From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C149C433EF for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D27881F7E; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:27 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UAUgIGv5"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 41CE981F7E; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C4281277 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:21 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pali@kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A69B80CF9; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14A1FC340E2; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:48:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642949300; bh=fMzK/zegB5DV8PxxLFEMQP2fPGXOW+xuVy+hpycSFjQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UAUgIGv5ZTpM4sG8n+/9Y6eOFO70LfhHTisriNg5ExClL29IO+oC3LYXp1yWsedGI ypOAAG5crmVNOv2E49iWth/sdVuj9KYw8NMv4Cdjk5KFCGk14CQU2lbRU7OfBLzHp5 skDjRLrlHKe+y9jpQJyVypIDUASnain9yJdfrQy10vrxNgRgj+JNGvAjn3x3ejXOce 449UrQlufVHKhFwpBz7Lma+0yI86bvzfvDEUPY0Iz1hCYSJZHEmFZa0ZWpIJM5jTmr K9XqPcX16c8bxzbvHqD+q+qShEGKG7TZr0At4TTR7fNg5ojmo6DWbFDvodHON7xfBj X4M0qEXiO7iDw== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 54D76777; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 15:48:17 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Tom Rini Cc: Merlijn Wajer , maemo-leste@lists.dyne.org, Ivaylo Dimitrov , Simon Glass , U-Boot Mailing List , Anatolij Gustschin , Marek =?utf-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Stefan Roese , Stefano Babic Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/23] video: Convert CONFIG_VIDEO_LOGO to Kconfig Message-ID: <20220123144817.jahhrqz5gx42gn2v@pali> References: <20211119202408.1815506-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20211119202408.1815506-18-sjg@chromium.org> <20220122132611.schnplwxozqzd7ys@pali> <20220122152934.GQ7004@bill-the-cat> <20220122154141.hrj7skg45nnhdh2b@pali> <20220122184101.GS7004@bill-the-cat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20220122184101.GS7004@bill-the-cat> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.5 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Saturday 22 January 2022 13:41:01 Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 04:41:42PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Adding other Maemo developers... > > > > On Saturday 22 January 2022 10:29:34 Tom Rini wrote: > > > This is perhaps as good/bad time as any to ask about the conversion > > > efforts for N900 USB things that were discussed before? > > > > Perhaps it is also a good/bad time for reminding that some N900 U-Boot > > patches are waiting for review on the list? :-) > > The last ones I saw weren't clear what it depended on and should get > re-posted. And how should I or anybody else know this if nobody is responding to emails asking for review of pending patches? > But I didn't see anything about the USB DM conversion. Of course, as there are waiting other patches and other emails without replies, it is not a wise idea to start working on something other or starting discussion about something totally new if existing things are waiting for maintainers... I wanted to look at other stuff after pending patches are in accepted state. But I'm not superman to work on 10 parallel things at the same time and specially if I see that reviewing N900 patches is slow and takes about half of year. If I see that maintainer is busy then I send just one patch and next after it is accepted. And not sending thousands of patches at the same time. If I would be in the "busy maintainer" position I also would not like to see thousands of patches waiting from other developers and rather would see one patch and after it is accepted then another patch. So, could you please make a time and look at pending N900 patching? So we can move forward? I have feeling that this is repeating every year and the ball is not on my side. For example I'm still waiting for reply for this email from July 2021: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-July/455710.html And sending reminder for another patch in December 2021 has no reply too: https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-December/468744.html