All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, arnd@arndb.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, heying24@huawei.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gor@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of cross CPU call.
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 13:17:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202204231333.D1x82f1d-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422200040.93813-12-dqiao@redhat.com>

Hi Donghai,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v5.18-rc3]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core next-20220422]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-a013 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220423/202204231333.D1x82f1d-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.2.0-20) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/655b898028ef1555f6bec036db8d4681b551aaa8
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Donghai-Qiao/smp-cross-CPU-call-interface/20220423-060436
        git checkout 655b898028ef1555f6bec036db8d4681b551aaa8
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_mask':
>> kernel/up.c:50:18: error: 'cpu' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fpu'?
      50 |         smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
         |                  ^~~
         |                  fpu
   kernel/up.c:50:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   kernel/up.c:44:23: warning: unused variable 'flags' [-Wunused-variable]
      44 |         unsigned long flags;
         |                       ^~~~~
   kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_mask_cond':
   kernel/up.c:80:26: error: 'cpu' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'fpu'?
      80 |                 smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
         |                          ^~~
         |                          fpu
   kernel/up.c:76:23: warning: unused variable 'flags' [-Wunused-variable]
      76 |         unsigned long flags;
         |                       ^~~~~
   In file included from include/linux/percpu.h:7,
                    from include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:5,
                    from include/linux/hardirq.h:5,
                    from include/linux/interrupt.h:11,
                    from kernel/up.c:6:
   At top level:
   include/linux/smp.h:131:14: warning: 'seq_type' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
     131 | static char *seq_type[] = {
         |              ^~~~~~~~


vim +50 kernel/up.c

    41	
    42	void smp_call_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func, void *info, unsigned int type)
    43	{
    44		unsigned long flags;
    45	
    46		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(0, mask))
    47			return;
    48	
    49		preempt_disable();
  > 50		smp_call(cpu, func, info, type);
    51		preempt_enable();
    52	}
    53	EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_mask);
    54	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-23  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] smp: consolidate the structure definitions to smp.h Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  4:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-25  8:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-25  9:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] smp: define the cross call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] smp: eliminate SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with smp_call_private() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-24 22:06     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-24 22:06       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-25  9:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] smp: use smp_call_private() fron irq_work.c and core.c Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] smp: change smp_call_function_any() to smp_call_any() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_many_cond() with __smp_call_mask_cond() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async with smp_call_private Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of cross CPU call Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  5:17   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2022-04-23  5:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-26 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202204231333.D1x82f1d-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com \
    --cc=dqiao@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heying24@huawei.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.