From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97328C43217 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239621AbiBICjW (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 21:39:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37700 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244859AbiBICSP (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 21:18:15 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D538C06157B for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:18:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2190WSCO007258; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:18:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=kQ6Z0QxvS1qQbNa23IiwLGU+rujxVU0u7T2rdztkayg=; b=iZBPw7NpJUQpTwg8qbUyHXtbpzeCgaDHMQwaGiNgKhIQTS/rf3D2xLiDh4Mh9EptO1zx aRWX3u9eQ5imacIbGUS9HePd+rFTf7GbFOB3JHh/HWJrQ0zgbSCrpSk4IzqNczqh2XdF 65BHj58kY5QKN22F+8XbAT9/SYs21G3TmUUV6sVdBGNhyGJ3vYAyIpPkD1juyvO+EXQ7 PIN9seHn8rOhfAYViwvlY0HVJTavgHw/jD9ox4EkhvQpBweHX5Xo9OQeBsYrAYaA2jMd B/LPNVXYGCGqV85qU1HgIpo9BaZeRu1N3Yzos8JRXmlq1R1eYy5IPGtnzyyNbziiUOFk Vw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e3yq2e0q5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:18:03 +0000 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21929JNv005277; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:18:02 GMT Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e3yq2e0pn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:18:02 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2192CuPh002263; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:18:00 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e1gv9h610-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 02:18:00 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2192Hv3u42336678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:17:57 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571FAA405C; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:17:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD858A405B; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:17:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.lan (unknown [9.171.78.41]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 02:17:56 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Gordeev Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/10] libbpf: Fix accessing the first syscall argument on arm64 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 03:17:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20220209021745.2215452-10-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220209021745.2215452-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220209021745.2215452-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: HGLFKAnx0VyNdojdJ-Q3lCCmix49m26o X-Proofpoint-GUID: P23O6g_05JR0cQridHpd2M_9b3_IPX61 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-08_08,2022-02-07_02,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202090014 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On arm64, the first syscall argument should be accessed via orig_x0 (see arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h). Currently regs[0] is used instead, leading to bpf_syscall_macro test failure. orig_x0 cannot be added to struct user_pt_regs, since its layout is a part of the ABI. Therefore provide access to it only through PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() by using a struct pt_regs flavor. Reported-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h index f364f1f4710e..928f85f7961c 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h @@ -142,8 +142,18 @@ #elif defined(bpf_target_arm64) +struct pt_regs___arm64 { + unsigned long orig_x0; +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); + /* arm64 provides struct user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */ #define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const struct user_pt_regs *)(x)) +#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) ({ \ + _Pragma("GCC error \"PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL() is not supported on arm64, use PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() instead\""); \ + 0l; \ +}) +#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x) \ + BPF_CORE_READ((const struct pt_regs___arm64 *)(x), orig_x0) #define __PT_PARM1_REG regs[0] #define __PT_PARM2_REG regs[1] #define __PT_PARM3_REG regs[2] -- 2.34.1