From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2: Limit requested watermark value to hwfifo size Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 17:04:47 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220122170447.68f35cfa@jic23-huawei> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220117102512.31725-2-paul@crapouillou.net> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:25:12 +0000 Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote: > Instead of returning an error if the watermark value is too high, which > the core will silently ignore anyway, limit the value to the hardware > FIFO size; a lower-than-requested value is still better than using the > default, which is usually 1. There is another potential error condition in this function which will also be ignored by the core. As such whilst I agree this is a sensible thing to do in this particular case I think we should also be handling the error in the core. I think it would be better to clean that up at the same time as these improvements - particularly as I'd guess you have a convenient test setup to check the error unwind is correct? Thanks, Jonathan > > Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > index 854b1f81d807..5cc84f4a17bb 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ static int at91_adc_set_watermark(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int val) > int ret; > > if (val > AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE) > - return -EINVAL; > + val = AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE; > > if (!st->selected_trig->hw_trig) { > dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "we need hw trigger for DMA\n");
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2: Limit requested watermark value to hwfifo size Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 17:04:47 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220122170447.68f35cfa@jic23-huawei> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220117102512.31725-2-paul@crapouillou.net> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:25:12 +0000 Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote: > Instead of returning an error if the watermark value is too high, which > the core will silently ignore anyway, limit the value to the hardware > FIFO size; a lower-than-requested value is still better than using the > default, which is usually 1. There is another potential error condition in this function which will also be ignored by the core. As such whilst I agree this is a sensible thing to do in this particular case I think we should also be handling the error in the core. I think it would be better to clean that up at the same time as these improvements - particularly as I'd guess you have a convenient test setup to check the error unwind is correct? Thanks, Jonathan > > Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> > --- > drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > index 854b1f81d807..5cc84f4a17bb 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c > @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ static int at91_adc_set_watermark(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int val) > int ret; > > if (val > AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE) > - return -EINVAL; > + val = AT91_HWFIFO_MAX_SIZE; > > if (!st->selected_trig->hw_trig) { > dev_dbg(&indio_dev->dev, "we need hw trigger for DMA\n"); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-22 16:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-17 10:25 [PATCH 1/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: " Paul Cercueil 2022-01-17 10:25 ` Paul Cercueil 2022-01-17 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2: " Paul Cercueil 2022-01-17 10:25 ` Paul Cercueil 2022-01-22 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message] 2022-01-22 17:04 ` Jonathan Cameron 2022-06-04 15:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2022-06-04 15:05 ` Jonathan Cameron 2022-06-04 22:41 ` Paul Cercueil 2022-06-04 22:41 ` Paul Cercueil 2022-06-12 8:49 ` Jonathan Cameron 2022-06-12 8:49 ` Jonathan Cameron 2022-01-17 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: " Lorenzo Bianconi 2022-01-17 10:56 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220122170447.68f35cfa@jic23-huawei \ --to=jic23@kernel.org \ --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \ --cc=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \ --cc=lars@metafoo.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \ --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2: Limit requested watermark value to hwfifo size' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.