From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:15:19 -0800 From: Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/exec: Rename file binfmt_script to binfmt_script.py Message-ID: <202202101312.23076F5@keescook> References: <20220210192845.1533204-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220210192845.1533204-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline List-ID: To: Muhammad Usama Anjum Cc: Eric Biederman , Shuah Khan , kernel@collabora.com, kernelci@groups.io, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:28:45AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > Rename file for readability purpose. Update its usage and references. > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum > --- > This path was suggested while review of the following patch. Please > apply it after applying that one first: > selftests/exec: Add non-regular to TEST_GEN_PROGS > --- > tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile | 2 +- > .../exec/{binfmt_script => binfmt_script.py} | 18 +++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > rename tools/testing/selftests/exec/{binfmt_script => binfmt_script.py} (90%) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile > index a89ba6de79870..a0b8688b08369 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/Makefile > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ CFLAGS = -Wall > CFLAGS += -Wno-nonnull > CFLAGS += -D_GNU_SOURCE > > -TEST_PROGS := binfmt_script > +TEST_PROGS := binfmt_script.py > TEST_GEN_PROGS := execveat load_address_4096 load_address_2097152 load_address_16777216 non-regular > TEST_GEN_FILES := execveat.symlink execveat.denatured script subdir > # Makefile is a run-time dependency, since it's accessed by the execveat test > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py > similarity index 90% > rename from tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script > rename to tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py Everything from here up, yes. Thank you! :) All the rest aren't right: it's talking about the binfmt_script subsystem of the kernel, rather than the binfmt_script.py test script file itself. > index 05f94a741c7aa..6f717fedc97bd 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/exec/binfmt_script.py > @@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ foreach my $a (@ARGV) { > ''' > > ## > -# test - produce a binfmt_script hashbang line for testing > +# test - produce a binfmt_script.py hashbang line for testing > # > # @size: bytes for bprm->buf line, including hashbang but not newline > # @good: whether this script is expected to execute correctly > -# @hashbang: the special 2 bytes for running binfmt_script > +# @hashbang: the special 2 bytes for running binfmt_script.py > # @leading: any leading whitespace before the executable path > # @root: start of executable pathname > # @target: end of executable pathname > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ def test(name, size, good=True, leading="", root="./", target="/perl", > global test_num, tests, NAME_MAX > test_num += 1 > if test_num > tests: > - raise ValueError("more binfmt_script tests than expected! (want %d, expected %d)" > + raise ValueError("more binfmt_script.py tests than expected! (want %d, expected %d)" > % (test_num, tests)) > > middle = "" > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ def test(name, size, good=True, leading="", root="./", target="/perl", > if len(newline) > 0: > buf += 'echo this is not really perl\n' > > - script = "binfmt_script-%s" % (name) > + script = "binfmt_script.py-%s" % (name) > open(script, "w").write(buf) > os.chmod(script, 0o755) > > @@ -78,17 +78,17 @@ def test(name, size, good=True, leading="", root="./", target="/perl", > > if proc.returncode == 0 and b'Executed interpreter' in stdout: > if good: > - print("ok %d - binfmt_script %s (successful good exec)" > + print("ok %d - binfmt_script.py %s (successful good exec)" > % (test_num, name)) > else: > - print("not ok %d - binfmt_script %s succeeded when it should have failed" > + print("not ok %d - binfmt_script.py %s succeeded when it should have failed" > % (test_num, name)) > else: > if good: > - print("not ok %d - binfmt_script %s failed when it should have succeeded (rc:%d)" > + print("not ok %d - binfmt_script.py %s failed when it should have succeeded (rc:%d)" > % (test_num, name, proc.returncode)) > else: > - print("ok %d - binfmt_script %s (correctly failed bad exec)" > + print("ok %d - binfmt_script.py %s (correctly failed bad exec)" > % (test_num, name)) > > # Clean up crazy binaries > @@ -167,5 +167,5 @@ test(name="two-under-leading", size=int(SIZE/2), leading=" ") > test(name="two-under-lead-trunc-arg", size=int(SIZE/2), leading=" ", arg=" ") > > if test_num != tests: > - raise ValueError("fewer binfmt_script tests than expected! (ran %d, expected %d" > + raise ValueError("fewer binfmt_script.py tests than expected! (ran %d, expected %d" > % (test_num, tests)) > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Kees Cook