From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CAB33E1 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 222CmsWC032302; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:50:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=B5h+yk1eDqBaRQMCV7KsLpOyCJCHJJ8oRwm7Xksl3Do=; b=OYIru8f1kteZArcaKgBNenhEUJzwpiEbjfecrYzD+qBI9aBqabt6G2wUlDPBo+Wj/FSI rtL70ygyVfOG//UBL1s+yEDXhmumOkeVWS0lCwTrbklkdhA8bA+PlT5XD8+cwdW1TBqE GE40e2DaHqJkySF5qiUNBdYvBzG4D5lK0/bPT57Hef2H6SsvR5w4M7/WPa5i04iSXKpc kjOOvBw1mn0MBT6ln+Luyx7jKG9PzxEjm+x+AMv8U58hFFuTFtYWcLRLxj8JQYFQfJ1r wXoFYCcGWHdCEtMQpv5wlByGS6HgOpPZ96zP5bVfc4/6Ix89HeWfGLnmzMQVwSbnyp6d UA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ej8wt9933-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:50:01 +0000 Received: from m0098393.ppops.net (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 222DftSa012454; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:50:01 GMT Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ej8wt992h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:50:01 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 222Dm7QH019600; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:50:00 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3efbua5y4a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 13:50:00 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 222Dnw7540042814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:49:58 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CBB3112070; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B29E11206B; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:49:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbct-3.pok.ibm.com (unknown [9.47.158.153]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:49:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Stefan Berger To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: zohar@linux.ibm.com, serge@hallyn.com, christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, containers@lists.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, mpeters@redhat.com, lhinds@redhat.com, lsturman@redhat.com, puiterwi@redhat.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, jamjoom@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paul-moore.com, rgb@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, Stefan Berger Subject: [PATCH v11 11/27] ima: Switch to lazy lsm policy updates for better performance Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:46:46 -0500 Message-Id: <20220302134703.1273041-12-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220302134703.1273041-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220302134703.1273041-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: containers@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: S3b5uWcQgAGHarhGdapis5ghoXGCJR0C X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: zpxKoZsu_n6XvAJXOAP_vRA0TiKN3PEP X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-02_06,2022-02-26_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2203020057 Instead of calling ima_lsm_update_rules() for every namespace upon invocation of the ima_lsm_policy_change() notification function, only set a flag in a namespace and defer the call to ima_lsm_update_rules() to before the policy is accessed the next time, which is either in ima_policy_start(), when displaying the policy via the policy file in securityfs, or when calling ima_match_policy(). The performance numbers before this change for a test enabling and disabling an SELinux module was as follows with a given number of IMA namespaces that each a have a policy containing 2 rules with SELinux labels: 2: ~9s 192: ~11s 1920: ~80s With this change: 2: ~6.5s 192: ~7s 1920: ~8.3s Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 ++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index c68b5117d034..5bf7f080c2be 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -123,6 +123,10 @@ struct ima_h_table { }; struct ima_namespace { + unsigned long ima_ns_flags; +/* Bit numbers for above flags; use BIT() to get flag */ +#define IMA_NS_LSM_UPDATE_RULES 0 + /* policy rules */ struct list_head ima_default_rules; /* Kconfig, builtin & arch rules */ struct list_head ima_policy_rules; /* arch & custom rules */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 94a41572527a..060d45cf35a7 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -229,6 +229,14 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry critical_data_rules[] __ro_after_init = { {.action = MEASURE, .func = CRITICAL_DATA, .flags = IMA_FUNC}, }; +static void ima_lsm_update_rules(struct ima_namespace *ns); + +static inline void ima_lazy_lsm_update_rules(struct ima_namespace *ns) +{ + if (test_and_clear_bit(IMA_NS_LSM_UPDATE_RULES, &ns->ima_ns_flags)) + ima_lsm_update_rules(ns); +} + static int ima_policy __initdata; static int __init default_measure_policy_setup(char *str) @@ -479,7 +487,8 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, return NOTIFY_DONE; ns = container_of(nb, struct ima_namespace, ima_lsm_policy_notifier); - ima_lsm_update_rules(ns); + + set_bit(IMA_NS_LSM_UPDATE_RULES, &ns->ima_ns_flags); return NOTIFY_OK; } @@ -706,6 +715,8 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct ima_namespace *ns, if (template_desc && !*template_desc) *template_desc = ima_template_desc_current(); + ima_lazy_lsm_update_rules(ns); + rcu_read_lock(); ima_rules_tmp = rcu_dereference(ns->ima_rules); list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules_tmp, list) { @@ -1908,6 +1919,8 @@ void *ima_policy_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) struct ima_rule_entry *entry; struct list_head *ima_rules_tmp; + ima_lazy_lsm_update_rules(ns); + rcu_read_lock(); ima_rules_tmp = rcu_dereference(ns->ima_rules); list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, ima_rules_tmp, list) { -- 2.31.1