All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:04:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220421120454.5qwzxh2gsoyjoygs@shindev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YmEYEYdO4SkNv0lc@T590>

On Apr 21, 2022 / 16:38, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:02:48AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > On Apr 20, 2022 / 23:05, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:42:14PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > > On Apr 20, 2022 / 17:34, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 01:59:11PM +0900, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > > > > The test case block/002 checks that device removal during blktrace run
> > > > > > does not leak debugfs directory. The Linux kernel commit 0a9a25ca7843
> > > > > > ("block: let blkcg_gq grab request queue's refcnt") triggered failure of
> > > > > > the test case. The commit delayed queue release and debugfs directory
> > > > > > removal then the test case checks directory existence too early. To
> > > > > > avoid this false-positive failure, delay the directory existence check.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  tests/block/002 | 1 +
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/tests/block/002 b/tests/block/002
> > > > > > index 9b183e7..8061c91 100755
> > > > > > --- a/tests/block/002
> > > > > > +++ b/tests/block/002
> > > > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ test() {
> > > > > >  		echo "debugfs directory deleted with blktrace active"
> > > > > >  	fi
> > > > > >  	{ kill $!; wait; } >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> > > > > > +	sleep 0.5
> > > > > >  	if [[ -d /sys/kernel/debug/block/${SCSI_DEBUG_DEVICES[0]} ]]; then
> > > > > >  		echo "debugfs directory leaked"
> > > > > >  	fi
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jens has merged Yu Kuai's fix[1], so I think it won't be triggered now.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/commit/?h=block-5.18&id=a87c29e1a85e64b28445bb1e80505230bf2e3b4b
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Ming, I applied the patch above on top of v5.18-rc3 and ran block/002.
> > > > Unfortunately, it failed with a new symptom with KASAN use-after-free [2]. I
> > > > ran block/002 with linux-block/block-5.18 branch tip with git hash a87c29e1a85e
> > > > and got the same KASAN uaf. Reverting the patch from the linux-block/block-5.18
> > > > branch, the KASAN uaf disappears (Still block/002 fails). Regarding block/002,
> > > > it looks the patch made the failure symptom worse.
> > > 
> > > Hi Shinichiro,
> > > 
> > > Looks Yu Kuai's patch has other problem, can you drop that patch and
> > > apply & test the attached patch?
> > 
> > Sure. With the patch, kernel message is clean. But I still observe the test case
> > failure:
> > 
> > block/002 (remove a device while running blktrace)           [failed]
> >     runtime  1.276s  ...  1.241s
> >     --- tests/block/002.out     2022-04-14 11:29:04.760295898 +0900
> >     +++ /home/shin/blktests/results/nodev/block/002.out.bad   2022-04-21 08:40:01.776511887 +0900
> >     @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> >      Running block/002
> >     +debugfs directory deleted with blktrace active
> >      Test complete
> 
> Hi Shinichiro,
> 
> Thanks for your test, and the above issue has been addressed in the
> latest post:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20220421083431.2917311-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/T/#u

Ming, I confirmed that your latest post is good, and provided Tested-by tag.
Then the change I posted for block/002 is not required. Good. Thanks again.

-- 
Best Regards,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-20  4:59 [PATCH blktests] block/002: delay debugfs directory check Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20  7:46 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-04-20  9:34 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 12:42   ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-20 15:05     ` Ming Lei
2022-04-20 22:44       ` Jens Axboe
2022-04-21  0:02       ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-04-21  8:38         ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 12:04           ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2022-04-21  8:51     ` yukuai (C)
2022-04-21  9:30       ` Ming Lei
2022-04-21 11:14         ` yukuai (C)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220421120454.5qwzxh2gsoyjoygs@shindev \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.