All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com, simon.horman@corigine.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, leonro@nvidia.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFT net-next 1/6] devlink: expose instance locking and add locked port registering
Date: Wed,  9 Mar 2022 16:16:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310001632.470337-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310001632.470337-1-kuba@kernel.org>

It should be familiar and beneficial to expose devlink instance
lock to the drivers. This way drivers can block devlink from
calling them during critical sections without breakneck locking.

Add port helpers, port splitting callbacks will be the first
target.

Use 'devl_' prefix for "explicitly locked" API. Initial RFC used
'__devlink' but that's too much typing.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 include/net/devlink.h | 11 +++++
 net/core/devlink.c    | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index 8d5349d2fb68..9de0d091aee9 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -1479,6 +1479,17 @@ void *devlink_priv(struct devlink *devlink);
 struct devlink *priv_to_devlink(void *priv);
 struct device *devlink_to_dev(const struct devlink *devlink);
 
+/* Devlink instance explicit locking */
+void devl_lock(struct devlink *devlink);
+void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink);
+void devl_assert_locked(struct devlink *devlink);
+bool devl_lock_is_held(struct devlink *devlink);
+
+int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
+		       struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
+		       unsigned int port_index);
+void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port);
+
 struct ib_device;
 
 struct net *devlink_net(const struct devlink *devlink);
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index fcd9f6d85cf1..c30da1fc023d 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -225,6 +225,37 @@ struct devlink *__must_check devlink_try_get(struct devlink *devlink)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+void devl_assert_locked(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_assert_locked);
+
+bool devl_lock_is_held(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	/* We have to check this at runtime because struct devlink
+	 * is now private. Normally lock_is_held() should be eliminated
+	 * as dead code in the caller and we can depend on the linker error.
+	 */
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
+		return WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+
+	return lockdep_is_held(&devlink->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_lock_is_held);
+
+void devl_lock(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_lock);
+
+void devl_unlock(struct devlink *devlink)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_unlock);
+
 static struct devlink *devlink_get_from_attrs(struct net *net,
 					      struct nlattr **attrs)
 {
@@ -9249,6 +9280,32 @@ static void devlink_port_type_warn_cancel(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&devlink_port->type_warn_dw);
 }
 
+int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
+		       struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
+		       unsigned int port_index)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
+
+	if (devlink_port_index_exists(devlink, port_index))
+		return -EEXIST;
+
+	WARN_ON(devlink_port->devlink);
+	devlink_port->devlink = devlink;
+	devlink_port->index = port_index;
+	spin_lock_init(&devlink_port->type_lock);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->reporter_list);
+	mutex_init(&devlink_port->reporters_lock);
+	list_add_tail(&devlink_port->list, &devlink->port_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->param_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->region_list);
+
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&devlink_port->type_warn_dw, &devlink_port_type_warn);
+	devlink_port_type_warn_schedule(devlink_port);
+	devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW);
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_register);
+
 /**
  *	devlink_port_register - Register devlink port
  *
@@ -9266,29 +9323,28 @@ int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
 			  struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
 			  unsigned int port_index)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
-	if (devlink_port_index_exists(devlink, port_index)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
-		return -EEXIST;
-	}
+	int err;
 
-	WARN_ON(devlink_port->devlink);
-	devlink_port->devlink = devlink;
-	devlink_port->index = port_index;
-	spin_lock_init(&devlink_port->type_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->reporter_list);
-	mutex_init(&devlink_port->reporters_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&devlink_port->list, &devlink->port_list);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->param_list);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&devlink_port->region_list);
+	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
+	err = devl_port_register(devlink, devlink_port, port_index);
 	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&devlink_port->type_warn_dw, &devlink_port_type_warn);
-	devlink_port_type_warn_schedule(devlink_port);
-	devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW);
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_register);
 
+void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink_port->devlink->lock);
+
+	devlink_port_type_warn_cancel(devlink_port);
+	devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL);
+	list_del(&devlink_port->list);
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->reporter_list));
+	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list));
+	mutex_destroy(&devlink_port->reporters_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_unregister);
+
 /**
  *	devlink_port_unregister - Unregister devlink port
  *
@@ -9298,14 +9354,9 @@ void devlink_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
 {
 	struct devlink *devlink = devlink_port->devlink;
 
-	devlink_port_type_warn_cancel(devlink_port);
-	devlink_port_notify(devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_DEL);
 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
-	list_del(&devlink_port->list);
+	devl_port_unregister(devlink_port);
 	mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock);
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->reporter_list));
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list));
-	mutex_destroy(&devlink_port->reporters_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_unregister);
 
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-10  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10  0:16 [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-03-10  9:14   ` [RFT net-next 1/6] devlink: expose instance locking and add locked port registering Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10 20:06     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11  9:15       ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-11 16:33         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 12:43           ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-11 16:09   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 16:26     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 16:57       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 17:39         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 17:41           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 17:49           ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 18:06             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 18:19               ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-10  0:16 ` [RFT net-next 2/6] eth: nfp: wrap locking assertions in helpers Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  0:16 ` [RFT net-next 3/6] eth: nfp: replace driver's "pf" lock with devlink instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  0:16 ` [RFT net-next 4/6] eth: mlxsw: switch to explicit locking for port registration Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  9:17   ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10 20:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  0:16 ` [RFT net-next 5/6] devlink: hold the instance lock in port_split / port_unsplit callbacks Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  0:16 ` [RFT net-next 6/6] devlink: pass devlink_port to " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10  8:57 ` [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting Ido Schimmel
2022-03-10 21:13   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-10 21:28     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 18:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 19:10       ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-14 20:11         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-15  7:39       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-15 15:58         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-15 17:54           ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-10  9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10  9:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-10 20:13   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11  6:30     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 10:48 ` Simon Horman
2022-03-11 16:34   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220310001632.470337-2-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.