From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2622CC433FE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 01:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232439AbiBJB2r (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:28:47 -0500 Received: from gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com ([23.128.96.19]:56782 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232357AbiBJB2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:28:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5119420F7C for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id y8so4756575pfa.11 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 17:28:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=128JU9ZRRKnPuOh1w064by2lJFlQlZWtP6zeO7W2M20=; b=YxyHGW3cijYGiVelG0kk5Rirc+2Ql5aHyRwJTENB1M8ffWLL2124U9jfJMLdAUB1hL cbKymfFtvkHWr9Bq/Rw5elxUg3c7gPcR2X4FTlIuERWQW5Tx+MWQVJwSIOD1/+uAKcVp o47cf8bIUr+htME+yhxtKF5DGtRNJxE+z3d7I7K/4MkuQp75XyRMGJaOmLe6PNuheO10 AqNwrklTLuzUKVldlOQ8jNcb87Ge52A3vsKQ6ZzEqkunNTJkAFcamFcWMc6gYLCTli2J H91snKOrpDBIKb4t2BFRTqiQzFHcKfwoh1vzd+BqzX7ocOq853CiHcmAvrQvT/LOTeXK cnTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=128JU9ZRRKnPuOh1w064by2lJFlQlZWtP6zeO7W2M20=; b=xT20TN2S9pSm9z28pTyYhhIDjoUDLgRtUluuT9OigKHDs5nqh2vGxBiFNy7aakpEzk 7AcuoPi0YKO0hZ10fGlx0sZhgn2JoZOXft9F4J9EoHNFnmLSoAdey00na6UpwRsFWIDt rRSNwr3tstQ/Amcn6wN4hWVd1hBkUl4ZCzt/xabDrUC/pYNTeZfj8jBmbhk5mw9YlBK+ oASx4W38Fgn9L3Nm5522pi+pAm01wCZi81RHNmmOgiH2iForMcUhcR2+X6QgZRqhBuFH UX4jBrogjGbUPfOkXo0BUSL1X2KuuF0CIpCXJK/JY10JCgQwiPqCOOhsXx1pJ4tVyRY9 Uv3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XUG/xRxUltS2SvALdCeQpu+VW2JNgnWB3fUVyNKQUMtlefZIg yCERAznoUCWvW0/3q6IBUL9/RKRA5RgklA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybaFb4Eb8AzmsyZ1m5I6l9bqn/p3+yuKJ7d+vHnnwtnN/JADScnkI9eL/bT7S7VwD5HPaDGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:230c:: with SMTP id d12mr4685510plh.74.1644450956731; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from lvondent-mobl4.intel.com (c-71-56-157-77.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [71.56.157.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm3240799pfi.7.2022.02.09.15.55.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 15:55:56 -0800 (PST) From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH BlueZ 4/4] rfcomm-tester: Add test to write big chunks of data Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:55:53 -0800 Message-Id: <20220209235553.150294-4-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220209235553.150294-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> References: <20220209235553.150294-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz This attempts to test traffic similar to OBEX using big chunk of data. --- tools/rfcomm-tester.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/rfcomm-tester.c b/tools/rfcomm-tester.c index ef47904de..650d33cb6 100644 --- a/tools/rfcomm-tester.c +++ b/tools/rfcomm-tester.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct test_data { const void *test_data; unsigned int io_id; uint16_t conn_handle; + uint16_t recv_len; }; struct rfcomm_client_data { @@ -297,7 +298,24 @@ const struct rfcomm_client_data connect_send_success = { .server_channel = 0x0c, .client_channel = 0x0c, .data_len = sizeof(data), - .send_data = data + .send_data = data, +}; + +const uint8_t data_8k[8192] = { [0 ... 1023] = 0x00, + [1024 ... 2047] = 0x01, + [2048 ... 3071] = 0x02, + [3072 ... 4095] = 0x03, + [4096 ... 5119] = 0x04, + [5120 ... 6143] = 0x05, + [6144 ... 7167] = 0x06, + [7168 ... 8191] = 0x07, +}; + +const struct rfcomm_client_data connect_send_8k_success = { + .server_channel = 0x0c, + .client_channel = 0x0c, + .data_len = sizeof(data_8k), + .send_data = data_8k, }; const struct rfcomm_client_data connect_read_success = { @@ -448,7 +466,6 @@ static gboolean rc_connect_cb(GIOChannel *io, GIOCondition cond, ssize_t ret; tester_print("Writing %u bytes of data", cli->data_len); - ret = write(sk, cli->send_data, cli->data_len); if (cli->data_len != ret) { tester_warn("Failed to write %u bytes: %s (%d)", @@ -483,16 +500,29 @@ static void client_hook_func(const void *data, uint16_t len, tester_print("bthost received %u bytes of data", len); - if (cli->data_len != len) { + if (test_data->recv_len + len > cli->data_len) { + tester_print("received more data than expected"); tester_test_failed(); return; } - ret = memcmp(cli->send_data, data, len); - if (ret) + ret = memcmp(cli->send_data + test_data->recv_len, data, len); + if (ret) { tester_test_failed(); - else - tester_test_passed(); + return; + } + + test_data->recv_len += len; + + tester_print("bthost received progress %u/%u", test_data->recv_len, + cli->data_len); + + if (cli->data_len != test_data->recv_len) + return; + + test_data->recv_len = 0; + + tester_test_passed(); } static void server_hook_func(const void *data, uint16_t len, @@ -735,6 +765,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) test_rfcomm("Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write Success", &connect_send_success, setup_powered_client, test_connect); + test_rfcomm("Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 8k Success", + &connect_send_8k_success, setup_powered_client, + test_connect); test_rfcomm("Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Read Success", &connect_read_success, setup_powered_client, test_connect); -- 2.34.1