From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD84C28CF5 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233563AbiAZGmR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:42:17 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:33570 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229699AbiAZGmQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:42:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386E22053D; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pN4wTFA6_a1; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB6520504; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC77380004A; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 148E9318303F; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:42:14 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Jiri Bohac CC: Sabrina Dubroca , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "Mike Maloney" , Eric Dumazet , Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: fix MTU regression Message-ID: <20220126064214.GO1223722@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20220114173133.tzmdm2hy4flhblo3@dwarf.suse.cz> <20220114174058.rqhtuwpfhq6czldn@dwarf.suse.cz> <20220119073519.GJ1223722@gauss3.secunet.de> <20220119091233.pzqdlzpcyicjavk5@dwarf.suse.cz> <20220124154531.GM1223722@gauss3.secunet.de> <20220125094102.ju7bhuplcxnkyv4x@dwarf.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220125094102.ju7bhuplcxnkyv4x@dwarf.suse.cz> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:41:02AM +0100, Jiri Bohac wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > sure; I'll send a v2 with added Fixes: for the original > > > regression (749439bf), which will reappear once b515d263 (which > > > causes the current regression) is reverted. Note this patch needs > > > to be accompanied by the revert! > > > > > > > Btw. this fixes a xfrm issue, but touches only generic IPv6 code. > > > > To which tree should this patch be applied? I can take it to > > > > the ipsec tee, but would also be ok if it is applied directly > > > > to the net tree. > > > > > > b515d263 touches xfrm code; but being a regression maybe we want > > > the fastest track possible? > > > > The patch is already marked as 'awaiting upstream' in patchwork, > > so I'll take it into the ipsec tree. > > OK, thanks! Will you also revert b515d263 in the ipsec tree? You need to send a patch if you want to have this reverted.