All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
	zohar@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	davem@davemloft.net, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
	nramas@linux.microsoft.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
	pvorel@suse.cz, tiwai@suse.de, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] KEYS: Introduce sig restriction that validates root of trust
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 03:55:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204070321.X7bLj3Ce-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406015337.4000739-6-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>

Hi Eric,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on 3123109284176b1532874591f7c81f3837bbdc17]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eric-Snowberg/Add-CA-enforcement-keyring-restrictions/20220407-003209
base:   3123109284176b1532874591f7c81f3837bbdc17
config: riscv-randconfig-r042-20220406 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220407/202204070321.X7bLj3Ce-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/68d98a175d29032d888f3f5700c43cf771ef17d8
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Eric-Snowberg/Add-CA-enforcement-keyring-restrictions/20220407-003209
        git checkout 68d98a175d29032d888f3f5700c43cf771ef17d8
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash crypto/asymmetric_keys/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c:111:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'restrict_link_by_rot_and_signature' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
     111 | int restrict_link_by_rot_and_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/restrict_link_by_rot_and_signature +111 crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c

   110	
 > 111	int restrict_link_by_rot_and_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
   112					       const struct key_type *type,
   113					       const union key_payload *payload,
   114					       struct key *trust_keyring)
   115	{
   116		const struct public_key_signature *sig;
   117		struct key *key;
   118		int ret;
   119	
   120		if (!trust_keyring)
   121			return -ENOKEY;
   122	
   123		if (type != &key_type_asymmetric)
   124			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
   125	
   126		sig = payload->data[asym_auth];
   127		if (!sig)
   128			return -ENOPKG;
   129		if (!sig->auth_ids[0] && !sig->auth_ids[1] && !sig->auth_ids[2])
   130			return -ENOKEY;
   131	
   132		if (ca_keyid && !asymmetric_key_id_partial(sig->auth_ids[1], ca_keyid))
   133			return -EPERM;
   134	
   135		/* See if we have a key that signed this one. */
   136		key = find_asymmetric_key(trust_keyring,
   137					  sig->auth_ids[0], sig->auth_ids[1],
   138					  sig->auth_ids[2], false);
   139		if (IS_ERR(key))
   140			return -ENOKEY;
   141	
   142		if (!test_bit(KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN_ROT, &key->flags))
   143			ret = -ENOKEY;
   144		else if (use_builtin_keys && !test_bit(KEY_FLAG_BUILTIN, &key->flags))
   145			ret = -ENOKEY;
   146		else
   147			ret = verify_signature(key, sig);
   148		key_put(key);
   149		return ret;
   150	}
   151	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-06 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-06  1:53 [PATCH 0/7] Add CA enforcement keyring restrictions Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] KEYS: Create static version of public_key_verify_signature Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] KEYS: X.509: Parse Basic Constraints for CA Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:39   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 15:31     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] KEYS: X.509: Parse Key Usage Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:39   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] KEYS: Introduce a builtin root of trust key flag Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:40   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 15:27     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 16:55       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 17:34         ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 18:49           ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-08 21:59             ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-11 15:30               ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-14 16:36                 ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-14 18:09                   ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-14 21:59                     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-15 16:14                       ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] KEYS: Introduce sig restriction that validates root of trust Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06 19:55   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] KEYS: X.509: Flag Intermediate CA certs as built in Eric Snowberg
2022-04-07  1:04   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-06  1:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] integrity: Use root of trust signature restriction Eric Snowberg
2022-04-06 20:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] Add CA enforcement keyring restrictions Mimi Zohar
2022-04-06 22:53   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-04-08 14:41     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-11-04 13:20 ` Coiby Xu
2022-11-04 21:06   ` Eric Snowberg
2022-11-09  1:24   ` Elaine Palmer
2022-11-09 14:25     ` Eric Snowberg
2022-11-09 14:58       ` Elaine Palmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204070321.X7bLj3Ce-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.