All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	scgl@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 02/17] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations for protected guests
Date: Fri,  4 Feb 2022 16:53:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220204155349.63238-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204155349.63238-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

With upcoming patches, protected guests will be able to trigger secure
storage violations in normal operation.

With upcoming patches, protected guests will be able to trigger secure
storage violations in normal operation. This happens for example if a
protected guest is rebooted with lazy destroy enabled and the new guest
is also protected.

When the new protected guest touches pages that have not yet been
destroyed, and thus are accounted to the previous protected guest, a
secure storage violation is raised.

This patch adds handling of secure storage violations for protected
guests.

This exception is handled by first trying to destroy the page, because
it is expected to belong to a defunct protected guest where a destroy
should be possible. If that fails, a normal export of the page is
attempted.

Therefore, pages that trigger the exception will be made non-secure
before attempting to use them again for a different secure guest.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h |  1 +
 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c      | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/s390/mm/fault.c       | 10 +++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
index 86218382d29c..6b2b33f19abe 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ static inline int is_prot_virt_host(void)
 }
 
 int gmap_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb);
+int gmap_destroy_page(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr);
 int uv_destroy_owned_page(unsigned long paddr);
 int uv_convert_from_secure(unsigned long paddr);
 int uv_convert_owned_from_secure(unsigned long paddr);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index a5425075dd25..2754471cc789 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -334,6 +334,61 @@ int gmap_convert_to_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gmap_convert_to_secure);
 
+/**
+ * gmap_destroy_page - Destroy a guest page.
+ * @gmap the gmap of the guest
+ * @gaddr the guest address to destroy
+ *
+ * An attempt will be made to destroy the given guest page. If the attempt
+ * fails, an attempt is made to export the page. If both attempts fail, an
+ * appropriate error is returned.
+ */
+int gmap_destroy_page(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr)
+{
+	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+	unsigned long uaddr;
+	struct page *page;
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = -EFAULT;
+	mmap_read_lock(gmap->mm);
+
+	uaddr = __gmap_translate(gmap, gaddr);
+	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(uaddr))
+		goto out;
+	vma = vma_lookup(gmap->mm, uaddr);
+	if (!vma)
+		goto out;
+	/*
+	 * Huge pages should not be able to become secure
+	 */
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+		goto out;
+
+	rc = 0;
+	/* we take an extra reference here */
+	page = follow_page(vma, uaddr, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_GET);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(page))
+		goto out;
+	rc = uv_destroy_owned_page(page_to_phys(page));
+	/*
+	 * Fault handlers can race; it is possible that two CPUs will fault
+	 * on the same secure page. One CPU can destroy the page, reboot,
+	 * re-enter secure mode and import it, while the second CPU was
+	 * stuck at the beginning of the handler. At some point the second
+	 * CPU will be able to progress, and it will not be able to destroy
+	 * the page. In that case we do not want to terminate the process,
+	 * we instead try to export the page.
+	 */
+	if (rc)
+		rc = uv_convert_owned_from_secure(page_to_phys(page));
+	put_page(page);
+out:
+	mmap_read_unlock(gmap->mm);
+	return rc;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gmap_destroy_page);
+
 /*
  * To be called with the page locked or with an extra reference! This will
  * prevent gmap_make_secure from touching the page concurrently. Having 2
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index ff16ce0d04ee..47b52e5384f8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -853,6 +853,16 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_non_secure_storage_access);
 
 void do_secure_storage_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	unsigned long gaddr = regs->int_parm_long & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK;
+	struct gmap *gmap = (struct gmap *)S390_lowcore.gmap;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the VM has been rebooted, its address space might still contain
+	 * secure pages from the previous boot.
+	 * Clear the page so it can be reused.
+	 */
+	if (!gmap_destroy_page(gmap, gaddr))
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * Either KVM messed up the secure guest mapping or the same
 	 * page is mapped into multiple secure guests.
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 15:53 [PATCH v7 00/17] KVM: s390: pv: implement lazy destroy for reboot Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 01/17] KVM: s390: pv: leak the topmost page table when destroy fails Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07  8:56   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07  9:02     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 14:33     ` Heiko Carstens
2022-02-07 14:49       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 03/17] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage exceptions for normal guests Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 19:51   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 19:51     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-07  9:40   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 04/17] KVM: s390: pv: refactor s390_reset_acc Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 10:02   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07 10:47     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 10:56       ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07 11:01         ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 05/17] KVM: s390: pv: usage counter instead of flag Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 06/17] KVM: s390: pv: add export before import Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 07/17] KVM: s390: pv: module parameter to fence lazy destroy Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 08/17] KVM: s390: pv: make kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv global Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 10:15   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 09/17] KVM: s390: pv: clear the state without memset Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 10:09   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 10/17] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu_notifier Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 21:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:22     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-02-04 21:22     ` kernel test robot
2022-02-07 11:04   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07 12:16     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 11/17] s390/mm: KVM: pv: when tearing down, try to destroy protected pages Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 12/17] KVM: s390: pv: refactoring of kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 11:06   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 13/17] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs if needed Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 14/17] KVM: s390: pv: asynchronous destroy for reboot Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 15/17] KVM: s390: pv: api documentation for asynchronous destroy Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 14:52   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07 15:17     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 16/17] KVM: s390: pv: add KVM_CAP_S390_PROT_REBOOT_ASYNC Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 14:37   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-07 15:19     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-07 15:40       ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-04 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 17/17] KVM: s390: pv: avoid export before import if possible Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220204155349.63238-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.