From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
lengxujun2007@126.com, arnd@arndb.de
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, smuchun@gmail.com,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: fix pmd_leaf()
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:49:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220403024928.4125-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses
the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64. Fix it. A real world issue [1]
caused by this was reported by Qian Cai.
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1]
Fixes: 8aa82df3c123 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 94e147e5456c..09eaae46a19b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
PMD_TYPE_TABLE)
#define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \
PMD_TYPE_SECT)
-#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd)
+#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT))
#define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd))
#define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE)
--
2.11.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, steven.price@arm.com,
lengxujun2007@126.com, arnd@arndb.de
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, smuchun@gmail.com,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: fix pmd_leaf()
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 10:49:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220403024928.4125-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
The pmd_leaf() is used to test a leaf mapped PMD, however, it misses
the PROT_NONE mapped PMD on arm64. Fix it. A real world issue [1]
caused by this was reported by Qian Cai.
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/comment/24798260/ [1]
Fixes: 8aa82df3c123 ("arm64: mm: add p?d_leaf() definitions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 94e147e5456c..09eaae46a19b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ extern pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
PMD_TYPE_TABLE)
#define pmd_sect(pmd) ((pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TYPE_MASK) == \
PMD_TYPE_SECT)
-#define pmd_leaf(pmd) pmd_sect(pmd)
+#define pmd_leaf(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT))
#define pmd_bad(pmd) (!pmd_table(pmd))
#define pmd_leaf_size(pmd) (pmd_cont(pmd) ? CONT_PMD_SIZE : PMD_SIZE)
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-03 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-03 2:49 Muchun Song [this message]
2022-04-03 2:49 ` [PATCH] arm64: mm: fix pmd_leaf() Muchun Song
2022-04-04 9:19 ` Will Deacon
2022-04-04 9:19 ` Will Deacon
2022-04-04 10:51 ` Steven Price
2022-04-04 10:51 ` Steven Price
2022-04-04 11:40 ` Muchun Song
2022-04-04 11:40 ` Muchun Song
2022-04-04 14:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-04 14:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-04-04 15:24 ` Muchun Song
2022-04-04 15:24 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220403024928.4125-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=lengxujun2007@126.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.