All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com, realwakka@gmail.com
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: pi433: validate min/max bit rate settings
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:58:49 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117055849.GA10644@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202201162116.8r1xEw9q-lkp@intel.com>

RF69 chip supports different bit rate settings depending on which frequency
modulation is used. Failing to correctly validate bit rate can lead to a 
silent failure and cause packets not to be read/sent.

This series change the order in which the rf69 chip is configured and add
max bit rate validation.

Patch dependency:

This series depend on these patches as they change the same set of files:

- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220108212728.GA7784@mail.google.com/
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220114221643.GA7843@mail.google.com/

Changelog:

v2: change bitrate variable type to u32 as pointed by kernel test bot
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220116001726.GA22699@mail.google.com/

Paulo Miguel Almeida (3):
  staging: pi433: fix validation for min bit rate supported by the
    device
  staging: pi433: change order in which driver config the rf69 chip
  staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used

 drivers/staging/pi433/pi433_if.c |  8 ++++----
 drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.c     | 16 ++++++++++++----
 drivers/staging/pi433/rf69.h     |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.4


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-16  0:17 [PATCH 0/3] staging: pi433: validate min/max bit rate settings Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-16  0:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: pi433: fix validation for min bit rate supported by the device Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-16  0:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: pi433: change order in which driver config the rf69 chip Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-16  0:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-16 14:06   ` kernel test robot
2022-01-16 14:06     ` kernel test robot
2022-01-17  5:58     ` Paulo Miguel Almeida [this message]
2022-01-17  6:00       ` [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: pi433: fix validation for min bit rate supported by the device Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-17  6:01       ` [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: pi433: change order in which driver config the rf69 chip Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-17  6:02       ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-18 13:59         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-18 19:34           ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-18 23:03             ` [PATCH v3 0/3] staging: pi433: validate min/max bit rate settings Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-18 23:04               ` [PATCH v3 1/3] staging: pi433: fix validation for min bit rate supported by the device Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-18 23:05               ` [PATCH v3 2/3] staging: pi433: change order in which driver config the rf69 chip Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-18 23:05               ` [PATCH v3 3/3] staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-19  6:04               ` [PATCH v3 0/3] staging: pi433: validate min/max bit rate settings Dan Carpenter
2022-01-23  7:43                 ` Paulo Miguel Almeida
2022-01-24  8:53                   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-01-19  5:34             ` [PATCH v2 3/3] staging: pi433: validate max bit_rate based on modulation used Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220117055849.GA10644@mail.google.com \
    --to=paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=realwakka@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.