From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257B1C433FE for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231439AbiDGV0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:26:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231292AbiDGV0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:26:35 -0400 Received: from sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.186.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FE7194FFF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1649366668; bh=5kt1Liqo/7tCS1co2DHvQ93kIKnE4GkkPhAw1DSEGfQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=YHRW4Eo4dnTCsSFjEov26Z41vMyhrW4dpDvWHHlN9c6uS57V1V4Ui/EFPVqszjlPRWQQPtePkKqyt/BkOd+b3fSb8nkyhBL9nS53IjJEKsnV9T4mEOKDqVq5Aodfyks+EKvwg2LKJxH9FPBmMII3Am8b39mCC5fgrOM3EEL1Q/XNuNZiuOsABNkZ/ak95we9Sz4mP3Ctrz9YtxNMw8JQex5cnKwTW6Q3C0SP3qh0yGU3CBmHqx/+B/kHiCXa9bYheqEm1s/d/N1hi8JbY8ad53GUMHWOd8ckIdDFdYcfQDirLnaHnkoLbK1WsOZCPo6v4xdRk02YDZ4qXzi9ZMfb/g== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1649366668; bh=Y/5ZRLO3CBe4wWVFv+UYLo24Nge9yD3TrhDAtyc88iz=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=GCFAPPY/YVut0gizRlCI2q2RVfDBrxrR32zfUohAXWHhl5c3gKVZYl7slb3oOqOFr8qzJNtdW6dssJK6S+qKu/ZrxwSmjP7ay+ax7zPfL2+6nPfm4oOHSKJYvk4G3ac2fQps2dDfBmA0bRKKp1g84uUpMONda5Wb9iROtjWFLF6yvuip0ofQeRJA4Z+P7hI5ErKfQN6NZPr3WzNZx1V5+cxnJBgpeTGsm9/EryRFi708RtPbt4PQoUO9QKA+i0NsW3HAmhFco2jnfyGSTQUA/epc6tSTNXUD7D5xqFyx4BWiComZMWxr8FOyTLOtzEOZiptyUNFWTVyNKNwPVE4QsA== X-YMail-OSG: U4QFjbIVM1lgtUDRB4xTInYJ7diKM03.Ty_3NL.vSFr7LsTl5F0B4BqFNdMPzeU qppaf6e9CHMvZ8J7qPxbWMniLgg5G4U36q.drvtxbhhTfEO59nTXxLCmX1h1NbPfjS0_wdw9DP67 d9pNCMA1RKtj2WywmhByjvjMDwNYWSC67qvnshfQyHuX60gnJC6sMLjxt53YgJyCyry4CRIVnJ6b Ce0WMx0I5hupPvLqUeClZVzL5b3pht8jUtm2BDg.pbHRrkTXy01kF5o_ogsYwqjBe86bjRSB822Q oDy0bMvxe768OgftXXNXORARVLqrHGU4xZLfQb56S3DCM6rZgY51fXwk.77P9cxClJ5TgmKL1d6h Nhizc2iovXWtSRuKN0X_cxy1R9Q48UXtMzdScXY4GmxtPAqdqsOGDsWTHTk5bSthsUwL9npTliw. nTJ44OSHD_jZPatBCTovqRSany9rSygzqPou4s_lepOpWvaPs6Synl4GS70Y15.teJ6Vn4hcGH8d N7ZL2A0jpJdeY5TKSwYoRY7As0j7GP_Fg1fBjgAXd44wWZwu3NexkpEmFlYSHjCYS2pkB74nKK6_ NhqviWUCQKdMxvEamJQYqPQXyhKNgTeEkIakYle5zI5b_6PJx8cwFWteGQ09R.kmR2MFLyR00wNt sCRaNynEihucAn.wl4W0cJAljPbpaYzVvP3ILXCL15q_neOW1B5hu_r0VcS3AveUtwe973FEvibr QRR.VpalPj5DcTUYaJVnsV1z5sOtLza379d_KZDSfGmVcPX9_zo21z1FY2SSJSEBcXvV7vi94oZy mwzObQwPZTLguejxXX_U70tirBlNE8EWGV8GAwBbtiFO_oGvT4GgYetcRHxG1zK.DtFnARjCx86Z Blr8YH0Kyy2cC_GQr5i96ziTe5E6J8A74tHmfNzWVr9teIEhYAZMecC7XGPMIJYso.WP4NtV0tat Kgo7yPh_XrslAVljMtXdAqxoH2RGdrIXKodsZ9D7jYwr1ggSAEdv0bNIcbNJywK0AxYidQN5bfJo ZWpp4kA1Nf6_k.jb3fFmJg.XJ2821nzaRVylTYoS6I1mgumCRfToOW3G6smIEq9fQtqxQLW3oNSv yKQYKzgb9yx0Tsq_.lVEg_wX6pa8KVI1egGi62_FKwmUMA2aXd9pbzUNJYtfLdVclSMnDZNp4ih1 YUIzHIm8.ZEWgEnKMNTi98zkKcZUbV19UgNUE0fbs9vqZ6AmWu4x8frTFTHBpHBaZ0fw6eQuvudX C4PHfsGyQPYyYs8Ybu2j1_oox3Ebt9SDBKexlyhsx.zq.WuKcb4zQvDAiaXsDT1nVki05oRSsob2 q1zQCOAr8wOw0su_HGhYn4PLggVtQmp_J43bF4ecvoMNNLTOveRgs_huX_5JfU9ACp9eop0ya_WR TkbBTdZW4R30c0sHy4ck9CfY7srLIBdjtUytTg.gDWQ1WGeeYJPoHTIlVeGhXAD5F6q9VikfOlSu _xGk0t6XESD2iY4A1vTPgOoSTJ4m_j_PpSGXRD9NRI4L10aoxX3nvxIxHrwqDV_OP5uKocKrbegK K8kfmWKAXAJHk5cW73aW6F3TAaweZtRP_h9TCwZVTPbDaAJxZZjK244hBS_Tx8faEyC4iiQH5whT 7qHVCp6CXvhSydKNzdOC6TW2DFUK.D_nQOsxW4x7OEgvKaGBG.pCrD6_cEabTZK.0RcBv5An2tO_ C_nFAOMk9wN9YHX4yMnP12vDV7.lOg2.hX5iz4kCKNZ9BG_BvOGW3cs8YWoWn7644GI5U0HiNGp4 73N45Lslhqly5fxMV30ZzxCCJeJtSI0eXTfD_WiRapyUusayxyh4xEVa1OyL8veKmpAbtRcfZcWO hxjxIUa54X5Z9Ds36wklHfj.C.7yZEwyODLDO8QyOvmo91HBfnp3cdZNMY_aW0q4jPXJhi5l1Bwh uF5YVAkxeZD49Nol18yiL14eyVm6CorxNR7qO3WjtrCpHcndLfzCGaeIsdEU7kRVhZx8P_IQ045k UmPdsB_qjuACJmZbFSDAtJi170DLtYMluJFzphwpMj89.qEPPv1p.sGbKr_NDRm0_44g7al87A6I nj5gcEScmiSTpU_KTvTRTr3hAEiTicS38QhL4yd0xZMcW6ZFLLqGVgsiCXce1wLMwb5mBKsL5CNh WSi_nArMoBzkP8Lg7zvis6sSsvEP4T9OQoFrGVPhrOPhq1jACc3QSjumazbVA812LJbwEaWo0yj2 PjCRJytRozgHupK1CxCy2Um799tVLgSN9FSDo4w0J1a90tiiknu4JJPIJlU.bjQ8_lQcTs.7cfRd