From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D80AC433F5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236642AbiCRNXd (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:23:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236668AbiCRNX2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:23:28 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D831C231D; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 06:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14509B82345; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED08CC340E8; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:21:59 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: David Gow Cc: Brendan Higgins , Daniel Latypov , Kees Cook , Shuah Khan , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls Message-ID: <20220318092159.6f275782@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20220318021314.3225240-1-davidgow@google.com> References: <20220318021314.3225240-1-davidgow@google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800 David Gow wrote: > Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this > sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable > scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names, > descriptions etc. make any sense? Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-) -- Steve