Re: [PATCH 05/10] staging: r8188eu: remove smaller sets of DBG_88E calls from os_dep dir

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 04:04:48PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On 1/25/22 15:59, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:48:32PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> > > Hi Phillip,
> > > 
> > > On 1/25/22 01:44, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > > > Remove all DBG_88E calls from the os_dep directory, other than those in
> > > > os_dep/ioctl_linux.c, as this contains almost 200 on its own so will be
> > > > done in a separate patch for ease of review. These calls do not conform
> > > > to kernel coding standards and are superfluous. Also restructure where
> > > > appropriate to remove no longer needed code left behind by removal of
> > > > these calls. This will allow the eventual removal of the DBG_88E macro
> > > > itself.
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > [code snip]
> > > 
> > > > -	/* 2012-07-11 Move here to prevent the 8723AS-VAU BT auto
> > > > -	 * suspend influence */
> > > > -	if (usb_autopm_get_interface(pusb_intf) < 0)
> > > > -			DBG_88E("can't get autopm:\n");
> > > > -
> > > 
> > > Didn't you make a function change here? I didn't test and also didn't find
> > > any mentions of tests in cover letter.
> > 
> > It is obviously a bug.  Please avoid ask rhetorical questions or someone
> > will answer them.
> > 
> 
> It isn't so obvious for me. Might be Phillip knows something about
> 8723AS-VAU BT (whatever it is) issue.
> 
> I prefer not to say "it's an error", when I am not 100% sure :)

Oh, in that case, well done.  Good job on the review.  :)

regards,
dan carpenter