All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 04/10] kernfs: Introduce interface to access global kernfs_open_file_mutex.
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:37:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220410023719.1752460-5-imran.f.khan@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220410023719.1752460-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com>

This allows to change underlying mutex locking, without needing to change
the users of the lock. For example next patch modifies this interface to
use hashed mutexes in place of a single global kernfs_open_file_mutex.

Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
---
 fs/kernfs/file.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
index c89220dcfdc1..214b48d59148 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
@@ -47,6 +47,22 @@ struct kernfs_open_node {
 #define attribute_to_node(ptr, type, member)	\
 	container_of(ptr, type, member)
 
+static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(struct kernfs_node *kn)
+{
+	return &kernfs_open_file_mutex;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
+{
+	struct mutex *lock;
+
+	lock = kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(kn);
+
+	mutex_lock(lock);
+
+	return lock;
+}
+
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_notify_lock);
 static LLIST_HEAD(kernfs_notify_list);
 
@@ -520,8 +536,9 @@ static int kernfs_get_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 				struct kernfs_open_file *of)
 {
 	struct kernfs_open_node *on, *new_on = NULL;
+	struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
 
 	/**
 	 * ->attr.open changes under kernfs_open_file_mutex so we don't
@@ -531,13 +548,13 @@ static int kernfs_get_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 				   lockdep_is_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex));
 	if (on) {
 		list_add_tail(&of->list, &on->files);
-		mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(mutex);
 		return 0;
 	} else {
 		/* not there, initialize a new one and retry */
 		new_on = kmalloc(sizeof(*new_on), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!new_on) {
-			mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+			mutex_unlock(mutex);
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 		atomic_set(&new_on->event, 1);
@@ -546,7 +563,7 @@ static int kernfs_get_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 		list_add_tail(&of->list, &new_on->files);
 		rcu_assign_pointer(kn->attr.open, new_on);
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(mutex);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -567,12 +584,13 @@ static void kernfs_put_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 				 struct kernfs_open_file *of)
 {
 	struct kernfs_open_node *on;
+	struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
 
 	/* ->attr.open NULL means there are no more open files */
 	if (rcu_dereference_raw(kn->attr.open) == NULL)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
 
 	on = rcu_dereference_protected(kn->attr.open,
 				       lockdep_is_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex));
@@ -589,7 +607,7 @@ static void kernfs_put_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 		rcu_assign_pointer(kn->attr.open, NULL);
 		kfree_rcu(on, rcu_head);
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(mutex);
 }
 
 static int kernfs_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
@@ -731,7 +749,7 @@ static void kernfs_release_file(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 	 * here because drain path may be called from places which can
 	 * cause circular dependency.
 	 */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(kn));
 
 	if (!of->released) {
 		/*
@@ -748,11 +766,12 @@ static int kernfs_fop_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct kernfs_node *kn = inode->i_private;
 	struct kernfs_open_file *of = kernfs_of(filp);
+	struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
 
 	if (kn->flags & KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE) {
-		mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+		mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
 		kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
-		mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+		mutex_unlock(mutex);
 	}
 
 	kernfs_put_open_node(kn, of);
@@ -767,6 +786,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 {
 	struct kernfs_open_node *on;
 	struct kernfs_open_file *of;
+	struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
 
 	if (!(kn->flags & (KERNFS_HAS_MMAP | KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE)))
 		return;
@@ -774,7 +794,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	if (rcu_dereference_raw(kn->attr.open) == NULL)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
 	on = rcu_dereference_check(kn->attr.open,
 				   lockdep_is_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex));
 	if (!on) {
@@ -792,7 +812,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 			kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(mutex);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-10  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-10  2:37 [PATCH v8 00/10] kernfs: Remove reference counting for kernfs_open_node Imran Khan
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] " Imran Khan
2022-04-22 16:03   ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-26  1:43     ` Imran Khan
2022-04-26 18:29       ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-26 20:13         ` Al Viro
2022-04-26 20:16           ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 02/10] kernfs: make ->attr.open RCU protected Imran Khan
2022-04-22 16:19   ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-26  1:54     ` Imran Khan
2022-04-26 18:37       ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 03/10] kernfs: Change kernfs_notify_list to llist Imran Khan
2022-04-22 16:41   ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-10  2:37 ` Imran Khan [this message]
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 05/10] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_file_mutex with hashed mutexes Imran Khan
2022-04-22 17:00   ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 06/10] kernfs: Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of kernfs_super_info Imran Khan
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 07/10] kernfs: Change kernfs_rename_lock into a read-write lock Imran Khan
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 08/10] kernfs: Introduce interface to access per-fs rwsem Imran Khan
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 09/10] kernfs: Replace per-fs rwsem with hashed rwsems Imran Khan
2022-04-10  2:37 ` [PATCH v8 10/10] kernfs: Add a document to describe hashed locks used in kernfs Imran Khan
2022-04-22 17:03 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] kernfs: Remove reference counting for kernfs_open_node Tejun Heo
2022-04-23  8:49   ` Imran Khan
2022-04-25 17:21     ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-28 17:28       ` Imran Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220410023719.1752460-5-imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.