All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/5] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:45:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220421094527.32261-6-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220421094527.32261-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Adds several tests to verify correct error paths of attestation.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
 lib/s390x/asm/uv.h |   5 +-
 s390x/Makefile     |   1 +
 s390x/pv-attest.c  | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 s390x/uv-guest.c   |  13 ++-
 4 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 s390x/pv-attest.c

diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
index 7c8c399d..38920461 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
@@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ struct uv_cb_qui {
 	u8  reserved88[158 - 136];	/* 0x0088 */
 	uint16_t max_guest_cpus;	/* 0x009e */
 	u64 uv_feature_indications;	/* 0x00a0 */
-	u8  reserveda8[200 - 168];	/* 0x00a8 */
+	uint8_t  reserveda8[224 - 168];	/* 0x00a8 */
+	uint64_t supp_att_hdr_ver;	/* 0x00e0 */
+	uint64_t supp_paf;		/* 0x00e8 */
+	uint8_t  reservedf0[256 - 240];	/* 0x00f0 */
 }  __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 
 struct uv_cb_cgc {
diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 8ff84db5..5a49d1e7 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/mvpg-sie.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/epsw.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-attest.elf
 
 pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
 
diff --git a/s390x/pv-attest.c b/s390x/pv-attest.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e31780a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/pv-attest.c
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Retrieve Attestation Measurement Utravisor Call tests
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *  Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <alloc_page.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
+#include <asm/uv.h>
+#include <sclp.h>
+#include <uv.h>
+
+#define ARCB_VERSION_NONE 0
+#define ARCB_VERSION_1 0x0100
+#define ARCB_MEAS_NONE 0
+#define ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512 1
+#define MEASUREMENT_SIZE_HMAC_SHA512 64
+#define PAF_PHKH_ATT (1ULL << 61)
+#define ADDITIONAL_SIZE_PAF_PHKH_ATT 32
+/* arcb with one key slot and no nonce */
+struct uv_arcb_v1 {
+	uint64_t reserved0;		/* 0x0000 */
+	uint32_t req_ver;		/* 0x0008 */
+	uint32_t req_len;		/* 0x000c */
+	uint8_t  iv[12];		/* 0x0010 */
+	uint32_t reserved1c;		/* 0x001c */
+	uint8_t  reserved20[7];		/* 0x0020 */
+	uint8_t  nks;			/* 0x0027 */
+	int32_t reserved28;		/* 0x0028 */
+	uint32_t sea;			/* 0x002c */
+	uint64_t plaint_att_flags;	/* 0x0030 */
+	uint32_t meas_alg_id;		/* 0x0038 */
+	uint32_t reserved3c;		/* 0x003c */
+	uint8_t  cpk[160];		/* 0x0040 */
+	uint8_t  key_slot[80];		/* 0x00e0 */
+	uint8_t  meas_key[64];		/* 0x0130 */
+	uint8_t  tag[16];		/* 0x0170 */
+} __attribute__((packed));
+
+struct attest_request_v1 {
+	struct uv_arcb_v1 arcb;
+	uint8_t measurement[MEASUREMENT_SIZE_HMAC_SHA512];
+	uint8_t additional[ADDITIONAL_SIZE_PAF_PHKH_ATT];
+};
+
+static void test_attest_v1(uint64_t page)
+{
+	struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
+		.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
+		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
+	};
+	const struct uv_cb_qui *uvcb_qui = uv_get_query_data();
+	struct attest_request_v1 *attest_req = (void *)page;
+	struct uv_arcb_v1 *arcb = &attest_req->arcb;
+	int cc;
+
+	report_prefix_push("v1");
+	if (!test_bit_inv(0, &uvcb_qui->supp_att_hdr_ver)) {
+		report_skip("Attestation version 1 not supported");
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	memset((void *)page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	/*
+	 * Create a minimal arcb/uvcb such that FW has everything to start
+	 * unsealing the request. However, this unsealing will fail as the
+	 * kvm-unit-test framework provides no cryptography functions that
+	 * would be needed to seal such requests.
+	 */
+	arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_1;
+	arcb->req_len = sizeof(*arcb);
+	arcb->nks = 1;
+	arcb->sea = sizeof(arcb->meas_key);
+	arcb->plaint_att_flags = PAF_PHKH_ATT;
+	arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512;
+	uvcb.arcb_addr = (uint64_t)&attest_req->arcb;
+	uvcb.measurement_address = (uint64_t)attest_req->measurement;
+	uvcb.measurement_length = sizeof(attest_req->measurement);
+	uvcb.add_data_address = (uint64_t)attest_req->additional;
+	uvcb.add_data_length = sizeof(attest_req->additional);
+
+	uvcb.continuation_token = 0xff;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0101, "invalid continuation token");
+	uvcb.continuation_token = 0;
+
+	uvcb.user_data_length = sizeof(uvcb.user_data) + 1;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0102, "invalid user data size");
+	uvcb.user_data_length = 0;
+
+	uvcb.arcb_addr = get_ram_size() + PAGE_SIZE;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0103, "invalid address arcb");
+	uvcb.arcb_addr = page;
+
+	/* 0104 - 0105 need an unseal-able request */
+
+	arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_NONE;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0106, "unsupported version");
+	arcb->req_ver = ARCB_VERSION_1;
+
+	arcb->req_len += 1;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "arcb too big");
+	arcb->req_len -= 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * The arcb needs to grow as well if number of key slots (nks)
+	 * is increased. However, this is not the case and there is no explicit
+	 * 'too many/less nks for that arcb size' error code -> expect 0x0107
+	 */
+	arcb->nks = 2;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0107, "too many nks for arcb");
+	arcb->nks = 1;
+
+	arcb->nks = 0;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0108, "invalid num key slots");
+	arcb->nks = 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * Possible valid size (when using nonce).
+	 * However, req_len too small to host a nonce
+	 */
+	arcb->sea = 80;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "encrypted size too big");
+	arcb->sea = 17;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x0109, "encrypted size too small");
+	arcb->sea = 64;
+
+	arcb->plaint_att_flags = uvcb_qui->supp_paf ^ GENMASK_ULL(63, 0);
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010a, "invalid flag");
+	arcb->plaint_att_flags = PAF_PHKH_ATT;
+
+	arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_NONE;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010b, "invalid measurement algorithm");
+	arcb->meas_alg_id = ARCB_MEAS_HMAC_SHA512;
+
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010c, "unable unseal");
+
+	uvcb.measurement_length = 0;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010d, "invalid measurement size");
+	uvcb.measurement_length = sizeof(attest_req->measurement);
+
+	uvcb.add_data_length = 0;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == 0x010e, "invalid additional size");
+	uvcb.add_data_length = sizeof(attest_req->additional);
+
+done:
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void test_attest(uint64_t page)
+{
+	struct uv_cb_attest uvcb = {
+		.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION,
+		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
+	};
+	const struct uv_cb_qui *uvcb_qui = uv_get_query_data();
+	int cc;
+
+	/* Verify that the UV supports at least one header version */
+	report(uvcb_qui->supp_att_hdr_ver, "has hdr support");
+
+	memset((void *)page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	uvcb.header.len -= 1;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "uvcb too small");
+	uvcb.header.len += 1;
+
+	uvcb.header.len += 1;
+	cc = uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	report(cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "uvcb too large");
+	uvcb.header.len -= 1;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	bool has_uvc = test_facility(158);
+	uint64_t page;
+
+
+	report_prefix_push("attestation");
+	if (!has_uvc) {
+		report_skip("Ultravisor call facility is not available");
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	if (!uv_os_is_guest()) {
+		report_skip("Not a protected guest");
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	if (!uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION)) {
+		report_skip("Attestation not supported.");
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	page = (uint64_t)alloc_page();
+	/* The privilege check is done in uv-guest.c */
+	test_attest(page);
+	test_attest_v1(page);
+	free_page((void *)page);
+done:
+	report_prefix_pop();
+	return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
index 77057bd2..c3a90614 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 /*
  * Guest Ultravisor Call tests
  *
- * Copyright (c) 2020 IBM Corp
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2020, 2022
  *
  * Authors:
  *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
@@ -53,6 +53,15 @@ static void test_priv(void)
 	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
 	report_prefix_pop();
 
