On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:12:49AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/02/2022 07:20, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:58:35PM +0000, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >>
> >> Add device tree bindings for the Microchip fpga fabric based "core" PWM
> >> controller.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> > 
> > I like it:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > 
> > nitpick: Put your S-o-b last in the commit log. (This doesn't justify a
> > resend IMHO)
> 
> It should be the opposite - the first. First author signs the patch,
> then comes review and finally an ack. Putting SoB at then suggests that
> tags were accumulated before sending patch, out of mailing list.

well, or in an earlier revision of this patch as is the case here. One
of the ideas of S-o-b is that the order shows the flow of the patch
states and if this patch ends in git with:

	Referred-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
	Singed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
	Backed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
	Singed-off-by: Peter Maintainer <pm@example.com>

I'd expect that Backed-by was added by Peter, not Conor.
(Modified the tags on purpose to not interfere with b4's tag pickup, I
guess you humans still get the point.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |