[PATCH v2 6/6] mm: remove range parameter from follow_invalidate_pte()

From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com, willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	apopple@nvidia.com, shy828301@gmail.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com,
	hughd@google.com, xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, zwisler@kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: remove range parameter from follow_invalidate_pte()
Date: Wed,  2 Feb 2022 22:33:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220202143307.96282-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220202143307.96282-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

The only user (DAX) of range parameter of follow_invalidate_pte()
is gone, it safe to remove the range paramter and make it static
to simlify the code.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  3 ---
 mm/memory.c        | 23 +++--------------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index d211a06784d5..7895b17f6847 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1814,9 +1814,6 @@ void free_pgd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long addr,
 		unsigned long end, unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling);
 int
 copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma);
-int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-			  struct mmu_notifier_range *range, pte_t **ptepp,
-			  pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp);
 int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	       pte_t **ptepp, spinlock_t **ptlp);
 int follow_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 514a81cdd1ae..e8ce066be5f2 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4869,9 +4869,8 @@ int __pmd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, unsigned long address)
 }
 #endif /* __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED */
 
-int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-			  struct mmu_notifier_range *range, pte_t **ptepp,
-			  pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
+static int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+				 pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
 {
 	pgd_t *pgd;
 	p4d_t *p4d;
@@ -4898,31 +4897,17 @@ int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 		if (!pmdpp)
 			goto out;
 
-		if (range) {
-			mmu_notifier_range_init(range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0,
-						NULL, mm, address & PMD_MASK,
-						(address & PMD_MASK) + PMD_SIZE);
-			mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(range);
-		}
 		*ptlp = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
 		if (pmd_huge(*pmd)) {
 			*pmdpp = pmd;
 			return 0;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(*ptlp);
-		if (range)
-			mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(range);
 	}
 
 	if (pmd_none(*pmd) || unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (range) {
-		mmu_notifier_range_init(range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, NULL, mm,
-					address & PAGE_MASK,
-					(address & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE);
-		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(range);
-	}
 	ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp);
 	if (!pte_present(*ptep))
 		goto unlock;
@@ -4930,8 +4915,6 @@ int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	return 0;
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, *ptlp);
-	if (range)
-		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(range);
 out:
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
@@ -4960,7 +4943,7 @@ int follow_invalidate_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
 	       pte_t **ptepp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
 {
-	return follow_invalidate_pte(mm, address, NULL, ptepp, NULL, ptlp);
+	return follow_invalidate_pte(mm, address, ptepp, NULL, ptlp);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(follow_pte);
 
-- 
2.11.0

