All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	jasowang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared whilst still in use
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:35:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220302083413-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302093446.pjq3djoqi434ehz4@sgarzare-redhat>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:34:46AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:54:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> > to vhost_get_vq_desc().  All we have to do is take the same lock
> > during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
> > 
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
> 
> This issue is similar to [1] that should be already fixed upstream by [2].
> 
> However I think this patch would have prevented some issues, because
> vhost_vq_reset() sets vq->private to NULL, preventing the worker from
> running.
> 
> Anyway I think that when we enter in vhost_dev_cleanup() the worker should
> be already stopped, so it shouldn't be necessary to take the mutex. But in
> order to prevent future issues maybe it's better to take them, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> 
> [1]
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=993d8b5e64393ed9e6a70f9ae4de0119c605a822
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a58da53ffd70294ebea8ecd0eb45fd0d74add9f9


Right. I want to queue this but I would like to get a warning
so we can detect issues like [2] before they cause more issues.


> > 
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > index 59edb5a1ffe28..bbaff6a5e21b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > 	int i;
> > 
> > 	for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx)
> > 			eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx);
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->kick)
> > @@ -700,6 +701,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx)
> > 			eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx);
> > 		vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs[i]);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> > 	}
> > 	vhost_dev_free_iovecs(dev);
> > 	if (dev->log_ctx)
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
> > 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared whilst still in use
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:35:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220302083413-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302093446.pjq3djoqi434ehz4@sgarzare-redhat>

On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:34:46AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:54:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > vhost_vsock_handle_tx_kick() already holds the mutex during its call
> > to vhost_get_vq_desc().  All we have to do is take the same lock
> > during virtqueue clean-up and we mitigate the reported issues.
> > 
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=279432d30d825e63ba00
> 
> This issue is similar to [1] that should be already fixed upstream by [2].
> 
> However I think this patch would have prevented some issues, because
> vhost_vq_reset() sets vq->private to NULL, preventing the worker from
> running.
> 
> Anyway I think that when we enter in vhost_dev_cleanup() the worker should
> be already stopped, so it shouldn't be necessary to take the mutex. But in
> order to prevent future issues maybe it's better to take them, so:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> 
> [1]
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=993d8b5e64393ed9e6a70f9ae4de0119c605a822
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a58da53ffd70294ebea8ecd0eb45fd0d74add9f9


Right. I want to queue this but I would like to get a warning
so we can detect issues like [2] before they cause more issues.


> > 
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > index 59edb5a1ffe28..bbaff6a5e21b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> > @@ -693,6 +693,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > 	int i;
> > 
> > 	for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > +		mutex_lock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx)
> > 			eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->error_ctx);
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->kick)
> > @@ -700,6 +701,7 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > 		if (dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx)
> > 			eventfd_ctx_put(dev->vqs[i]->call_ctx.ctx);
> > 		vhost_vq_reset(dev, dev->vqs[i]);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&dev->vqs[i]->mutex);
> > 	}
> > 	vhost_dev_free_iovecs(dev);
> > 	if (dev->log_ctx)
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
> > 

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02  7:54 [PATCH 1/1] vhost: Protect the virtqueue from being cleared whilst still in use Lee Jones
2022-03-02  7:54 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02  9:34 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02  9:34   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 10:07   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 10:07     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 13:35   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-03-02 13:35     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:11     ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 14:11       ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 14:50       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:50         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 15:36         ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 15:36           ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-04 16:46           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 16:46             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 13:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 13:30   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 13:56   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 13:56     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 14:51     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:51       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 14:57       ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 14:57         ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 16:28         ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 16:28           ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 16:30           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 16:30             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-02 16:49             ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 16:49               ` Lee Jones
2022-03-02 17:10               ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-02 17:10                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-03-03 14:17                 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-03 14:17                   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04  5:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04  5:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 15:22   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04 15:22     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 16:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-04 16:56   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-04 16:56     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-07 19:17 Lee Jones
2022-03-07 19:17 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-07 19:33 ` Greg KH
2022-03-07 19:33   ` Greg KH
2022-03-07 22:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-07 22:39     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  8:10   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:10     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:11     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:11       ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:57     ` Greg KH
2022-03-08  8:57       ` Greg KH
2022-03-08  9:15       ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  9:15         ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  9:57         ` Greg KH
2022-03-08  9:57           ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 10:08           ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 10:08             ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 10:55           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 10:55             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:45             ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 11:45               ` Greg KH
2022-03-08 12:27               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 12:27                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 13:17                 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 13:17                   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 17:17                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 17:17                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:05         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-09 18:52       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-09 18:52         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-07 22:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-07 22:37   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  8:01   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:01     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 11:07     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:07       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08  6:15 ` Jason Wang
2022-03-08  6:15   ` Jason Wang
2022-03-08  8:08   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08  8:08     ` Lee Jones
2022-03-08 11:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-08 11:06       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-14  8:43 Lee Jones
2022-03-14  8:43 ` Lee Jones
2022-03-14  8:56 ` Greg KH
2022-03-14  8:56   ` Greg KH
2022-03-14 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-14 11:49   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-03-14 12:47   ` Lee Jones
2022-03-14 12:47     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220302083413-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+adc3cb32385586bec859@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.