All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:22:56 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220427022259.695399-6-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427022259.695399-1-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

In preparation for adding support for intent item whiteouts.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
index e5ab62f08c19..0d8d092447ad 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
@@ -47,6 +47,38 @@ xlog_cil_ticket_alloc(
 	return tic;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
+ * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
+ * the recorded commit sequence number.
+ *
+ * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
+ * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
+ * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
+ */
+static bool
+xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(
+	struct xfs_cil		*cil,
+	struct xfs_log_item	*lip)
+{
+	if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
+	 * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
+	 * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
+	 */
+	return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
+}
+
+bool
+xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
+	struct xfs_log_item *lip)
+{
+	return xlog_item_in_current_chkpt(lip->li_log->l_cilp, lip);
+}
+
 /*
  * Unavoidable forward declaration - xlog_cil_push_work() calls
  * xlog_cil_ctx_alloc() itself.
@@ -934,6 +966,40 @@ xlog_cil_build_trans_hdr(
 	tic->t_curr_res -= lvhdr->lv_bytes;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the items from
+ * the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only needed on the
+ * transaction commit side which is currently locked out by the flush lock.
+ */
+static void
+xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(
+	struct xfs_cil		*cil,
+	struct xfs_cil_ctx	*ctx,
+	uint32_t		*num_iovecs,
+	uint32_t		*num_bytes)
+{
+	struct xfs_log_vec	*lv = NULL;
+
+	while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
+		struct xfs_log_item	*item;
+
+		item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
+					struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
+		list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
+		if (!ctx->lv_chain)
+			ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
+		else
+			lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
+		lv = item->li_lv;
+		item->li_lv = NULL;
+		*num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
+
+		/* we don't write ordered log vectors */
+		if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
+			*num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Push the Committed Item List to the log.
  *
@@ -956,7 +1022,6 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
 		container_of(work, struct xfs_cil_ctx, push_work);
 	struct xfs_cil		*cil = ctx->cil;
 	struct xlog		*log = cil->xc_log;
-	struct xfs_log_vec	*lv;
 	struct xfs_cil_ctx	*new_ctx;
 	int			num_iovecs = 0;
 	int			num_bytes = 0;
@@ -1033,31 +1098,7 @@ xlog_cil_push_work(
 	list_add(&ctx->committing, &cil->xc_committing);
 	spin_unlock(&cil->xc_push_lock);
 
-	/*
-	 * Pull all the log vectors off the items in the CIL, and remove the
-	 * items from the CIL. We don't need the CIL lock here because it's only
-	 * needed on the transaction commit side which is currently locked out
-	 * by the flush lock.
-	 */
-	lv = NULL;
-	while (!list_empty(&cil->xc_cil)) {
-		struct xfs_log_item	*item;
-
-		item = list_first_entry(&cil->xc_cil,
-					struct xfs_log_item, li_cil);
-		list_del_init(&item->li_cil);
-		if (!ctx->lv_chain)
-			ctx->lv_chain = item->li_lv;
-		else
-			lv->lv_next = item->li_lv;
-		lv = item->li_lv;
-		item->li_lv = NULL;
-		num_iovecs += lv->lv_niovecs;
-
-		/* we don't write ordered log vectors */
-		if (lv->lv_buf_len != XFS_LOG_VEC_ORDERED)
-			num_bytes += lv->lv_bytes;
-	}
+	xlog_cil_build_lv_chain(cil, ctx, &num_iovecs, &num_bytes);
 
 	/*
 	 * Switch the contexts so we can drop the context lock and move out
@@ -1508,32 +1549,6 @@ xlog_cil_force_seq(
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Check if the current log item was first committed in this sequence.
- * We can't rely on just the log item being in the CIL, we have to check
- * the recorded commit sequence number.
- *
- * Note: for this to be used in a non-racy manner, it has to be called with
- * CIL flushing locked out. As a result, it should only be used during the
- * transaction commit process when deciding what to format into the item.
- */
-bool
-xfs_log_item_in_current_chkpt(
-	struct xfs_log_item	*lip)
-{
-	struct xfs_cil		*cil = lip->li_log->l_cilp;
-
-	if (list_empty(&lip->li_cil))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * li_seq is written on the first commit of a log item to record the
-	 * first checkpoint it is written to. Hence if it is different to the
-	 * current sequence, we're in a new checkpoint.
-	 */
-	return lip->li_seq == READ_ONCE(cil->xc_current_sequence);
-}
-
 /*
  * Perform initial CIL structure initialisation.
  */
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27  2:22 [PATCH 0/8 v5] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: hide log iovec alignment constraints Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  4:50     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 16:45       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  4:52     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-30 17:02   ` Alli
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: add log item flags to indicate intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: tag transactions that contain intent done items Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2022-04-27  3:15   ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  4:56     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-29  1:56   ` Alli
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: add log item method to return related intents Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: whiteouts release intents that are not in the AIL Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-28 13:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-27  2:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: intent item whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-04-27  3:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27  5:47     ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-27 17:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-27 22:05         ` Dave Chinner
2022-04-28 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-28 21:38     ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-14 22:06 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: intent whiteouts Dave Chinner
2022-03-14 22:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: factor and move some code in xfs_log_cil.c Dave Chinner
2022-04-11  5:24   ` Alli
2022-04-12 10:25     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220427022259.695399-6-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.