All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Donghai Qiao <dqiao@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, arnd@arndb.de,
	heying24@huawei.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, rdunlap@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	gor@linux.ibm.com, donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] smp: eliminate SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:10:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425091005.GE2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422200040.93813-4-dqiao@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 04:00:32PM -0400, Donghai Qiao wrote:
> The commit a32a4d8a815c ("smp: Run functions concurrently in
> smp_call_function_many_cond()") was to improve the concurrent
> of the cross call execution between local and remote. The change
> in smp_call_function_many_cond() did what was intended, but the
> new macro SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL and the code around them
> to handle local call were not unnecessary because the modified
> function smp_call_function_many() was able to handle the local
> cross call. So these two macros can be eliminated and the code
> implemented around that can be removed as well.

Maybe I've not had enough wake-up-juice, but I can't parse the above,
what?!


> @@ -787,23 +787,13 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smp_call_function_any);
>  
> -/*
> - * Flags to be used as scf_flags argument of smp_call_function_many_cond().
> - *
> - * %SCF_WAIT:		Wait until function execution is completed
> - * %SCF_RUN_LOCAL:	Run also locally if local cpu is set in cpumask
> - */
> -#define SCF_WAIT	(1U << 0)
> -#define SCF_RUN_LOCAL	(1U << 1)
> -
>  static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  					smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
> -					unsigned int scf_flags,
> +					bool wait,
>  					smp_cond_func_t cond_func)
>  {
>  	int cpu, last_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	struct call_function_data *cfd;
> -	bool wait = scf_flags & SCF_WAIT;
>  	bool run_remote = false;
>  	bool run_local = false;
>  	int nr_cpus = 0;
> @@ -829,14 +819,14 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
>  
>  	/* Check if we need local execution. */
> -	if ((scf_flags & SCF_RUN_LOCAL) && cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
> +	if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
>  		run_local = true;
>  
>  	/* Check if we need remote execution, i.e., any CPU excluding this one. */
>  	cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>  	if (cpu == this_cpu)
>  		cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> -	if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> +	if ((unsigned int)cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
>  		run_remote = true;
>  
>  	if (run_remote) {
> @@ -911,12 +901,8 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>   * @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
>   * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
>   * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> - * @wait: Bitmask that controls the operation. If %SCF_WAIT is set, wait
> - *        (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs. If
> - *        %SCF_RUN_LOCAL is set, the function will also be run locally
> - *        if the local CPU is set in the @cpumask.
> - *
> - * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
> + * @wait: If wait is true, the call will not return until func()
> + *        has completed on other CPUs.
>   *
>   * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
>   * hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler. Preemption
> @@ -925,7 +911,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  			    smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait)
>  {
> -	smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait * SCF_WAIT, NULL);
> +	smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait, NULL);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);

This changes the semantics of smp_call_function_many(), before this, if
self was in the mask it wouldn't call @func, now it will.

I appreciate you want to clean that up, but you can't do that without
auditing all callers.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-25  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] smp: consolidate the structure definitions to smp.h Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  4:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-25  8:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-25  9:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] smp: define the cross call interface Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] smp: eliminate SCF_WAIT and SCF_RUN_LOCAL Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async() with smp_call_private() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  7:30   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-24 22:06     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-24 22:06       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-25  9:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] smp: use smp_call_private() fron irq_work.c and core.c Donghai Qiao
2022-04-25  9:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] smp: change smp_call_function_any() to smp_call_any() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_many_cond() with __smp_call_mask_cond() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single_async with smp_call_private Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] smp: replace smp_call_function_single() with smp_call() Donghai Qiao
2022-04-22 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] smp: modify up.c to adopt the same format of cross CPU call Donghai Qiao
2022-04-23  5:17   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-23  5:58   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-26 14:00 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] smp: cross CPU call interface Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220425091005.GE2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=donghai.w.qiao@gmail.com \
    --cc=dqiao@redhat.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heying24@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.