Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub clock framework

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

Hello,

liang.yang@amlogic.com wrote on Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:17:48 +0800:

> Hello Miquel,
> 
> On 2022/4/19 16:26, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > liang.yang@amlogic.com wrote on Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:40:10 +0800:
> >   
> >> Hi Miquel,
> >>
> >> i have some confusion when i prepare the patches. for DT compatibility, it falls back to the old DT when failed to get resource by the new DT, but there is some points:
> >> a. old DT depends on MMC sub clock driver, but it never be merged, so it can't work.  
> > 
> > I don't get what you mean here, sorry. I believe there is a new way to
> > describe this clock but grabbing the one from the MMC still works, does
> > not it?
> >   
> 
> No, it doesn't. after the NFC driver using the MMC sub clock framework was merged into the mainline of kernel, we didn't continue to submit the series of patches about MMC sub clock after v9. when i found that, we made a discussion to decide whether to recover the series of patches about MMC sub clock framework, finally, see the description from cover letter, we plan to abandon it and adopt the new clock scheme in this series of patches.

I am not sure to follow. Is the current code completely broken? I
believe it is not, so I don't understand your issue.

Can you please summarize the situation?

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> >> b. if it falls back to the old DT, beside the regmap lookup below, it seems that we have to preserve the code of the old clock setting in nfc_clk_init().  
> > 
> > Yes, probably.
> >   
> >> do we still need to avoid break DT compatibility?  
> > 
> > We should try our best to avoid breaking the DT, yes.
> >   
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> On 2022/4/11 10:40, Liang Yang wrote:  
> >>>>>        nfc->dev = dev;
> >>>>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >>>>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> >>>>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");  
> >>>>
> >>>> This change seems unrelated.  
> >>>
> >>> To be consistent with the following > devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "emmc"). do you mean that we > don't need it?>  
> >>>>>        if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
> >>>>>            return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
> >>>>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
> >>>>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
> >>>>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
> >>>>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
> >>>>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
> >>>>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
> >>>>> -    }
> >>>>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, >>> "emmc");
> >>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
> >>>>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);  
> >>>>
> >>>> While I agree this is much better than the previous solution, we cannot
> >>>> break DT compatibility, so you need to try getting the emmc clock, but
> >>>> if it fails you should fallback to the regmap lookup.  
> >>>
> >>> ok, i will fix it next version. thanks.  
> >>>    >>>>   >>>>>        irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);  
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
> > 
> > .  


Thanks,
Miquèl