On 03/28, Christian König wrote:
> Am 26.03.22 um 21:24 schrieb Melissa Wen:
> > dcn10_validate_bandwidth is only used on dcn10 files, but is declared in
> > dcn_calcs files. Rename dcn10_* to dcn_* in calcs, remove DC_FP_* wrapper
> > inside DML folder and create an specific dcn10_validate_bandwidth in
> > dcn10_resources that calls dcn_validate_bandwidth and properly wraps that
> > FPU function with DC_FP_* macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
> > ---
> >   .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c  | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >   .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c   |  5 +----
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h     |  2 +-
> >   3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> > index 4048908dd265..1587a060b55a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c
> > @@ -1141,6 +1141,20 @@ static void dcn10_destroy_resource_pool(struct resource_pool **pool)
> >   	*pool = NULL;
> >   }
> > +static bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> > +		struct dc *dc,
> > +		struct dc_state *context,
> > +		bool fast_validate)
> > +{
> > +	bool voltage_supported;
> > +
> > +	DC_FP_START();
> > +	voltage_supported = dcn_validate_bandwidth(dc, context, fast_validate);
> > +	DC_FP_END();
> > +
> > +	return voltage_supported;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static enum dc_status dcn10_validate_plane(const struct dc_plane_state *plane_state, struct dc_caps *caps)
> >   {
> >   	if (plane_state->format >= SURFACE_PIXEL_FORMAT_VIDEO_BEGIN
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> > index e447c74be713..c25023f7d604 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c
> > @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static unsigned int get_highest_allowed_voltage_level(uint32_t chip_family,
> >   	return 4;
> >   }
> > -bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> > +bool dcn_validate_bandwidth(
> >   		struct dc *dc,
> >   		struct dc_state *context,
> >   		bool fast_validate)
> > @@ -790,7 +790,6 @@ bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> >   		dcn_bw_sync_calcs_and_dml(dc);
> >   	memset(v, 0, sizeof(*v));
> > -	DC_FP_START();
> >   	v->sr_exit_time = dc->dcn_soc->sr_exit_time;
> >   	v->sr_enter_plus_exit_time = dc->dcn_soc->sr_enter_plus_exit_time;
> > @@ -1323,8 +1322,6 @@ bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> >   	bw_limit = dc->dcn_soc->percent_disp_bw_limit * v->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmax0p9;
> >   	bw_limit_pass = (v->total_data_read_bandwidth / 1000.0) < bw_limit;
> > -	DC_FP_END();
> > -
> >   	PERFORMANCE_TRACE_END();
> >   	BW_VAL_TRACE_FINISH();
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> > index 337c0161e72d..806f3041db14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/dcn_calcs.h
> > @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ struct dcn_ip_params {
> >   };
> >   extern const struct dcn_ip_params dcn10_ip_defaults;
> > -bool dcn10_validate_bandwidth(
> > +bool dcn_validate_bandwidth(
> >   		struct dc *dc,
> >   		struct dc_state *context,
> >   		bool fast_validate);
> 
> Just for the record: That's not really usual kernel coding style, but that's
> not topic of this patch set.
Yeah. I didn't change the code style to ease any version conflict management.
> 
> The series is Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>

Thanks!
> 
> And it would be really nice if we could make the DC_FP_* macros somehow fail
> in the dml folder.

And if we include a kind of dc_assert_fp_disabled() in the dc_fpu_begin()
(DC_FP_START) - more or less the reverse of dc_assert_fp_enabled(). Does
it meet the `make the DC_FP_* macros somehow fail in the dml folder` ?
It is not restricted to the dml folder, but I think it would work
similarly... Does it make sense?

Melissa

> 
> Thanks,
> Christian.
> 
>