From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BDCC433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347877AbiBKIAe (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 03:00:34 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:59286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347871AbiBKIAb (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 03:00:31 -0500 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDCCBD2 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:29 -0800 (PST) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 21B80NNG0023919, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36504.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 21B80NNG0023919 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:00:23 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:00:22 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.21.69.188) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:00:22 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , Subject: [PATCH 4/6] rtw89: add 6G support to rate adaptive mechanism Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:59:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20220211075953.40421-5-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220211075953.40421-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20220211075953.40421-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [172.21.69.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 02/11/2022 07:45:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5?B?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzIvMTEgpFekyCAwNjowMDowMA==?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36504.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Construct rate mask of 6G band, and rate adaptive mechanism can work well on this band. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c index c491a11536815..69668108e19f3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c @@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ static u64 rtw89_phy_ra_mask_cfg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_sta *rtw cfg_mask = u64_encode_bits(mask->control[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ].legacy, RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES); break; + case RTW89_BAND_6G: + band = NL80211_BAND_6GHZ; + cfg_mask = u64_encode_bits(mask->control[NL80211_BAND_6GHZ].legacy, + RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES); + break; default: rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "unhandled band type %d\n", hal->current_band_type); return -1; @@ -254,15 +259,25 @@ static void rtw89_phy_ra_sta_update(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, ldpc_en = 1; } - if (rtwdev->hal.current_band_type == RTW89_BAND_2G) { + switch (rtwdev->hal.current_band_type) { + case RTW89_BAND_2G: ra_mask |= sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ]; if (sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] <= 0xf) mode |= RTW89_RA_MODE_CCK; else mode |= RTW89_RA_MODE_CCK | RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM; - } else { + break; + case RTW89_BAND_5G: ra_mask |= (u64)sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] << 4; mode |= RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM; + break; + case RTW89_BAND_6G: + ra_mask |= (u64)sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_6GHZ] << 4; + mode |= RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM; + break; + default: + rtw89_err(rtwdev, "Unknown band type\n"); + break; } ra_mask_bak = ra_mask; -- 2.25.1