S5Q-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:28 +0000 Received: by hermes--canary-production-bf1-665cdb9985-6hz22 (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7b3eda77d72d772e8386b3c1f765a2b9; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 21:24:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v34 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:22:06 -0700 Message-Id: <20220407212230.12893-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220407212230.12893-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20220407212230.12893-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Integrity measurement may filter on security module information and needs to be clear in the case of multiple active security modules which applies. Provide a boot option ima_rules_lsm= to allow the user to specify an active security module to apply filters to. If not specified, use the first registered module that supports the audit_rule_match() LSM hook. Allow the user to specify in the IMA policy an lsm= option to specify the security module to use for a particular rule. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler To: Mimi Zohar To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 8 ++++- include/linux/security.h | 14 ++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- security/security.c | 35 +++++++++++++++---- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index 839fab811b18..64863e9d87ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Description: [uid=] [euid=] [gid=] [egid=] [fowner=] [fgroup=]] lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=] - [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] + [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] [lsm=] option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio] [appraise_flag=] [appraise_algos=] [keyrings=] base: @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ Description: measure subj_user=_ func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ + It is possible to explicitly specify which security + module a rule applies to using lsm=. If the security + module specified is not active on the system the rule + will be rejected. If lsm= is not specified the first + security module registered on the system will be assumed. + Example of measure rules using alternate PCRs:: measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK pcr=4 diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 5400f68134e5..fbc9318ca288 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -1986,25 +1986,27 @@ static inline void security_audit_rule_free(struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules) #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY -int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule); -int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule); -void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule); +int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule, + int lsmslot); +int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule, + int lsmslot); +void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot); #else static inline int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, - void **lsmrule) + void **lsmrule, int lsmslot) { return 0; } static inline int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, - void *lsmrule) + void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { return 0; } -static inline void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule) +static inline void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { } #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index eea6e92500b8..97470354c8ae 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry { bool (*fgroup_op)(kgid_t cred_gid, kgid_t rule_gid); /* gid_eq(), gid_gt(), gid_lt() */ int pcr; unsigned int