All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>, Gao Chao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
	Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/9] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:04:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220411090447.5928-3-guang.zeng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411090447.5928-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>

From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>

The Tertiary VM-Exec Control, different from previous control fields, is 64
bit. So extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW() by adding a 'bit' parameter, to
support both 32 bit and 64 bit fields' auxiliary functions building.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 9c6bfcd84008..122fdbf85a02 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -455,35 +455,35 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
 	return vmcs_read16(GUEST_INTR_STATUS) & 0xff;
 }
 
-#define BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(lname, uname)				    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_set(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val)	    \
-{									    \
-	if (vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname != val) {		    \
-		vmcs_write32(uname, val);				    \
-		vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname = val;		    \
-	}								    \
-}									    \
-static inline u32 __##lname##_controls_get(struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs)	    \
-{									    \
-	return vmcs->controls_shadow.lname;				    \
-}									    \
-static inline u32 lname##_controls_get(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)		    \
-{									    \
-	return __##lname##_controls_get(vmx->loaded_vmcs);		    \
-}									    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val)   \
-{									    \
-	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) | val);	    \
-}									    \
-static inline void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 val) \
-{									    \
-	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) & ~val);	    \
+#define BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(lname, uname, bits)				\
+static inline void lname##_controls_set(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
+{										\
+	if (vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname != val) {			\
+		vmcs_write##bits(uname, val);					\
+		vmx->loaded_vmcs->controls_shadow.lname = val;			\
+	}									\
+}										\
+static inline u##bits __##lname##_controls_get(struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs)	\
+{										\
+	return vmcs->controls_shadow.lname;					\
+}										\
+static inline u##bits lname##_controls_get(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)		\
+{										\
+	return __##lname##_controls_get(vmx->loaded_vmcs);			\
+}										\
+static inline void lname##_controls_setbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
+{										\
+	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) | val);		\
+}										\
+static inline void lname##_controls_clearbit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u##bits val)	\
+{										\
+	lname##_controls_set(vmx, lname##_controls_get(vmx) & ~val);		\
 }
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
-BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_entry, VM_ENTRY_CONTROLS, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(vm_exit, VM_EXIT_CONTROLS, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(pin, PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(exec, CPU_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
+BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW(secondary_exec, SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL, 32)
 
 /*
  * VMX_REGS_LAZY_LOAD_SET - The set of registers that will be updated in the
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11  9:04 [PATCH v8 0/9] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2022-04-11  9:04 ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] KVM: VMX: Report tertiary_exec_control field in dump_vmcs() Zeng Guang
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode Zeng Guang
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 14:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-19 14:07     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-26  8:14       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-26 14:00         ` Chao Gao
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] KVM: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() under kvm->lock Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 15:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-15 15:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 15:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11  9:04 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 15:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-18  9:25     ` Chao Gao
2022-04-18 15:14       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-19  0:00         ` Chao Gao
2022-04-18 12:49     ` Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 15:45   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220411090447.5928-3-guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.