From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF8EC433F5 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349272AbiARUeQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:34:16 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:44688 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349270AbiARUeQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:34:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1F3612E6; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0977C340E2; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:34:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642538055; bh=a7eQGTBopVPgvTw08Y5Ltm/FC6r6uVERo3wx+LCHqWU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K0kYcIC+ocHAeSmsVl5YVeilSsemMYVs/7FnVOTdy8BPKTGJ0+XeIO4zdy6Oyx6J4 gvmGdbYRFnOthooppITBIhCdgyz5VMNlhhPtotsk+8FANRexcxQrlneor5Q2YVcE2F CmHCmSMPnhWzE9kVLRBpaoU+vVjlqjj6+4M9qvrYzNkQs/td0XTy0Bw7vukTm1DuZ+ SN2TmF8RV4lIv/wxA8jYDpsa4ge4URHBtKkAxkKFeQV2nAfFxcr1+2Y1zvV8+ahhP4 QoUxZxdOFmz9pOqWtG70nLueeiGO/5s15fwqtda/mpO/a215vJJb9Loz0TvuLidvAw 7Zp0zPFUZfPHQ== Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:34:13 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Tobias Waldekranz , davem@davemloft.net, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] net/fsl: xgmac_mdio: Add workaround for erratum A-009885 Message-ID: <20220118123413.70f469bd@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20220116211529.25604-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20220116211529.25604-2-tobias@waldekranz.com> <87czkqdduh.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:00:41 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Should I send a v2 even if nothing else > > pops up, or is this more of a if-you're-sending-a-v2-anyway type of > > comment? > > If you reply with a Fixes: patchwork will automagically append it like > it does Reviewed-by, Tested-by etc. That part is pretty finicky, it's supposed to work but when I apply these I only get review tags from Andrew and a Fixes tag already present on the last patch :( A v2 with Fixes tags included in the posting would be best after all. Thanks! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12421C433EF for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JdgWD1cRRz3bVL for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:35:04 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=K0kYcIC+; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=kuba@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=K0kYcIC+; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JdgVQ07q5z2ymb for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:34:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B7CB81800; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0977C340E2; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:34:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642538055; bh=a7eQGTBopVPgvTw08Y5Ltm/FC6r6uVERo3wx+LCHqWU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K0kYcIC+ocHAeSmsVl5YVeilSsemMYVs/7FnVOTdy8BPKTGJ0+XeIO4zdy6Oyx6J4 gvmGdbYRFnOthooppITBIhCdgyz5VMNlhhPtotsk+8FANRexcxQrlneor5Q2YVcE2F CmHCmSMPnhWzE9kVLRBpaoU+vVjlqjj6+4M9qvrYzNkQs/td0XTy0Bw7vukTm1DuZ+ SN2TmF8RV4lIv/wxA8jYDpsa4ge4URHBtKkAxkKFeQV2nAfFxcr1+2Y1zvV8+ahhP4 QoUxZxdOFmz9pOqWtG70nLueeiGO/5s15fwqtda/mpO/a215vJJb9Loz0TvuLidvAw 7Zp0zPFUZfPHQ== Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:34:13 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] net/fsl: xgmac_mdio: Add workaround for erratum A-009885 Message-ID: <20220118123413.70f469bd@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20220116211529.25604-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20220116211529.25604-2-tobias@waldekranz.com> <87czkqdduh.fsf@waldekranz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net, Tobias Waldekranz Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:00:41 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Should I send a v2 even if nothing else > > pops up, or is this more of a if-you're-sending-a-v2-anyway type of > > comment? > > If you reply with a Fixes: patchwork will automagically append it like > it does Reviewed-by, Tested-by etc. That part is pretty finicky, it's supposed to work but when I apply these I only get review tags from Andrew and a Fixes tag already present on the last patch :( A v2 with Fixes tags included in the posting would be best after all. Thanks!