allowed_algos; /* bitfield of allowed hash algorithms */ + int which; /* which LSM rule applies to */ struct { void *rule; /* LSM file metadata specific */ char *args_p; /* audit value */ @@ -285,6 +286,20 @@ static int __init default_appraise_policy_setup(char *str) } __setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup); +static int ima_rules_lsm __ro_after_init; + +static int __init ima_rules_lsm_init(char *str) +{ + ima_rules_lsm = lsm_name_to_slot(str); + if (ima_rules_lsm < 0) { + ima_rules_lsm = 0; + pr_err("rule lsm \"%s\" not registered", str); + } + + return 1; +} +__setup("ima_rules_lsm=", ima_rules_lsm_init); + static struct ima_rule_opt_list *ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(const substring_t *src) { struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list; @@ -356,7 +371,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) int i; for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) { - ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule); + ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule, entry->which); kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p); } } @@ -407,7 +422,8 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, nentry->lsm[i].args_p, - &nentry->lsm[i].rule); + &nentry->lsm[i].rule, + entry->which); if (!nentry->lsm[i].rule) pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", nentry->lsm[i].args_p); @@ -623,14 +639,16 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid); rc = ima_filter_rule_match(osid, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, - rule->lsm[i].rule); + rule->lsm[i].rule, + rule->which); break; case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, - rule->lsm[i].rule); + rule->lsm[i].rule, + rule->which); break; default: break; @@ -1025,7 +1043,7 @@ enum policy_opt { Opt_fowner_lt, Opt_fgroup_lt, Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, Opt_appraise_algos, Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings, - Opt_label, Opt_err + Opt_lsm, Opt_label, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -1073,6 +1091,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, {Opt_keyrings, "keyrings=%s"}, {Opt_label, "label=%s"}, + {Opt_lsm, "lsm=%s"}, {Opt_err, NULL} }; @@ -1091,7 +1110,8 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry, entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type = audit_type; result = ima_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type, Audit_equal, entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p, - &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule); + &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule, + entry->which); if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) { pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p); @@ -1780,6 +1800,19 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) &(template_desc->num_fields)); entry->template = template_desc; break; + case Opt_lsm: + result = lsm_name_to_slot(args[0].from); + if (result == LSMBLOB_INVALID) { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) + entry->lsm[i].args_p = NULL; + result = -EINVAL; + break; + } + entry->which = result; + result = 0; + break; case Opt_err: ima_log_string(ab, "UNKNOWN", p); result = -EINVAL; @@ -1816,6 +1849,7 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule) struct ima_rule_entry *entry; ssize_t result, len; int audit_info = 0; + int i; p = strsep(&rule, "\n"); len = strlen(p) + 1; @@ -1833,6 +1867,9 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list); + for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) + entry->which = ima_rules_lsm; + result = ima_parse_rule(p, entry); if (result) { ima_free_rule(entry); @@ -2158,6 +2195,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_puts(m, "appraise_flag=check_blacklist "); if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) seq_puts(m, "permit_directio "); + if (entry->which >= 0) + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_lsm), lsm_slot_to_name(entry->which)); rcu_read_unlock(); seq_puts(m, "\n"); return 0; diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index d1ddbb857af1..9e0139b0d346 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -2728,19 +2728,42 @@ int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, * The integrity subsystem uses the same hooks as * the audit subsystem. */ -int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule) +int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule, + int lsmslot) { - return call_int_hook(audit_rule_init, 0, field, op, rulestr, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_init, list) + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) + return hp->hook.audit_rule_init(field, op, rulestr, + lsmrule); + + return 0; } -void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule) +void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { - call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_free, list) { + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) { + hp->hook.audit_rule_free(lsmrule); + return; + } + } } -int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule) +int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule, + int lsmslot) { - return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) + return hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op, + lsmrule); + + return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES */ -- 2.35.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B666EC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-583-5srvrRa1NZqWmqh5cUJz9A-1; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 17:24:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5srvrRa1NZqWmqh5cUJz9A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34399811E76; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com [10.30.29.100]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A7D40CFD02; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A34C1940340; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) by mm-prod-listman-01.mail-001.prod.us-east-1.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC21949761 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 5075A111F3DB; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast05.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8ED1121330 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB9F801E95 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic310-30.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.186.211]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-360-qLLI5crQNEGcWrr4gsMCQw-1; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 17:24:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qLLI5crQNEGcWrr4gsMCQw-1 X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1649366668; bh=Y/5ZRLO3CBe4wWVFv+UYLo24Nge9yD3TrhDAtyc88iz=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=GCFAPPY/YVut0gizRlCI2q2RVfDBrxrR32zfUohAXWHhl5c3gKVZYl7slb3oOqOFr8qzJNtdW6dssJK6S+qKu/ZrxwSmjP7ay+ax7zPfL2+6nPfm4oOHSKJYvk4G3ac2fQps2dDfBmA0bRKKp1g84uUpMONda5Wb9iROtjWFLF6yvuip0ofQeRJA4Z+P7hI5ErKfQN6NZPr3WzNZx1V5+cxnJBgpeTGsm9/EryRFi708RtPbt4PQoUO9QKA+i0NsW3HAmhFco2jnfyGSTQUA/epc6tSTNXUD7D5xqFyx4BWiComZMWxr8FOyTLOtzEOZiptyUNFWTVyNKNwPVE4QsA== X-YMail-OSG: U4QFjbIVM1lgtUDRB4xTInYJ7diKM03.Ty_3NL.vSFr7LsTl5F0B4BqFNdMPzeU qppaf6e9CHMvZ8J7qPxbWMniLgg5G4U36q.drvtxbhhTfEO59nTXxLCmX1h1NbPfjS0_wdw9DP67 d9pNCMA1RKtj2WywmhByjvjMDwNYWSC67qvnshfQyHuX60gnJC6sMLjxt53YgJyCyry4CRIVnJ6b Ce0WMx0I5hupPvLqUeClZVzL5b3pht8jUtm2BDg.pbHRrkTXy01kF5o_ogsYwqjBe86bjRSB822Q oDy0bMvxe768OgftXXNXORARVLqrHGU4xZLfQb56S3DCM6rZgY51fXwk.77P9cxClJ5TgmKL1d6h