All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Markus Blöchl" <Markus.Bloechl@ipetronik.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme: prevent hang on surprise removal of NVMe disk
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:18:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220216111841.jaunxn6blouzjleg@ipetronik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215191731.GB25076@lst.de>

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 08:17:31PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:51:07AM +0100, Markus Blöchl wrote:
> > After the surprise removal of a mounted NVMe disk the pciehp task
> > reliably hangs forever with a trace similar to this one:
> 
> Do you have a specific reproducer? At least with doing a
> 
> echo 1 > /sys/.../remove
> 
> while running fsx on a file system I can't actually reproduce it.

We built our own enclosures with a custom connector to plug the disks.

So an external enclosure for thunderbolt is probably very similar.
(or just ripping an unscrewed NVMe out of the M.2 ...)

But as already suggested, qemu might also be very useful here as it also
allows us to test multiple namespaces and multipath I/O, if you/someone
wants to check those too (hotplug with multipath I/O really scares me).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-14  9:51 [RFC PATCH] nvme: prevent hang on surprise removal of NVMe disk Markus Blöchl
2022-02-15 15:22 ` Keith Busch
2022-02-15 18:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 19:14     ` Keith Busch
2022-02-15 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 19:37   ` Keith Busch
2022-02-16  6:39   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-16 11:18   ` Markus Blöchl [this message]
2022-02-16 11:32     ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-15 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-16 12:59   ` Markus Blöchl
2022-02-16 13:33     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220216111841.jaunxn6blouzjleg@ipetronik.com \
    --to=markus.bloechl@ipetronik.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.