All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [PATCH 05/22] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux
Date: Fri,  8 Apr 2022 11:10:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408091037.2041955-6-maxime@cerno.tech> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408091037.2041955-1-maxime@cerno.tech>

We have a few tests for a mux with a single parent, testing the case
where it used to be orphan.

Let's leverage most of the code but register the clock properly to test
a few trivial things.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 177 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 38a2d6abd28a..59661144d7a0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -352,6 +352,181 @@ struct clk_single_parent_ctx {
 	struct clk_hw hw;
 };
 
+static int clk_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx;
+	int ret;
+
+	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	test->priv = ctx;
+
+	ctx->parent_ctx.rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_INIT_RATE;
+	ctx->parent_ctx.hw.init =
+		CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-clk",
+				      &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
+				      0);
+
+	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("test-clk", "parent-clk",
+				   &clk_dummy_single_parent_ops,
+				   CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+
+	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+
+	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
+	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock with a single parent, clk_get_parent() actually
+ * returns the parent.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent;
+
+	parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, clk_is_match(parent, ctx->parent_ctx.hw.clk));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
+ * parent, if we set disjoints range on the parent and then the child,
+ * the second will return an error.
+ *
+ * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when
+ * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the upstream clocks
+ * ranges.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 1000, 2000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 3000, 4000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
+ * parent, if we set disjoints range on the child and then the parent,
+ * the second will return an error.
+ *
+ * FIXME: clk_set_rate_range() only considers the current clock when
+ * evaluating whether ranges are disjoints and not the downstream clocks
+ * ranges.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent;
+	int ret;
+
+	kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+	parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, 1000, 2000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, 3000, 4000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that for a clock that can't modify its rate and with a single
+ * parent, if we set a range on the parent and a more restrictive one on
+ * the child, and then call clk_round_rate(), the boundaries of the
+ * two clocks are taken into account.
+ */
+static void
+clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = &ctx->hw;
+	struct clk *clk = hw->clk;
+	struct clk *parent;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	parent = clk_get_parent(clk);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, parent, NULL);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(parent, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = clk_set_rate_range(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 - 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
+
+	rate = clk_round_rate(clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, rate, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1 + 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, rate, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2 - 1000);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_get_parent),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_child_last),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_disjoint_parent_last),
+	KUNIT_CASE(clk_test_single_parent_mux_set_range_round_rate_child_smaller),
+	{}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Test suite for a basic mux clock with one parent, with
+ * CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT on the child.
+ *
+ * These tests are supposed to exercise the consumer API and check that
+ * the state of the child and parent are sane and consistent.
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite
+clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite = {
+	.name = "clk-single-parent-mux-test",
+	.init = clk_single_parent_mux_test_init,
+	.exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit,
+	.test_cases = clk_single_parent_mux_test_cases,
+};
+
 static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx;
@@ -388,14 +563,6 @@ static int clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
-{
-	struct clk_single_parent_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
-
-	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->hw);
-	clk_hw_unregister(&ctx->parent_ctx.hw);
-}
-
 /*
  * Test that a mux-only clock, with an initial rate within a range,
  * will still have the same rate after the range has been enforced.
@@ -440,7 +607,7 @@ static struct kunit_case clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases[] =
 static struct kunit_suite clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_test_suite = {
 	.name = "clk-orphan-transparent-single-parent-test",
 	.init = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_init,
-	.exit = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_exit,
+	.exit = clk_single_parent_mux_test_exit,
 	.test_cases = clk_orphan_transparent_single_parent_mux_test_cases,
 };
 
@@ -1128,6 +1295,7 @@ kunit_test_suites(
 	&clk_range_test_suite,
 	&clk_range_maximize_test_suite,
 	&clk_range_minimize_test_suite,
+	&clk_single_parent_mux_test_suite,
 	&clk_uncached_test_suite
 );
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-08  9:10 [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] clk: tests: Add test suites description Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23  4:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] clk: tests: Add reference to the orphan mux bug report Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] clk: tests: Add tests for uncached clock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 06/22] clk: tests: Add tests for mux with multiple parents Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 07/22] clk: tests: Add some tests for orphan " Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 08/22] clk: Take into account uncached clocks in clk_set_rate_range() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 09/22] clk: Fix clk_get_parent() documentation Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 10/22] clk: Set req_rate on reparenting Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 11/22] clk: Skip set_rate_range if our clock is orphan Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 12/22] clk: Add our request boundaries in clk_core_init_rate_req Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 13/22] clk: Change clk_core_init_rate_req prototype Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 14/22] clk: Introduce clk_hw_init_rate_request() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23  3:46   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23  7:17     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 15/22] clk: Add missing clk_core_init_rate_req calls Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23  3:51   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23  7:32     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 16/22] clk: Remove redundant clk_core_init_rate_req() call Maxime Ripard
2022-04-23  4:02   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23  7:44     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 17/22] clk: Switch from __clk_determine_rate to clk_core_round_rate_nolock Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] clk: Introduce clk_core_has_parent() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 19/22] clk: Stop forwarding clk_rate_requests to the parent Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 20/22] clk: Zero the clk_rate_request structure Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 21/22] clk: Test the clock pointer in clk_hw_get_name() Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:10 ` [PATCH 22/22] clk: Prevent a clock without a rate to register Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08  9:18   ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 10:41     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 11:24       ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 12:55         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 14:48           ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-08 15:36             ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11  7:40               ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-12 12:56                 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11  8:20               ` Jerome Brunet
2022-04-23  4:42       ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23  9:17         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-29  2:08           ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-29 15:45             ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 12:17     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-08 12:25       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 13:46         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-04-23  4:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-23  7:49     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-10 12:06 ` [PATCH 00/22] clk: More clock rate fixes and tests Yassine Oudjana
2022-04-11 11:39   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-11  6:25 ` (EXT) " Alexander Stein
2022-04-11  7:24   ` Alexander Stein
2022-04-11 11:54     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-04-08 22:22 [PATCH 05/22] clk: tests: Add tests for single parent mux kernel test robot
2022-04-08 23:44 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220408091037.2041955-6-maxime@cerno.tech \
    --to=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=y.oudjana@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.