Nhizc2iovXWtSRuKN0X_cxy1R9Q48UXtMzdScXY4GmxtPAqdqsOGDsWTHTk5bSthsUwL9npTliw. nTJ44OSHD_jZPatBCTovqRSany9rSygzqPou4s_lepOpWvaPs6Synl4GS70Y15.teJ6Vn4hcGH8d N7ZL2A0jpJdeY5TKSwYoRY7As0j7GP_Fg1fBjgAXd44wWZwu3NexkpEmFlYSHjCYS2pkB74nKK6_ NhqviWUCQKdMxvEamJQYqPQXyhKNgTeEkIakYle5zI5b_6PJx8cwFWteGQ09R.kmR2MFLyR00wNt sCRaNynEihucAn.wl4W0cJAljPbpaYzVvP3ILXCL15q_neOW1B5hu_r0VcS3AveUtwe973FEvibr QRR.VpalPj5DcTUYaJVnsV1z5sOtLza379d_KZDSfGmVcPX9_zo21z1FY2SSJSEBcXvV7vi94oZy mwzObQwPZTLguejxXX_U70tirBlNE8EWGV8GAwBbtiFO_oGvT4GgYetcRHxG1zK.DtFnARjCx86Z Blr8YH0Kyy2cC_GQr5i96ziTe5E6J8A74tHmfNzWVr9teIEhYAZMecC7XGPMIJYso.WP4NtV0tat Kgo7yPh_XrslAVljMtXdAqxoH2RGdrIXKodsZ9D7jYwr1ggSAEdv0bNIcbNJywK0AxYidQN5bfJo ZWpp4kA1Nf6_k.jb3fFmJg.XJ2821nzaRVylTYoS6I1mgumCRfToOW3G6smIEq9fQtqxQLW3oNSv yKQYKzgb9yx0Tsq_.lVEg_wX6pa8KVI1egGi62_FKwmUMA2aXd9pbzUNJYtfLdVclSMnDZNp4ih1 YUIzHIm8.ZEWgEnKMNTi98zkKcZUbV19UgNUE0fbs9vqZ6AmWu4x8frTFTHBpHBaZ0fw6eQuvudX C4PHfsGyQPYyYs8Ybu2j1_oox3Ebt9SDBKexlyhsx.zq.WuKcb4zQvDAiaXsDT1nVki05oRSsob2 q1zQCOAr8wOw0su_HGhYn4PLggVtQmp_J43bF4ecvoMNNLTOveRgs_huX_5JfU9ACp9eop0ya_WR TkbBTdZW4R30c0sHy4ck9CfY7srLIBdjtUytTg.gDWQ1WGeeYJPoHTIlVeGhXAD5F6q9VikfOlSu _xGk0t6XESD2iY4A1vTPgOoSTJ4m_j_PpSGXRD9NRI4L10aoxX3nvxIxHrwqDV_OP5uKocKrbegK K8kfmWKAXAJHk5cW73aW6F3TAaweZtRP_h9TCwZVTPbDaAJxZZjK244hBS_Tx8faEyC4iiQH5whT 7qHVCp6CXvhSydKNzdOC6TW2DFUK.D_nQOsxW4x7OEgvKaGBG.pCrD6_cEabTZK.0RcBv5An2tO_ C_nFAOMk9wN9YHX4yMnP12vDV7.lOg2.hX5iz4kCKNZ9BG_BvOGW3cs8YWoWn7644GI5U0HiNGp4 73N45Lslhqly5fxMV30ZzxCCJeJtSI0eXTfD_WiRapyUusayxyh4xEVa1OyL8veKmpAbtRcfZcWO hxjxIUa54X5Z9Ds36wklHfj.C.7yZEwyODLDO8QyOvmo91HBfnp3cdZNMY_aW0q4jPXJhi5l1Bwh uF5YVAkxeZD49Nol18yiL14eyVm6CorxNR7qO3WjtrCpHcndLfzCGaeIsdEU7kRVhZx8P_IQ045k UmPdsB_qjuACJmZbFSDAtJi170DLtYMluJFzphwpMj89.qEPPv1p.sGbKr_NDRm0_44g7al87A6I nj5gcEScmiSTpU_KTvTRTr3hAEiTicS38QhL4yd0xZMcW6ZFLLqGVgsiCXce1wLMwb5mBKsL5CNh WSi_nArMoBzkP8Lg7zvis6sSsvEP4T9OQoFrGVPhrOPhq1jACc3QSjumazbVA812LJbwEaWo0yj2 PjCRJytRozgHupK1CxCy2Um799tVLgSN9FSDo4w0J1a90tiiknu4JJPIJlU.bjQ8_lQcTs.7cfRd S5Q-- X-Sonic-MF: Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 21:24:28 +0000 Received: by hermes--canary-production-bf1-665cdb9985-6hz22 (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7b3eda77d72d772e8386b3c1f765a2b9; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 21:24:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v34 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:22:06 -0700 Message-Id: <20220407212230.12893-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> In-Reply-To: <20220407212230.12893-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20220407212230.12893-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Sender: "Linux-audit" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Integrity measurement may filter on security module information and needs to be clear in the case of multiple active security modules which applies. Provide a boot option ima_rules_lsm= to allow the user to specify an active security module to apply filters to. If not specified, use the first registered module that supports the audit_rule_match() LSM hook. Allow the user to specify in the IMA policy an lsm= option to specify the security module to use for a particular rule. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler To: Mimi Zohar To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 8 ++++- include/linux/security.h | 14 ++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- security/security.c | 35 +++++++++++++++---- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index 839fab811b18..64863e9d87ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Description: [uid=] [euid=] [gid=] [egid=] [fowner=] [fgroup=]] lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=] - [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] + [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] [lsm=] option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio] [appraise_flag=] [appraise_algos=] [keyrings=] base: @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ Description: measure subj_user=_ func=FILE_CHECK mask=MAY_READ + It is possible to explicitly specify which security + module a rule applies to using lsm=. If the security + module specified is not active on the system the rule + will be rejected. If lsm= is not specified the first + security module registered on the system will be assumed. + Example of measure rules using alternate PCRs:: measure func=KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK pcr=4 diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 5400f68134e5..fbc9318ca288 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -1986,25 +1986,27 @@ static inline void security_audit_rule_free(struct audit_lsm_rules *lsmrules) #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY -int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule); -int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule); -void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule); +int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule, + int lsmslot); +int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule, + int lsmslot); +void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot); #else static inline int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, - void **lsmrule) + void **lsmrule, int lsmslot) { return 0; } static inline int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, - void *lsmrule) + void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { return 0; } -static inline void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule) +static inline void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { } #endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index eea6e92500b8..97470354c8ae 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct ima_rule_entry { bool (*fgroup_op)(kgid_t cred_gid, kgid_t rule_gid); /* gid_eq(), gid_gt(), gid_lt() */ int pcr; unsigned int allowed_algos; /* bitfield of allowed hash algorithms */ + int which; /* which LSM rule applies to */ struct { void *rule; /* LSM file metadata specific */ char *args_p; /* audit value */ @@ -285,6 +286,20 @@ static int __init default_appraise_policy_setup(char *str) } __setup("ima_appraise_tcb", default_appraise_policy_setup); +static int ima_rules_lsm __ro_after_init; + +static int __init ima_rules_lsm_init(char *str) +{ + ima_rules_lsm = lsm_name_to_slot(str); + if (ima_rules_lsm < 0) { + ima_rules_lsm = 0; + pr_err("rule lsm \"%s\" not registered", str); + } + + return 1; +} +__setup("ima_rules_lsm=", ima_rules_lsm_init); + static struct ima_rule_opt_list *ima_alloc_rule_opt_list(const substring_t *src) { struct ima_rule_opt_list *opt_list; @@ -356,7 +371,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) int i; for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) { - ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule); + ima_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule, entry->which); kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p); } } @@ -407,7 +422,8 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry *ima_lsm_copy_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) ima_filter_rule_init(nentry->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, nentry->lsm[i].args_p, - &nentry->lsm[i].rule); + &nentry->lsm[i].rule, + entry->which); if (!nentry->lsm[i].rule) pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", nentry->lsm[i].args_p); @@ -623,14 +639,16 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid); rc = ima_filter_rule_match(osid, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, - rule->lsm[i].rule); + rule->lsm[i].rule, + rule->which); break; case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, - rule->lsm[i].rule); + rule->lsm[i].rule, + rule->which); break; default: