SLFrFWw9 1F6VBzbU02a9WneQX49qmPnJAZQxMOXstUNjyuuXhMOTsuvA2OuUKyL3hYw75Ik+MgdFVxekgqYzw NcFfnK7L5ddXhF5BJcvA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7XJb-001JMA-30; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:40:59 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7XJY-001JLa-3h for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:40:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id m4so5696784edb.10 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j6hbyKol68wFX5iiymhuEQsHgpNKkmkI3FMm7bj3TOM=; b=DEtq4nScoRmZpHDPIBFDzULWTmc5oEnWu0HWl9mQoRoTBM/ad+z67adCChiy1HP+pi Mjg76DatHzF73HgPRTkNFeVunycvIIrnPHK779ME6ig3sk4t9yTZcHn++pQulQo1u6Og DbWzyLfYG5f49VrhQgdqFb/MuIFgl/WUeFAQTGJl/LFgzVifoBOEP2obm0yPedSGnpyp Pq5ybK7XZ5Da8x4DaO5dOZmka175e9kebZLXISJdscKlODyPDME40gTkt+O3Uk4IFQx6 zVUXDFXfWJ0mE6jE2Jmx7lUJt1hQmAE/k2d9KoTKwEwgt8g5+h/xsBMjs4qSLFRHaPwu IdGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j6hbyKol68wFX5iiymhuEQsHgpNKkmkI3FMm7bj3TOM=; b=tR1TgE7Yy4NcsEeQhV+JzTDLv6Ua3vHrdeBczxGXdnBzR4GQGOHA6vijHSKJY692JN dh7j3ifEcw/81EHy5+J+umlmD3wsdsIvBdFdBnrkZyAuSzyNgl/tr5uPSW40N7H5pom3 1abJAdyQMLrpDj42aB2stKT/sdKaC7lsyPtrMK6vXYG+lAL68etN6OWpavsUncfVYj1P SC88m+pDpsI2CEs+My6oHtrAkP45pPaO+N6K9iPA3J4G+F20rM5KCg0ZKivol5RspU4r qi0KpJkdsOTFLqAMmV6xG+1LB24DtG0WKyl1N3clJHLemHVlTEdSHs0ASVHiR2DYCTUd Luqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tgBS7GTGTkVA/ehT9vtphj8a+flUelHzaIcX5rrAJ20d5MCcY kPUDYnjGzRpenzGo0hT5fxe8Ew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFACxwQqohWAwzNyIFzdza3Go5zCu+23kAyqd4VttcVfMxPX4biC1GqarDCqok0lezkQ4qEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d6d5:: with SMTP id l21mr7486410edj.69.1641969653736; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from leoy-ThinkPad-X240s ([104.245.96.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck3sm1892109edb.36.2022.01.11.22.40.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:40:47 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Leon Romanovsky , Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , Alexander Shishkin , Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, Paul Moore , Eric Paris , Balbir Singh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-audit@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pid: Introduce helper task_is_in_root_ns() Message-ID: <20220112064046.GA3316542@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> References: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220111_224056_231385_2127DC7F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi David, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:33:13PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > The kernel uses open code to check if a process is in root PID namespace > or not in several places. > > Suggested by Suzuki, this patch set is to create a helper function > task_is_in_init_pid_ns() to replace open code. > > This patch set has been applied on the mainline kernel and built for > Arm64 kernel with enabling all relevant modules. I'd like sync for how to merging this patch set. Except patch 05/07, all of other patches in this patch set have been received the reviewed or acked tags. So could you pick up this patch set? Furthermore, we have another patch set "coresight: etm: Correct PID tracing for non-root namespace" [1], which is dependent on the current patch set and it has been Acked by Suzuki. I'd like to get opinions from David and CoreSight maintainers Mathieu and Suzuki, should we merge the patch set [1] via David's tree as well to avoid dependency issue, or prefer to merge it via CoreSight tree? If David prefers the prior option, I can resend the patch set [1] with looping David. Thanks, Leo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213121323.1887180-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/ _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5134C433F5 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-126-P7btjhFxPNqwqXRvP-IGWw-1; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:51:23 -0500 X-MC-Unique: P7btjhFxPNqwqXRvP-IGWw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A1D93921; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62E523784; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756674BB7C; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 20C6f1J9007877 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:41:01 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E587F2166B4D; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05372166B2F for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A0C1064FAD for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 06:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f53.google.com (mail-ed1-f53.google.com [209.85.208.53]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-221-qw6l_CMWNHSsTSzIiqVRvA-1; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:40:55 -0500 X-MC-Unique: qw6l_CMWNHSsTSzIiqVRvA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f53.google.com with SMTP id w16so5710360edc.11 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=j6hbyKol68wFX5iiymhuEQsHgpNKkmkI3FMm7bj3TOM=; b=HAFk3pqPDOypUo42zUIoqMKFo/jZ7sJwG2PqT8613kDhasIe8HqXNXu5waHI52JGwD ZeUMcrADG4/EQXB4pFHn08FGHp0Fuc87E18FH2rWo4t1637H1rx1lnORDX+3eyB2t5VV hb3xXkQtsrhrOaWlA2P+dFEGSwJlfHiVdSao6ZUUrdTq/m1QkxHPPukeMG+eQ7YzUGF2 3HvdiDCgFMAzmQ+LU68BxNDSo94ldsadAMVZpsAgGGTSWCBFKOOpRgpuaSNP9ljIPUyb AGYv5iELwDnMxCvIC+dahNANv7uxOa2WpXZffGljViiUJjML85cuINzgHVq/Cm8ucu0t vcMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QWJJaBFfqM062pJVgCexAl59cBSqyCTr43teBM+9OnThA8Tb8 UVTuJkLZayiioMldqn4lvhPHwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFACxwQqohWAwzNyIFzdza3Go5zCu+23kAyqd4VttcVfMxPX4biC1GqarDCqok0lezkQ4qEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d6d5:: with SMTP id l21mr7486410edj.69.1641969653736; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from leoy-ThinkPad-X240s ([104.245.96.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck3sm1892109edb.36.2022.01.11.22.40.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:40:47 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Leon Romanovsky , Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , Alexander Shishkin , Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, Paul Moore , Eric Paris , Balbir Singh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, codalist@telemann.coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-audit@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pid: Introduce helper task_is_in_root_ns() Message-ID: <20220112064046.GA3316542@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> References: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211208083320.472503-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.6 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 08:51:11 -0500 X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi David, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:33:13PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > The kernel uses open code to check if a process is in root PID namespace > or not in several places. > > Suggested by Suzuki, this patch set is to create a helper function > task_is_in_init_pid_ns() to replace open code. > > This patch set has been applied on the mainline kernel and built for > Arm64 kernel with enabling all relevant modules. I'd like sync for how to merging this patch set. Except patch 05/07, all of other patches in this patch set have been received the reviewed or acked tags. So could you pick up this patch set? Furthermore, we have another patch set "coresight: etm: Correct PID tracing for non-root namespace" [1], which is dependent on the current patch set and it has been Acked by Suzuki. I'd like to get opinions from David and CoreSight maintainers Mathieu and Suzuki, should we merge the patch set [1] via David's tree as well to avoid dependency issue, or prefer to merge it via CoreSight tree? If David prefers the prior option, I can resend the patch set [1] with looping David. Thanks, Leo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213121323.1887180-1-leo.yan@linaro.org/ -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit