All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 09:53:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201250952.2C89D08@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220125090152.0c457aae@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:01:52AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:27:32 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > But if this is true, I would imagine there would be plenty of other
> > > warnings? I'm currently stumped.  
> > 
> > That is because __rel_loc is used only in the sample code in the kernel
> > for testing. Other use-cases comes from user-space.
> > Hmm, can we skip this boundary check for this example?
> 
> Is this only checked when __CHECKER__ is defined? If so, would this work?

__CHECKER__ is only for sparse. This is from re-enabling -Warray-bounds
for gcc.

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  3:50 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  7:44 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 13:27   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-25 14:01     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 17:53       ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-01-25 14:31     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-25 15:49       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 17:54       ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 18:41         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 20:57       ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 21:23         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 21:28           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-25 22:07             ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 22:21               ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-26  0:35                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-26  1:16                   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-26  3:18                     ` Kees Cook
2022-01-26  3:26                       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-26 19:41                         ` Beau Belgrave
2022-01-26 21:00                           ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-26  3:52                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-01-26  4:06                       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-26  3:17                   ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 22:01           ` Kees Cook
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-05  3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-05  9:54 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-14  1:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-14  3:07 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-05  2:25 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-05  3:22 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-05  4:24   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01  3:07 Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-01 16:31 ` Kees Cook
2022-07-28 10:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-28 15:12 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-05-05  7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-07 17:18 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-16  7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-17  1:01 ` Linus Walleij
2022-03-17  8:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-03-09 10:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-09 16:52 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-09 16:58   ` Hans de Goede
2022-03-09 17:18     ` Kees Cook
2022-02-28 22:27 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-28 23:02 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02  9:16   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-02  9:16     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-03  7:29     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-03  7:29       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-30 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-31  4:04 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-31  4:59   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-31  6:19     ` Kees Cook
2022-01-31 19:10       ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-01-31 21:06         ` Kees Cook
2022-01-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-30 23:24 ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-31  0:15   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-31  0:20     ` Herbert Xu
2022-01-31  0:41       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  3:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08  4:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-08  6:13     ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25  2:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  3:22   ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-25  3:35 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 14:07 ` David Sterba
2021-09-16  3:34 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-16  6:00 ` Kees Cook
2021-08-26  7:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-26 15:38 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-23  3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-23  3:56 ` David Miller
2020-06-21 13:48 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-21 15:36 ` Kees Cook
2018-07-27  9:02 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27  9:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 10:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-27 12:55     ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 12:55       ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 13:01       ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 13:01         ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 13:27         ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 13:27           ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 16:00           ` Kees Cook
2018-07-30  7:33       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-30 14:47         ` Laura Abbott
2018-07-30 14:47           ` Laura Abbott
2018-07-30 16:37           ` Will Deacon
2018-07-30 16:37             ` Will Deacon
2018-07-31 10:09         ` Will Deacon
2018-07-31 10:09           ` Will Deacon
2018-07-31 11:27           ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-08  5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-08 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2017-11-09  0:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-11-09  0:31     ` Kees Cook
2017-06-20  4:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-20  5:39 ` Kees Cook
2017-06-20  5:42   ` John Johansen
2017-06-20  5:39 ` John Johansen
2017-06-26 18:19   ` Kees Cook
2017-06-27  3:33     ` James Morris
2017-06-27 22:16       ` Kees Cook
2017-06-28  5:48         ` James Morris
2017-06-16  1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-16  2:51 ` Daniel Micay
2017-06-16  2:52   ` Daniel Micay
2017-06-16  3:20   ` Kees Cook
2017-06-16  3:31     ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-19  0:23       ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-19 21:01         ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202201250952.2C89D08@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.