+	report_prefix_push("attest");
+	uvcb.cmd = UVC_CMD_ATTESTATION;
+	uvcb.len = sizeof(struct uv_cb_attest);
+	expect_pgm_int();
+	enter_pstate();
+	uv_call_once(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb);
+	check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PRIVILEGED_OPERATION);
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
 	report_prefix_pop();
 }
 
@@ -111,8 +120,6 @@ static void test_sharing(void)
 	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
 	report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "unshare");
 	report_prefix_pop();
-
-	report_prefix_pop();
 }
 
 static struct {
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21  9:45 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 0/5] s390x: Attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-04-21  9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 1/5] s390x: uv-host: Add invalid command attestation check Steffen Eiden
2022-04-21  9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 2/5] s390x: lib: Add QUI getter Steffen Eiden
2022-04-21 11:26   ` Janosch Frank
2022-04-21  9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 3/5] s390x: uv-guest: remove duplicated checks Steffen Eiden
2022-04-21  9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 4/5] s390x: uv-guest: add share bit test Steffen Eiden
2022-04-21 11:33   ` Janosch Frank
2022-04-21  9:45 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2022-04-26  9:22   ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 5/5] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests Janosch Frank
2022-04-26  9:39     ` Steffen Eiden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220421094527.32261-6-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.