break; @@ -1025,7 +1043,7 @@ enum policy_opt { Opt_fowner_lt, Opt_fgroup_lt, Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, Opt_appraise_algos, Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_keyrings, - Opt_label, Opt_err + Opt_lsm, Opt_label, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -1073,6 +1091,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, {Opt_keyrings, "keyrings=%s"}, {Opt_label, "label=%s"}, + {Opt_lsm, "lsm=%s"}, {Opt_err, NULL} }; @@ -1091,7 +1110,8 @@ static int ima_lsm_rule_init(struct ima_rule_entry *entry, entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type = audit_type; result = ima_filter_rule_init(entry->lsm[lsm_rule].type, Audit_equal, entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p, - &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule); + &entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule, + entry->which); if (!entry->lsm[lsm_rule].rule) { pr_warn("rule for LSM \'%s\' is undefined\n", entry->lsm[lsm_rule].args_p); @@ -1780,6 +1800,19 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) &(template_desc->num_fields)); entry->template = template_desc; break; + case Opt_lsm: + result = lsm_name_to_slot(args[0].from); + if (result == LSMBLOB_INVALID) { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) + entry->lsm[i].args_p = NULL; + result = -EINVAL; + break; + } + entry->which = result; + result = 0; + break; case Opt_err: ima_log_string(ab, "UNKNOWN", p); result = -EINVAL; @@ -1816,6 +1849,7 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule) struct ima_rule_entry *entry; ssize_t result, len; int audit_info = 0; + int i; p = strsep(&rule, "\n"); len = strlen(p) + 1; @@ -1833,6 +1867,9 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->list); + for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) + entry->which = ima_rules_lsm; + result = ima_parse_rule(p, entry); if (result) { ima_free_rule(entry); @@ -2158,6 +2195,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) seq_puts(m, "appraise_flag=check_blacklist "); if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) seq_puts(m, "permit_directio "); + if (entry->which >= 0) + seq_printf(m, pt(Opt_lsm), lsm_slot_to_name(entry->which)); rcu_read_unlock(); seq_puts(m, "\n"); return 0; diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index d1ddbb857af1..9e0139b0d346 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -2728,19 +2728,42 @@ int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, * The integrity subsystem uses the same hooks as * the audit subsystem. */ -int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule) +int ima_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule, + int lsmslot) { - return call_int_hook(audit_rule_init, 0, field, op, rulestr, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_init, list) + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) + return hp->hook.audit_rule_init(field, op, rulestr, + lsmrule); + + return 0; } -void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule) +void ima_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule, int lsmslot) { - call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_free, list) { + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) { + hp->hook.audit_rule_free(lsmrule); + return; + } + } } -int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule) +int ima_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule, + int lsmslot) { - return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule); + struct security_hook_list *hp; + + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) + if (hp->lsmid->slot == lsmslot) + return hp->hook.audit_rule_match(secid, field, op, + lsmrule); + + return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES */ -- 2.35.1 -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit