From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230DDC433F5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F41910EE4D; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A7310EE4D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 20:07:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1649189220; x=1680725220; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=P1R4fQx7yyhYX0t3qkUIgwsdq4dhKz7YKMI2P9LVYtc=; b=Zdhwi8LRbB9WM7/oUFFQKdUjuDK1OW4T9GHalmM+bBy/ciecXnjr3+1e dI2XIKX+ZjnWrm0mvCZP1hJvcSPlBxgpn54wt45sAyBRdrwMrsR96nhWB WsWm9oJ3AJXJEfymBWIon7pA4ajt0FPRP2dYOQ0dI3+hlrS/4wQHIomWR rkKxhbAMjRedC5dNHOfrgy99D/Ek8EUHv/tF4FlGBHSWB/7yBGcrGs+M4 4p8oA+qp0TJu6PibTnuqWaDTXtykL0PBczWYR+A7q0Pyvl8YCGE+RZj3W rrZ6xhD1JQ10SqriJihhsujOEuK4uUMkwzT7APrCWjayZ6unv0MCbNN9/ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10308"; a="248370223" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,238,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="248370223" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2022 13:06:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,238,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="789995135" Received: from wendu-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO ldmartin-desk2) ([10.212.136.77]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2022 13:06:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:06:58 -0700 From: Lucas De Marchi To: Casey Bowman Message-ID: <20220405200658.xukfm7y347k6joge@ldmartin-desk2> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment References: <20220331204343.1256150-1-casey.g.bowman@intel.com> <20220331204343.1256150-2-casey.g.bowman@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 1/1] Split i915_run_as_guest into x86 and non-x86 X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel.vetter@intel.com Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:04:54AM -0700, Casey Bowman wrote: >@Jani/Lucas, any other thoughts here? last version didn't pass CI: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102041/ when this happens, developer should analyze the results to check if it's a regression from their changes. When it's not a regression we can merge it, but in this case it didn't pass BAT, so there wasn't even a full run. Lucas De Marchi