From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B15C433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 04:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244624AbiDKE5s (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:57:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229699AbiDKE5p (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:57:45 -0400 Received: from out0-153.mail.aliyun.com (out0-153.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.153]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4462112601; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 21:55:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018047188;MF=darcy.sh@antgroup.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=16;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.NOBzDY7_1649652927; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:darcy.sh@antgroup.com fp:SMTPD_---.NOBzDY7_1649652927) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:55:28 +0800 From: "SU Hang" To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: , "SU Hang" , , , "Lai Jiangshan" , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive EPT violation RWX bits from EPTE RWX bits Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 12:55:27 +0800 Message-Id: <20220411045527.13421-1-darcy.sh@antgroup.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I sincerely apologize to you and Palo for making this mistake due to my negligence and lack of testing. Since the patches only care about macro substitutions and no function changes, this makes me sloppy. Now I realize my mistake. Ashamed Hang