All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@vayavyalabs.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
	Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>,
	Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp checking loop
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:28:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419132853.GA19386@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419005220.GA17634@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:52:20AM +0800, Tan Tee Min wrote:

> I agree that the fsleep(1) (=1us) is a big hammer.
> Thus in order to improve this, I’ve figured out a smaller delay
> time that is enough for the context descriptor to be ready which
> is ndelay(500) (=500ns).

Why isn't the context descriptor ready?

I mean, the frame already belongs to the CPU, right?

Thanks,
Richard

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@vayavyalabs.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
	Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>,
	Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp checking loop
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 06:28:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419132853.GA19386@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220419005220.GA17634@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:52:20AM +0800, Tan Tee Min wrote:

> I agree that the fsleep(1) (=1us) is a big hammer.
> Thus in order to improve this, I’ve figured out a smaller delay
> time that is enough for the context descriptor to be ready which
> is ndelay(500) (=500ns).

Why isn't the context descriptor ready?

I mean, the frame already belongs to the CPU, right?

Thanks,
Richard

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-19 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-13  4:01 [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp checking loop Tan Tee Min
2022-04-13  4:01 ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-13 12:59 ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-13 12:59   ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-14  7:29   ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-14  7:29     ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-14  8:42     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-04-14  8:42       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-04-19  0:52       ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-19  0:52         ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-19 13:28         ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2022-04-19 13:28           ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-20  5:15           ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-20  5:15             ` Tan Tee Min
2022-04-20 12:54             ` Richard Cochran
2022-04-20 12:54               ` Richard Cochran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220419132853.GA19386@hoboy.vegasvil.org \
    --to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=rayagond@vayavyalabs.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tee.min.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=tee.min.tan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vee.khee.wong@intel.com \
    --cc=weifeng.voon@intel.com \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.