All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Radoslaw Burny <rburny@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: Protect lockdep functions with #ifdef
Date: Tue,  8 Feb 2022 10:42:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208184208.79303-5-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208184208.79303-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

With upcoming lock tracepoints config, it'd define some of lockdep
functions without enabling CONFIG_LOCKDEP actually.  The existing code
assumes those functions will be removed by the preprocessor but it's
not the case anymore.  Let's protect the code with #ifdef's explicitly.

Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 33f1106b4f99..405e27385f74 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2279,8 +2279,11 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 	lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * Strictly speaking we should mark the invariant state without holding
 	 * any locks, that is, before these two lock_map_acquire()'s.
@@ -2310,8 +2313,11 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 	 * point will only record its address.
 	 */
 	trace_workqueue_execute_end(work, worker->current_func);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
 	lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
+#endif
 
 	if (unlikely(in_atomic() || lockdep_depth(current) > 0)) {
 		pr_err("BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: %s/0x%08x/%d\n"
@@ -2824,8 +2830,10 @@ void flush_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
 		return;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	lock_map_acquire(&wq->lockdep_map);
 	lock_map_release(&wq->lockdep_map);
+#endif
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 
@@ -3052,6 +3060,7 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 	insert_wq_barrier(pwq, barr, work, worker);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	/*
 	 * Force a lock recursion deadlock when using flush_work() inside a
 	 * single-threaded or rescuer equipped workqueue.
@@ -3066,6 +3075,8 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 		lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 		lock_map_release(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 	}
+#endif
+
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return true;
 already_gone:
@@ -3084,10 +3095,12 @@ static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 	if (WARN_ON(!work->func))
 		return false;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	if (!from_cancel) {
 		lock_map_acquire(&work->lockdep_map);
 		lock_map_release(&work->lockdep_map);
 	}
+#endif
 
 	if (start_flush_work(work, &barr, from_cancel)) {
 		wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
-- 
2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 18:41 [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] locking: Pass correct outer wait type info Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/12] cgroup: rstat: Make cgroup_rstat_cpu_lock name readable Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:46   ` Tejun Heo
2022-02-08 19:16     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:16       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 23:51       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 23:51         ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/12] timer: Protect lockdep functions with #ifdef Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:36   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 20:29     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 21:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 18:42 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2022-02-08 18:48   ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: " Tejun Heo
2022-02-08 19:17     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:38   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42   ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:51   ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-08 18:51     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-02-08 19:22     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:22       ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 13:49       ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-09 13:49         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-02-09 16:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-02-09 16:27           ` [Intel-gfx] " Steven Rostedt
2022-02-09 19:28           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:28             ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] btrfs: change lockdep class size check using ks->names Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:03   ` David Sterba
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] locking: Introduce CONFIG_LOCK_INFO Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] locking/mutex: Init name properly w/ CONFIG_LOCK_INFO Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] locking: Add more static lockdep init macros Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] locking: Add CONFIG_LOCK_TRACEPOINTS option Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 11/12] locking/mutex: Revive fast functions for CONFIG_LOCK_TRACEPOINTS Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09  8:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 20:15     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 18:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] locking: Move lock_acquired() from the fast path Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:14 ` [RFC 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:14   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09  9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09  9:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09  9:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-09 18:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Waiman Long
2022-02-09 18:19     ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 18:19     ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 18:29     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 18:29       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 18:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:02       ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:02         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:02         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:17         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:17           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:37           ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:37             ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:37             ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 19:22         ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:22           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:22           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:28           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:28             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:28             ` [Intel-gfx] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:45             ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:45               ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:45               ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-09 19:56               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:56                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 19:56                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-09 20:17               ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 20:17                 ` Waiman Long
2022-02-09 20:17                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Waiman Long
2022-02-10  0:27                 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  0:27                   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  0:27                   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  2:12                   ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  2:12                     ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10  2:12                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Waiman Long
2022-02-10  9:33                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  9:33                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  9:33                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  0:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  0:32     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  0:32     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-10  9:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  9:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10  9:13       ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-10 19:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 19:14         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 19:27         ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 19:27           ` Waiman Long
2022-02-10 19:27           ` [Intel-gfx] " Waiman Long
2022-02-10 20:10           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-10 20:10             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-02-11  5:57             ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:57               ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:57               ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:55       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:55         ` Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11  5:55         ` [Intel-gfx] " Namhyung Kim
2022-02-11 10:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-11 10:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-11 10:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2022-02-08 19:43 [Intel-gfx] [RFC RESEND 00/12] locking: Separate lock tracepoints from lockdep/lock_stat (v1.1) Namhyung Kim
2022-02-08 19:43 ` [PATCH 04/12] workqueue: Protect lockdep functions with #ifdef Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220208184208.79303-5-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rburny@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.