From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-block-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3CC433F5
	for <linux-block@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:02:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1345549AbiC3NEJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-block@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:04:09 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50308 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S244903AbiC3NEJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-block@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:04:09 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBE4165BA3;
        Wed, 30 Mar 2022 06:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id 0138368AA6; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:02:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:02:19 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Kanchan Joshi <joshiiitr@gmail.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, sbates@raithlin.com,
        logang@deltatee.com, Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@gmail.com>,
        Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= <javier@javigon.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>,
        Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] nvme: enable non-inline passthru commands
Message-ID: <20220330130219.GB1938@lst.de>
References: <CGME20220308152729epcas5p17e82d59c68076eb46b5ef658619d65e3@epcas5p1.samsung.com> <20220308152105.309618-18-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20220310083652.GF26614@lst.de> <CA+1E3rLaQstG8LWUyJrbK5Qz+AnNpOnAyoK-7H5foFm67BJeFA@mail.gmail.com> <20220310141945.GA890@lst.de> <CA+1E3rL3Q2noHW-cD20SZyo9EqbzjF54F6TgZoUMMuZGkhkqnw@mail.gmail.com> <20220311062710.GA17232@lst.de> <CA+1E3rLGwHFbdbSTJBfWrw6RLErwcT2zPxGmmWbcLUj2y=16Qg@mail.gmail.com> <20220324063218.GC12660@lst.de> <20220325133921.GA13818@test-zns>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220325133921.GA13818@test-zns>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-block.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:09:21PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> Ok. If you are open to take new opcode/struct route, that is all we
> require to pair with big-sqe and have this sorted. How about this -

I would much, much, much prefer to support a bigger CQE.  Having
a pointer in there just creates a fair amount of overhead and
really does not fit into the model nvme and io_uring use.

But yes, if we did not go down that route that would be the structure
that is needed.